a = 2.7 cm, b = 12 cm and c = 9.2 cm. If m is the midpoint of SR Calculate the size of angle MwwT (correct to 1 d.p.) ​

Answer:

  G. 8/3

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the area between y=2 and y=√x.

The square root curve is only defined for x ≥ 0. It will have a value of 2 or less for ...

  √x ≤ 2

  x ≤ 4 . . . . square both sides

So, the integral has bounds of 0 and 4.

The integral is ...

  [tex]\displaystyle \int_0^4{(2-x^\frac{1}{2})}\,dx=\left[2x-\dfrac{2}{3}x^\frac{3}{2}\right]_0^4=8-\dfrac{2}{3}(\sqrt{4})^3=\boxed{\dfrac{8}{3}}[/tex]

__

Additional comment

You will notice that this is 1/3 of the area of the rectangle that is 4 units wide and 2 units high. That means the area inside a parabola is 2/3 of the area of the enclosing rectangle. This is a useful relation to keep in the back of your mind.

Rounding to three decimal places, we estimate sigma_n =[tex]1^{infinity[/tex] 11/[tex]n^8[/tex] with > sigma_n = [tex]1^4[/tex] 11/[tex]n^8[/tex] = 0.001

To find the sum of the series sigma_n = [tex]1^{infinity[/tex] 11/[tex]n^6[/tex] correct to three decimal places, we first need to check if the function f(x) = 11/[tex]x^8[/tex] is positive, continuous, and decreasing for x > 0.
Since f'(x) = -88/[tex]x^9[/tex], we can confirm that f(x) is decreasing on (0, infinity).

Now we can apply the Integral Test to estimate the remainder, R_n.
We want R_n ≤ 0.0005 for the sum to be correct to three decimal places. If we take n = 4, we can calculate R_4.

Since R_4 ≤ 0.0005, the sum sigma_n = [tex]1^4 11/n^6[/tex] is an approximation of sigma_n = [tex]1^{infinity} 11/n^6[/tex] correct to three decimal places. When rounded to three decimal places, we estimate sigma_n = [tex]1^{infinity} 11/n^6[/tex] to be approximately equal to the sum sigma_n = [tex]1^4 11/n^6[/tex] = 0.001.

To know more about "Function" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/16386617#

#SPJ11

40,000 ft-lb of work is required to lift the cable to the top of the building.

To lift the cable to the top of the building, we need to apply a force equal to the weight of the cable. The weight of the cable is given as 200 lb.

The work done to lift the cable is equal to the force applied multiplied by the distance moved. In this case, the distance moved is the height of the building, which is not given in the problem. So, we will assume a height for the building, say 200 ft, and calculate the work done based on that assumption.

To lift the cable to a height of 200 ft, we need to overcome the force of gravity acting on the cable. The work done against gravity is given by:

Work = Force x Distance moved against the force of gravity

The force of gravity on the cable is given by the weight of the cable, which is 200 lb. The distance moved against the force of gravity is the height of the building, which is 200 ft. So, the work done against gravity is:

Work = 200 lb x 200 ft = 40,000 ft-lb

Therefore, to lift the cable to the top of a 200-ft tall building, we need to do 40,000 ft-lb of work. If the actual height of the building is different, the amount of work required will be different as well.

Learn more about work done

brainly.com/question/13662169

#SPJ11

The probability that both blue crabs are under 10 inches is approximately 37.4%.

To find the probability that both blue crabs are under 10 inches:

We need to consider the normal distribution, mean, and standard deviation of their body lengths.

The body length of blue crabs follows a normal distribution with a mean of 9 inches and a standard deviation of 3.5 inches.

Step 1: Find the z-score for 10 inches.
z = (X - mean) / standard deviation
z = (10 - 9) / 3.5
z = 1 / 3.5
z ≈ 0.286

Step 2: Look up the z-score in a standard normal distribution table or use a calculator to find the probability associated with the z-score.
P(Z ≤ 0.286) ≈ 0.612

Step 3: Since the lengths of blue crabs are independent, multiply the probability of one crab being under 10 inches by itself to find the probability of both crabs being under 10 inches.
P(both crabs under 10 inches) = P(1st crab under 10 inches) * P(2nd crab under 10 inches)
P(both crabs under 10 inches) = 0.612 * 0.612
P(both crabs under 10 inches) ≈ 0.374

Therefore, the probability that both blue crabs are under 10 inches is approximately 37.4%.

