Answer:
b. Churches
Explanation:
Which of the following did the Civil Rights Act accomplish?
A. It ended public segregation.
B. It ended poll taxes.
C. It ended voter literacy tests.
D. It ended gender discrimination.
Answer:
A. It ended public segregation
Answer:it ended discrimination
Explanation:
it forbade discrimination on the basis of sex as well as race
Match the
ulary word with the correct definition.
plague
a disease that spreads quickly
pandemic
not continuous
famine
the widespread scarcity of food
intermittently
outbreak of a disease over a large area
affecting many people
Done
is this substance an element or compound
Answer:
Element
Explanation:
He is the symbol for Helium, which is an element.
What best describes the changes to Europe territory after World War l?
Answer:It redrew the world map and reshaped many borders in Europe. The collapse of the Russian Empire created Poland, the Baltics, and Finland. The Austro-Hungarian Empire dissolved into Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia. ... The German Empire became Germany, and Germany lost substantial territory outside Europe.
PART A: What is the meaning of "tribulation" in the paragraph below?
I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and
tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. And some of you
have come from areas where your quest - quest for freedom left you battered by
the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have
been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that
unearned suffering is redemptive.20 Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go
back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the
slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can
and will be changed.
adventure
uncertainty
desperation
O difficulty
Answer:
tribulation in this passge most likely means a cause of great struggling or trouble
Explanation:
1. Read the first speech. Does Wilson think the United States should enter WWI? Why or why
not?
Answer: No Wilson doesn’t think the United States should enter World War I.
He thinks that the US must be neutral because such divisions among
the US would be fatal to the US peace of mind.
Explanation:
From the first speech, the conclusion we can draw is that Wilson doesn't want the United States to enter World War 1.
What was World war 1 ?World War 1 was a global war from 1914 to 1918. It involved many of the world's major powers, organized into two opposing alliances: the Allies (led by the United Kingdom, France, and Russia) and the Central Powers (led by Germany and Austria-Hungary).
The immediate trigger for the war was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist in June 1914, but the underlying causes included a complex web of factors, including nationalism, militarism, and alliances.
The war was characterized by trench warfare, new technologies such as poison gas and tanks, and high casualties. It ended with the defeat of the Central Powers and the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919.
Wilson doesn't want the United States to enter World War 1 is we can conclude from the first speech.
Learn more about World war 1 here:
https://brainly.com/question/12233146
#SPJ2
7. All of the following were reasons the United States wanted to annex Texas, EXCEPT:
a. Texas helped to expand the US westward
b. The US did not want to start a war with Mexico
c. A large number Texas' citizens were from America
d. Texas had a large cotton trade with Europe
8. Which of the following was NOT a reason that Texas wanted to join the United States?
a. Many conflicts with native Americans
b. Treaties with European countries c. Large amounts of debt
d. Military conflicts with Mexico
9. Mexico agreed to sign a peace treaty to end the US-Mexican War after US troops captured:
a. Vera Cruz
b. Buena Vista
c. Monterrey
d. Mexico City
Answer:
7. c 8. c 9. b
Explanation: took the test got it right.
Internet users in the Republic of China must adhere to strict Internet use policies. These strict policies reflect which characteristics of an unlimited government?
Mark all that are true
(1) restrictions regarding freedom of voting
(2) restrictions regarding age and gender
(3) restrictions regarding freedom of the press
(4) restrictions regarding travel
(5) restrictions regarding freedom of expression
(6) restrictions regarding curfew frequency
Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.
Answer:
One short-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims is the mutual defense alliance against their common enemies which only lasted until more Englishmen including both Puritans and non-religious settlers had arrived in New England, tipping the balance of power in favor of the English.
Explanation:
Hope that this helps you out! :)
Have a good rest of your day/night!
The long and short term consequence of the alliance (respectively) between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims includes:
number of natives were killed, taken captive and sold into slavery.its assist white settlers survive by providing them with the resources for food.What is the alliance between Wampanoag & Pilgrims?This alliance involves a peace treaty that states that they will not harm each other, will come to aid if attacked by third parties and have equal jurisdiction over offenders.
However, the long term consequence was that number of natives were killed, taken captive and sold into slavery while short term consequence was that its assist white settlers survive by providing them with the resources for food.
Read more about alliance
brainly.com/question/384845
In which part of an argumentative essay should the rebuttal be included?
the conclusion
the introduction
the first body paragraph
the third body paragraph
The rebuttal should be included in the first body paragraph of an argumentative essay. Thus, option C is correct.
What is a rebuttal in an argumentative essay?A Rebuttal refers to the statement where an individual highlights the incorrect part of any argument by providing facts and information in any Essay or debate.
The main objective of rebuttal is to reject the arguments given by the opponent in the thesis by challenging them with true facts and claims. This will be written after the introduction where the discussion will take place.
Therefore, option C in the first body paragraph rebuttal will be written to make it clear for the reader.
Learn more about rebuttal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669129
#SPJ2
will give brainliest to most helpful!!!
Where does Schindler get most of his employees?