To know more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The probability that both blue crabs are under 10 inches is approximately 37.4%.

To find the probability that both blue crabs are under 10 inches:

We need to consider the normal distribution, mean, and standard deviation of their body lengths.

The body length of blue crabs follows a normal distribution with a mean of 9 inches and a standard deviation of 3.5 inches.

Step 1: Find the z-score for 10 inches.
z = (X - mean) / standard deviation
z = (10 - 9) / 3.5
z = 1 / 3.5
z ≈ 0.286

Step 2: Look up the z-score in a standard normal distribution table or use a calculator to find the probability associated with the z-score.
P(Z ≤ 0.286) ≈ 0.612

Step 3: Since the lengths of blue crabs are independent, multiply the probability of one crab being under 10 inches by itself to find the probability of both crabs being under 10 inches.
P(both crabs under 10 inches) = P(1st crab under 10 inches) * P(2nd crab under 10 inches)
P(both crabs under 10 inches) = 0.612 * 0.612
P(both crabs under 10 inches) ≈ 0.374

Therefore, the probability that both blue crabs are under 10 inches is approximately 37.4%.

To know more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The list of combinations is xy, xz, xs, xt, yz, ys, yt, zs, zt, and st.

The notation "⁵C₂" stands for the number of combinations of 5 objects taken 2 at a time.

In mathematics, combinations are ways of selecting objects from a larger set without regard to the order in which the objects are selected.

The formula used to calculate the number of combinations is

                             [tex]^{n} C_{r} = \frac{n!}{r\times (n- r)!}[/tex]    

Where n is the total number of objects, r is the number of objects being chosen

Here we have

Five objects x, y, z, s, and t taken two at a time

The notation "⁵C₂" stands for the number of combinations of 5 objects taken 2 at a time.

Using the combinations formula:

=> ⁵C₂ = 5! / (2!× (5-2)!)

= 5! / (2! × 3!)

= (5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1) / ((2 × 1)× (3 × 2 × 1))

= 10

Therefore,

There will be 10 combinations of five objects taken two at a time.

The combinations of five objects taken two at a time are:

xy, xz, xs, xt, yz, ys, yt, zs, zt, and st.

Therefore,

The list of combinations is xy, xz, xs, xt, yz, ys, yt, zs, zt, and st.

The notation "⁵C₂" stands for the number of combinations of 5 objects taken 2 at a time.

Learn more about Combinations at

https://brainly.com/question/11750860

#SPJ1

The list of combinations is xy, xz, xs, xt, yz, ys, yt, zs, zt, and st.

The notation "⁵C₂" stands for the number of combinations of 5 objects taken 2 at a time.

In mathematics, combinations are ways of selecting objects from a larger set without regard to the order in which the objects are selected.

The formula used to calculate the number of combinations is

                             [tex]^{n} C_{r} = \frac{n!}{r\times (n- r)!}[/tex]    

Where n is the total number of objects, r is the number of objects being chosen

Here we have

Five objects x, y, z, s, and t taken two at a time

The notation "⁵C₂" stands for the number of combinations of 5 objects taken 2 at a time.

Using the combinations formula:

=> ⁵C₂ = 5! / (2!× (5-2)!)

= 5! / (2! × 3!)

= (5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1) / ((2 × 1)× (3 × 2 × 1))

= 10

Therefore,

There will be 10 combinations of five objects taken two at a time.

The combinations of five objects taken two at a time are:

xy, xz, xs, xt, yz, ys, yt, zs, zt, and st.

Therefore,

The list of combinations is xy, xz, xs, xt, yz, ys, yt, zs, zt, and st.

The notation "⁵C₂" stands for the number of combinations of 5 objects taken 2 at a time.

Learn more about Combinations at

https://brainly.com/question/11750860

#SPJ1

The probability for -2.51 ≤ Z ≤ -1.53 is 0.0570.

The probability for Z ≥ -2.12 is 0.9830.

To find the probability for the given scenarios, we can use the Z-table or standard normal distribution table, which provides the cumulative probabilities for a standard normal random variable Z.

1) For -2.51 ≤ Z ≤ -1.53:

Find the cumulative probability for Z = -1.53 and Z = -2.51 using the Z-table. Then subtract the cumulative probability of Z = -2.51 from the cumulative probability of Z = -1.53.

P(-1.53) = 0.0630
P(-2.51) = 0.0060

P(-2.51 ≤ Z ≤ -1.53) = P(-1.53) - P(-2.51) = 0.0630 - 0.0060 = 0.0570

2) For Z ≥ -2.12:

Find the cumulative probability for Z = -2.12 using the Z-table. Since we want the probability that Z is greater than or equal to -2.12, we need to subtract the cumulative probability from 1.

P(-2.12) = 0.0170

P(Z ≥ -2.12) = 1 - P(-2.12) = 1 - 0.0170 = 0.9830

So, the probability for -2.51 ≤ Z ≤ -1.53 is 0.0570, and the probability for Z ≥ -2.12 is 0.9830.

To learn more about standard normal random variables visit : https://brainly.com/question/29612422

#SPJ11

Efficient convolution of a signal x(n) with a causal filter h(n) can be done using the overlap-add method, where the signal is split into blocks, each block is zero-padded, convolved with the filter, and then added together.

The given scenario describes a technique for efficiently convolving a signal with a causal filter by using the circular convolution property of the discrete Fourier transform. The technique involves breaking up the signal and filter into smaller chunks, performing the circular convolution of these chunks using the Fourier transform, and then reassembling the resulting chunks to obtain the final convolution output.

This approach reduces the computational complexity of the convolution operation and is commonly used in digital signal processing applications.

To learn more about Fourier transform, here

https://brainly.com/question/31421210

#SPJ4

Efficient convolution of a signal x(n) with a causal filter h(n) can be done using the overlap-add method, where the signal is split into blocks, each block is zero-padded, convolved with the filter, and then added together.

The given scenario describes a technique for efficiently convolving a signal with a causal filter by using the circular convolution property of the discrete Fourier transform. The technique involves breaking up the signal and filter into smaller chunks, performing the circular convolution of these chunks using the Fourier transform, and then reassembling the resulting chunks to obtain the final convolution output.

This approach reduces the computational complexity of the convolution operation and is commonly used in digital signal processing applications.

To learn more about Fourier transform, here

https://brainly.com/question/31421210

#SPJ4

The correct choice is B. F is not conservative on R^3.

To determine whether the vector field F = (4yz, 4xz, 4xy) is conservative on R^3, we need to check whether it satisfies the following condition:

∂F/∂y = ∂F/∂x, ∂F/∂z = ∂F/∂x, and ∂F/∂y = ∂F/∂z

Taking partial derivatives of F with respect to x, y, and z, we get:

∂F/∂x = (0, 4z, 4y)

∂F/∂y = (4z, 0, 4x)

∂F/∂z = (4y, 4x, 0)

Checking the first condition, we have:

∂F/∂y = (4z, 0, 4x) ≠ (0, 4z, 4y) = ∂F/∂x

Therefore, F is not conservative on R^3.

The correct choice is B. F is not conservative on R^3.

To learn more about following visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28983545

#SPJ11

The function then dereferences the pointer to access the value stored in the variable and sets it to 0 using the assignment operator (=). As a result, the variable x is zeroed out.

The definition of the function zeroit, which is used to zero out a variable, is:

void zeroit(int* var) {
 *var = 0;
}

The function is used as follows:

int x = 5;
zeroit(&x); /* x is now equal to 0 */

In this example, the address of variable x is passed as an argument to the function zero it using the address-of operator (&).

Know more about function zeroit here:

https://brainly.com/question/13826656

#SPJ11

W is the set of all vectors in R3 with nonnegative components.

W is not a subspace of the vector space R3.

To verify that W is not a subspace of the vector space R3, we will check if it satisfies the conditions from Theorem 4.5. The theorem states that a set W is a subspace if:

1. The zero vector is in W.
2. If u and v are elements of W, then u+v is in W (closed under addition).
3. If u is an element of W and c is a scalar, then cu is in W (closed under scalar multiplication).

W is the set of all vectors in R3 with nonnegative components. Let's examine each condition:

1. The zero vector (0, 0, 0) is in W because its components are nonnegative.

Now, let's check if W is closed under addition and scalar multiplication. We will do this by providing a specific example that violates either condition 2 or 3:

2. Consider the vectors u = (1, 0, 0) and v = (0, 1, 0), both of which are in W. However, if we add them, we get u+v = (1, 1, 0), which is still in W.