Answer: In 1939, Schindler acquired an enamelware factory in Kraków, Poland, which employed at the factory's peak in 1944 about 1,750 workers, of whom 1,000 were Jews. His Abwehr connections helped Schindler protect his Jewish workers from deportation and death in the Nazi concentration camps.
Explanation:
Can someone please help
Answer:
in backed South Korea, Russia and china backed north korea
Explanation:
the us and the un were trying to defend the capitalist south korea, while the ussr and china were trying to spread communism, same thing in vietnam
Which of these was a feature of the relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States in the era leading up to détente?
nuclear war
direct conflict
arms race
cooperation
c. arms race
during the cold war, america, the soviet union, and their respective allies all participated in a nuclear arms race.
It should be noted that the relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States in the era leading up to détente is a arms race relationship.
What is arms race relationship?The arms race can be regarded as a pattern of competitive acquisition of military capability between two or more countries.
This was the relationship experienced relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States in the era leading up to détente.
Learn more about arms race at:
https://brainly.com/question/3413076
When was the date of birth of Henry VIII
Answer:
Explanation:
His date of birth was June 28, 1491
why do some people still question the truth behind what happened when Kennedy was assassinated, who was behind it, and why the us public may not be told the whole truth
(please help asap 15 points)
What is humanism?
a. The study of human history.
b. A belief in the superiority of humans over other animals.
c. An intellectual movement that launched the rediscovery of antiquity
d. A religion in which human life is worshipped.
Answer:
I think its A
Explanation:
chreg at first, rowlandson is filled, understandably, with great anger, hatred, and fear of her indian masters. does rowlandson change her views of natives by the end of her story? if so, how?
In the narrative of Mary Rowlandson, the transformation of her views of natives is very evident.
In her captivity, Mary was initially filled with anger, fear, and hatred towards her Indian captors, but as the story progressed, her views of the natives changed positively, and she eventually recognized their humanity.
Mary Rowlandson thought very negatively of the natives at first. She perceived them as savage and inferior creatures. She hated them for taking her from her comfortable lifestyle and making her a captive.
Mary Rowlandson's views of the natives changed for the better. During her captivity, she had the chance to observe the natives more closely, and she began to understand that they were not the savages she initially believed them to be.
She started to understand that the natives had their own lives, beliefs, and culture that were different from her own. Mary Rowlandson's interactions with the natives throughout her captivity led her to develop a newfound respect and appreciation for their way of life, which is evident in the later stages of her story.
To learn more about transformation, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/11709244
#SPJ11
Because of the war, what changed the most in American Society?
A. Schools
B. Churches
C. Prisons
D. Gender Roles
Answer:
Definetely gender roles.
Explanation:
Equality was and still is a huge problem in our society.
how does the 3/5 compromise contribute to sectionalism
Answer:
The Three-Fifths Compromise is an example of sectionalism in American history. The Compromise demonstrates group (white land owners) looking down upon another group (black slaves) as through they are lesser. The Three-Fifths Compromise degrades a whole group of people categorizing them as less than human.
Explanation:
Pls help I’m stuckkk
Answer:
was it michigan
Explanation:
what was one effect of slave sales?
Answer:
Abolitionists got more intense
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Slaves knew that in most cases sale was the death of their familial relationships. If they were “sold south,” they would never see their family again. Slaveholders often used the threat of sale against their enslaved laborers
HELP ASAPPP
Ranking the Supporters of the War
You will now judge the contributions that African Americans, Native Americans, and women made to the American Revolution by ranking each group. The group you believe made the largest contribution you will rank #1, the group you believe made the smallest contribution you will rank #3. You will explain your reasoning for each ranking by including specific examples of each group's contribution and why you feel that contribution was more valuable than other groups. Please be sure that all work is in written in complete sentences using your own words. Your assignment must include the following:
A rank for each group—#1 has made the largest contribution and #3 has made the smallest contribution.
At least two sentences explaining why each group was ranked the way it is. Be sure to include specific examples from the lesson.
At least two sentences explaining why you believe the group ranked #1 made contributions more valuable than the other groups.
One image with an explanation of how it represents the group you ranked as #1.
Answer:Well Women would be number 1,
Women is ranked number 1 because they helped the military in many way even if they weren't allowed to go to fight at war. They helped as nurses to treat wounded soldiers, took care of things at home while their husband was at war, and allot helped by sending messages, making food to feed soldier and they helped in the military warehouses to spread out military equipment needed by the military.
African Americans were ranked number 2 due to they helped the British and Americans at the same time. British promised them if they helped to fight in the war they would gain their freedom. So they would go and join the British but allot fought on our side as well. Natives Americans are ranked number 3 due to They did not help Americans at all only the British Army since the British were not well familiar with America and hiding in the woods the Natives would help them because they saw that we were taking all their land so they wanted to make sure that process would stop.
One way in which immigration policy in the 1960s differed from
immigration policy enacted in the 1920s was that legislation in the 1960s
a. imposed a ban on immigration from Asia
b. loosened restrictions on immigration on the basis of national origin
c. established limits on the number of immigrants allowed in the country
d. barred immigration from Eastern European countries
One way in which immigration policy in the 1960s differed from immigration policy enacted in the 1920s was that legislation in the 1960s:
B. loosened restrictions on immigration on the basis of national originWhat is Immigration Policy?This refers to the rules and edicts which a government of a country makes as regards to people coming into the country and how long they are allowed to stay.