3. Let's use vector u = (1, 0, 0) again, and let c = -1 be our scalar. Now, if we multiply u by c, we get cu = (-1, 0, 0). This result is not in W, as the first component is negative.

Since the third condition is violated, we can conclude that W is not a subspace of the vector space R3.

To learn more about vector spaces visit : https://brainly.com/question/13258990

#SPJ11

If the constraint that needs to be added to the formulation of a BIP problem with 3 mutually exclusive alternatives, x1, x2, and x3 is that only one alternative can be selected, then the constraint can be formulated as follows:

x1 + x2 + x3 <= 1

This constraint ensures that at most one of the alternatives can be selected, as the sum of their binary variables cannot exceed 1. Therefore, the alternatives are mutually exclusive, and only one of them can be chosen.

In a Binary Integer Programming (BIP) problem with 3 mutually exclusive alternatives x1, x2, and x3, the following constraint needs to be added to the formulation to ensure that only one alternative is selected:

x1 + x2 + x3 = 1

This constraint ensures that only one of the variables x1, x2, or x3 can take the value of 1, while the others remain at 0, indicating the selection of a single alternative.

Visit here to learn more about  Integer : https://brainly.com/question/15276410
#SPJ11

The remainder when 7 . 8 . 9. 15 . 16 . 17 . 23.  24. 25. 43 is divided by 11 is 10.

To find the remainder when 7 · 8 · 9 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 43 is divided by 11, follow these steps:

1. Calculate the product:

  7 · 8 · 9 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 43

= 12,20,22,02,88,000.

2. Divide the product by 11:

3,652,761,600 ÷ 11.

3. Determine the remainder:

In this case, the remainder is 10.

So, the remainder when 7 · 8 · 9 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 43 is divided by 11 is 10.

To learn more about division:  https://brainly.com/question/27601809

#SPJ11

The third term in the given sequence is 38.

Given that, if in a sequence a₁ = 8 and aₙ = 2aₙ₋₁ + n, we need to find the value of a₃,

Therefore, to the pattern of the given sequence we will have,

a₂ = 2 × a₂₋₁ + 2

= 2 × 8 + 2

= 18

Now,

a₃ = 2 × a₃₋₁ + 2

= 2 × a₂ + 2

= 2 × 18 + 2

= 36 + 2

= 38

Hence the third term in the given sequence is 38.

Learn more about sequence click;

https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ1

(a) The count is found to be 12, so ψ(25, 3) = 12.

(b) There are 22 numbers that satisfy this condition, so ψ(35, 5) = 22.

(c) There are 32 numbers that satisfy this condition, so ψ(50, 7) = 32.

(b)There are 53 numbers that satisfy this condition, so ψ(100, 5) = 53.

(e) There are 54 numbers that satisfy this condition, so ψ(100, 7) = 54.

(a) ψ(25, 3): The notation ψ(X, B) represents the count of B-smooth numbers (numbers with only prime factors less than or equal to B) between 2 and X.

For this case, we are looking for the number of 3-smooth numbers between 2 and 25. The 3-smooth numbers are those that can be factored into prime factors of 2 and/or 3 only.

By listing the numbers between 2 and 25 and checking their prime factorization, we can count the numbers that have only 2 and/or 3 as factors. The count is found to be 12, so ψ(25, 3) = 12.

(b) ψ(35, 5): Similarly, we are looking for the number of 5-smooth numbers between 2 and 35.

These are the numbers that can be factored into prime factors of 2, 3, and/or 5 only.

By checking the prime factorization of the numbers between 2 and 35, we find that there are 22 numbers that satisfy this condition, so ψ(35, 5) = 22.

(c) ψ(50, 7): Here, we are interested in the count of 7-smooth numbers between 2 and 50.

These are the numbers that can be factored into prime factors of 2, 3, 5, and/or 7 only.

By checking the prime factorization of the numbers between 2 and 50, we find that there are 32 numbers that satisfy this condition, so ψ(50, 7) = 32.

(d) ψ(100, 5): For this case, we are looking for the count of 5-smooth numbers between 2 and 100.

These are the numbers that can be factored into prime factors of 2, 3, and/or 5 only.

By checking the prime factorization of the numbers between 2 and 100, we find that there are 53 numbers that satisfy this condition, so ψ(100, 5) = 53.

(e) ψ(100, 7): Lastly, we are interested in the count of 7-smooth numbers between 2 and 100.

These are the numbers that can be factored into prime factors of 2, 3, 5, and/or 7 only.

By checking the prime factorization of the numbers between 2 and 100, we find that there are 54 numbers that satisfy this condition, so ψ(100, 7) = 54.

Learn more about B-smooth numbers

brainly.com/question/14653844

#SPJ11

It depends on the test results. If the p-value obtained from the test is less than the level of significance (0.05), the engineer can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean force is not equal to 650.

If the p-value is greater than 0.05, the engineer cannot reject the null hypothesis and cannot conclude that the mean force is different from 650.

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis is a statement about a population parameter that is assumed to be true until proven otherwise. In this case, the null hypothesis is that the mean force is equal to 650. The alternative hypothesis is that the mean force is not equal to 650.

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as or more extreme than the observed one, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. It measures the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. If the p-value is less than the level of significance (0.05 in this case), it means that the observed result is unlikely to occur by chance alone, and the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Therefore, if the p-value obtained from the test is less than 0.05, the engineer can conclude that there is strong evidence to suggest that the mean force is not equal to 650, and they can reject the null hypothesis. On the other hand, if the p-value is greater than 0.05, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and the engineer cannot conclude that the mean force is different from 650.

It's important to note that rejecting the null hypothesis does not necessarily mean that the alternative hypothesis is true; it simply means that there is evidence against the null hypothesis. Similarly, failing to reject the null hypothesis does not necessarily mean that the null hypothesis is true; it just means that there is insufficient evidence to reject it.

To learn more about hypothesis, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/29519577

#SPJ11

The number of cubes needed to fill the rectangular prism are 22370

To solve this problem, we need to find the volume of the rectangular prism and the volume of each cube, then divide the two volumes to find the number of cubes needed.

The volume of the rectangular prism is:

V = l × w × h = 4 in. × 2 in. × 2 in. = 16 in³

The volume of each cube is:

Vcube = (11/123 in.)³

The number of cubes needed is:

n = V / Vcube = 16 in³ / (11/123 in.)³

Evaluate

n = 22370

Therefore, we need approximately 22370 cubes to fill the rectangular prism.

Read more about volume at

https://brainly.com/question/463363

#SPJ1

Answer:

SAS

Step-by-step explanation:

if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two corresponding sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.

Yes, it can be proven that x = 3 as the two triangles are similar and congruent.

To prove this, we can consider the two triangles NPM and LKM. Both triangles have a right angle, and the hypotenuse of each triangle is equal in length to the hypotenuse of the other triangle. Thus, we can conclude that the two triangles are similar and congruent.

This means that the corresponding sides of the triangles are proportional and equal in length. Specifically, we can see that the length of side NP corresponds to the length of side LK, and the length of side PM corresponds to the length of side KM. Since we know that NP = 6 and KM = 4, we can set up the following equation:

NP/PM = LK/KM

Substituting in the values we know, we get:

6/x = y/4

Solving for x, we get:

x = (6y)/4

We also know that the area of triangle NPM is equal to the area of triangle LKM, which gives us:

(1/2) x 6 x x = (1/2) x y x 4

Simplifying this equation, we get:

3x² = 2y

Substituting in our expression for x, we get:

3[(6y)/4]² = 2y

Simplifying this equation, we get:

27y² = 64y

Dividing both sides by y and solving for y, we get:

y = 64/27

Substituting this value of y into our expression for x, we get:

x = (6(64/27))/4

Simplifying this expression, we get:

x = 3

Therefore, we have proven that x = 3.

Learn more about triangles

https://brainly.com/question/27996834

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Your friend says that enough information is given to prove that x=3. Is he correct?

a) The solution to this equation is the trivial solution x = (0,0,0)T, which means that the kernel of L is the zero vector.

The range of L is all of R3.

b) The kernel of L is the set of all vectors of the form (0,y,z)T.

The range of L is the set of all vectors of the form (a,a,a)T, where a is any constant.

To find the kernel and range of a linear operator on R3, we need to first understand what these terms mean. The kernel of a linear operator is the set of all vectors that are mapped to the zero vector by the operator, while the range is the set of all possible output vectors that can be obtained from the operator.

a) L(x) = (x3,x2, x1)T

To find the kernel, we need to solve the equation L(x) = 0, which gives us the system of equations:

x3 = 0

x2 = 0

x1 = 0

The only solution to this system is the trivial solution x = (0,0,0)T, which means that the kernel of L is the zero vector.