With this in mind, we can see that in the 1960s, the immigration policy was very much different from the ones done in the 1920s and the main difference was there was loosened restrictions on immigration on the basis of national origin
Read more about immigration policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/899065
what was seen by U2 spy planes that caused the American military to become concerned?
Answer:
United States and the Soviet Union that began with the shooting down of a U.S. U-2 reconnaissance plane over the Soviet Union and that caused the collapse of a summit conference in Paris between the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France.
Explanation:
how has kurtz managed to raid the country alone? could anything stop kurtz from ""killing whom he jolly well pleased""?
In the novel Heart of Darkness, Kurtz managed to raid the country alone with the help of his charisma and reputation as an extraordinary trader. Kurtz has been able to convince the natives that he possesses supernatural powers, and as such, he gained access to ivory from the villagers. After trading with them, he would force them to bring more ivory without offering them anything in return.
As a result, Kurtz gained a lot of wealth and power, and he became uncontrollable. His behavior worsened after contracting a serious illness, which made him a madman. He then began to raid the country alone, kill anyone he wished to, and loot whatever he desired.
Know more about Heart of Darkness here:
https://brainly.com/question/29688019
#SPJ11
Why do you think delegates to the Seneca falls convention modeled their declaration on the Declaration of Independence?
Why was Johnson more effective and more successful than kennedy? WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ANSWER (3 sentences please)
Explanation:
President Kennedy had much less congressional experience than Johnson. LBJ had been involved in politics of one kind or another for virtually his whole adult life. It's no exaggeration to say that politics was everything to him; he ate, slept, and drank politics to the exclusion of all else.
Throughout his time in the United States senate, Johnson came to know its often arcane and mysterious workings inside out, in the process gaining an unparalleled understanding in how to get legislation passed. If you've ever had the chance to read Robert A. Caro's remarkable biography of Johnson, you'll see how he almost single-handedly transformed the office of Senate Majority Leader from a largely formal position into one of the most powerful roles in American politics.
did roosevelt use any logical fallacies or fallacious reasoning? if so, where in the speech did he do so?
In his Pearl Harbor speech, President Roosevelt did not employ any evident logical fallacies or fallacious reasoning.
This is because he focused on presenting a clear and persuasive case for the United States to enter World War II by appealing to emotions, national unity, and the defense of freedom and democracy, rather than relying on faulty reasoning or deceptive tactics.
In his Pearl Harbor speech, President Roosevelt skillfully avoided employing logical fallacies or fallacious reasoning. Instead of relying on faulty arguments, he strategically utilized persuasive techniques to rally the American people. Roosevelt appealed to their emotions by vividly describing the unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor and the loss of American lives. He emphasized national unity and the shared responsibility to defend freedom and democracy, fostering a sense of collective purpose.
By framing the attack as a direct threat to American values and security, he effectively justified the United States' entry into World War II. Overall, Roosevelt's speech successfully utilized rhetorical devices and emotional appeals without resorting to logical fallacies or fallacious reasoning.
This question is related to "Rhetorical Analysis of President Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech".
Learn more about roosevelt: https://brainly.com/question/25608255
#SPJ11
how did the institution of slavery continue to affect the world even after it was abolished?
a.it reduced the level of racism and racial inequality in most countries
b.it contributed to overpopulation of the african continent
c.it created lasting economic problems and social chaos inafrica
d.it led to hostilities and war between europe and the united states
Answer:d
Explanation: it reduced African states ability to resist European imperialism
Answer:
d
Explanation:
What conclusion can you make about the way Elijah McCoy was treated after he invented the "drip cup"? Support your answer with explicit textual evidence.
Elijah McCoy, after inventing the "drip cup" faced challenges and discrimination in his professional life due to racial prejudice and attempts to undermine his invention.
Despite Elijah McCoy's invention of the "drip cup," which revolutionized the lubrication process in steam engines, he encountered significant obstacles and mistreatment. McCoy's African-American heritage likely played a role in the difficulties he faced. Textual evidence supports this conclusion. For instance, an article from the Detroit Free Press in 1884 stated, "He [McCoy] has had many imitators, but no equals... The growth of a negro inventor in the mechanical line is something unusual, if not remarkable." This quote suggests that McCoy's accomplishments were seen as remarkable due to his race, highlighting the racial prejudice prevalent during that time.
Moreover, another article from the Atlanta Daily World in 1920 described McCoy's experiences, stating, "White competitors tried to discourage his work, or steal his ideas." This statement indicates that McCoy not only encountered racial discrimination but also faced attempts by others to undermine his invention or claim credit for his ideas. These challenges and mistreatment demonstrate the racial bias and discrimination that McCoy had to overcome in his professional life, despite his significant contributions to technological advancements.
To learn more about Elijah McCoy.
Click here:brainly.com/question/26698246?
#SPJ11