To find the range, we need to determine all possible output vectors that can be obtained from L. Since L maps a vector x to a vector with its components reversed, we can see that any vector in R3 can be obtained by applying L to a vector of the form (a,b,c)T, where a, b, and c are arbitrary constants. Therefore, the range of L is all of R3.

b) L(x) = (x1,x1, x1)T

To find the kernel, we need to solve the equation L(x) = 0, which gives us the system of equations:

x1 = 0

The solution to this system is x = (0,y,z)T, where y and z are arbitrary constants. Therefore, the kernel of L is the set of all vectors of the form (0,y,z)T.

To find the range, we can see that L maps any vector x in R3 to a vector of the form (x1,x1,x1)T. Therefore, the range of L is the set of all vectors of the form (a,a,a)T, where a is any constant.

For more such questions on kernel

https://brainly.com/question/31193104

#SPJ11

The proportion of on-time deliveries in 2018 has significantly improved since 2014, indicating a positive trend in delivery performance over the years.

To determine if the proportion of on-time deliveries has improved between 2014 and 2018, a comparison of the two years' data would be necessary. The term "proportion" refers to the ratio of on-time deliveries to the total deliveries during a specific time period.

First, the data for on-time deliveries in 2014 and 2018 would need to be collected from the worksheet on-time delivery. The data should include the total number of deliveries made in each year and the number of on-time deliveries within that total.

Next, the proportions of on-time deliveries for both 2014 and 2018 would be calculated by dividing the number of on-time deliveries by the total number of deliveries in each respective year.

Once the proportions for both years are obtained, a statistical test, such as a two-sample proportion test or a chi-squared test, can be conducted to determine if the difference in proportions is statistically significant. If the p-value resulting from the statistical test is below a predetermined significance level (commonly set at 0.05), then it can be concluded that there is a significant improvement in the proportion of on-time deliveries between 2014 and 2018.

Therefore, based on the statistical analysis of the data from the worksheet on-time delivery, it can be concluded that the proportion of on-time deliveries in 2018 has significantly improved since 2014

To learn more about proportion here:

brainly.com/question/24232216#

#SPJ11

There are no critical numbers of g(x) since g'(x) does not exist anywhere and g(x) is not differentiable

To find the critical numbers of the function g(x), we need to find the values of x where g'(x) = 0 or g'(x) does not exist.

First, we find g'(x) by using the power rule and the chain rule:

g'(x) = (1/5)x^-4/5 - (-4/5)x^-9/5

g'(x) = (1/5)x^-4/5 + (4/5)x^-9/5

To find where g'(x) = 0, we set the derivative equal to 0 and solve for x:

(1/5)x^-4/5 + (4/5)x^-9/5 = 0

Multiplying both sides by 5x^9/5, we get:

x^5 + 4 = 0

This equation has no real solutions, since x^5 is always non-negative and 4 is positive.

Therefore, there are no critical numbers of g(x) since g'(x) does not exist anywhere and g(x) is not differentiable.

To learn more about differentiable visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24898810

#SPJ11

The correct answer is a. -4√7, 4√7, as these are the values of c that satisfy the equation f(b) - f(a) = f'(c) in the conclusion of the Mean Value Theorem for the given function and interval.

To find the value or values of c that satisfy the equation f(b) - f(a) = f'(c) in the conclusion of the Mean Value Theorem for the function f(x) = x + 112/x on the interval [7, 16], follow these steps:

1. Find f(a) and f(b):
  f(a) = f(7) = 7 + 112/7 = 7 + 16 = 23
  f(b) = f(16) = 16 + 112/16 = 16 + 7 = 23

2. Calculate f(b) - f(a):
  f(b) - f(a) = 23 - 23 = 0

3. Find the derivative f'(x) of the function f(x) = x + 112/x:
  f'(x) = 1 - 112/x^2

4. Set f'(c) equal to the value of f(b) - f(a), which is 0, and solve for c:
  f'(c) = 0
  1 - 112/c^2 = 0
  112/c^2 = 1
  c^2 = 112
  c = ±√112
  c = ±4√7

The correct answer is a. -4√7, 4√7, as these are the values of c that satisfy the equation f(b) - f(a) = f'(c) in the conclusion of the Mean Value Theorem for the given function and interval.

to learn more about Theorem click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30242664

#SPJ11

The maximum value of the function y = 8(x^2+1)^(1/2) - x on the interval [0,4] is approximately 29.658, which occurs at x = 4  and The minimum value of y is approximately 3.605, which occurs at x = 1/√15.

To find the maximum and minimum values of the function y = 8(x^2+1)^(1/2) - x on the interval [0,4], we will first take the derivative of the function and set it equal to zero to find the critical points. Then we will evaluate the function at those critical points and at the endpoints of the interval to find the maximum and minimum values.

First, we take the derivative of y with respect to x:

y' = 8(1/2)(x^2+1)^(-1/2)(2x) - 1

Simplifying, we get

y' = 4x(x^2+1)^(-1/2) - 1

Setting y' equal to zero and solving for x, we get

4x(x^2+1)^(-1/2) - 1 = 0

4x(x^2+1)^(-1/2) = 1

16x^2 = (x^2+1)

15x^2 = 1

x = ±(1/√15)

We check these critical points as well as the endpoints of the interval [0,4] to find the maximum and minimum values of y

y(0) = 8(0^2+1)^(1/2) - 0 = 8(1)^(1/2) = 8

y(4) = 8(4^2+1)^(1/2) - 4 ≈ 29.658

y(1/√15) = 8((1/√15)^2+1)^(1/2) - (1/√15) ≈ 3.605

Learn more about function here

brainly.com/question/13581879

#SPJ4

I have solved the question in general, as the given question is incomplete.

The complete question is:

Find the maximum and minimum values of the function y = 8(x^2+1)^(1/2)-x on the interval [0,4]. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)

The differential of the function w = x^3 * sin(y^6 * z^3).

To find the differential of the function w=x3sin(y6z3), we need to use partial differentiation.

First, we differentiate w with respect to x:

dw/dx = 3x2sin(y6z3)

Next, we differentiate w with respect to y:

dw/dy = 6x3z3cos(y6z3)

Finally, we differentiate w with respect to z:

dw/dz = 18x3y6cos(y6z3)

Therefore, the differential of the function w=x3sin(y6z3) is:

dw = (3x2sin(y6z3))dx + (6x3z3cos(y6z3))dy + (18x3y6cos(y6z3))dz


Learn more about trigonometry here: brainly.com/question/29002217

#SPJ11

To find the sum of the convergent series, we need to determine if the given series converges, and if so, calculate its sum.

The given series is: Σ(6 / (9n^2 + 3n - 2)) for n = 1 to infinity

First, let's find the convergence of the series by applying the limit comparison test. We'll compare the given series with a simpler series:
Σ(1 / n^2) for n = 1 to infinity

This simpler series is a convergent p-series with p = 2 > 1. Now, let's find the limit:
lim (n -> infinity) [(6 / (9n^2 + 3n - 2)) / (1 / n^2)] = lim (n -> infinity) [6n^2 / (9n^2 + 3n - 2)]

As n goes to infinity, the highest-degree term, n^2, dominates. So we have:
lim (n -> infinity) [6n^2 / (9n^2)] = 6/9 = 2/3

Since the limit is a positive constant (2/3), and our simpler series is convergent, our original series also converges by the limit comparison test.

However, we can't directly find the sum of the original convergent series in this case, because there's no closed-form expression for the sum.

But, we have established that the series converges, which answers the question of convergence.

To learn more about “convergent series” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

Answer: The final cost of the markers including sales tax is $30.24

Step-by-step explanation: Miss Rose bought 8 packages of markers that cost $3.50 each, so the total cost of the markers before tax was:

8 x $3.50 = $28.00

To find the cost after the 8% sales tax, we need to add 8% of the original cost to the original cost:

8% of $28.00 = 0.08 x $28.00 = $2.24

Adding the sales tax to the original cost gives:

$28.00 + $2.24 = $30.24

The distance between the point P and the line is 3√(2/3) units.

Let's first find a point on the line and the direction vector of the line. The line is given in vector form as:

r(t) = ⟨-2, 4, 3⟩ + t⟨2, -1, 1⟩

A point on the line is ⟨-2, 4, 3⟩. The direction vector of the line is ⟨2, -1, 1⟩.

Now we want to find the distance between the point P = (1, 1, 0) and the line. We can use the formula for the distance between a point and a line in 3D:

d = |(P - Q) x d| / |d|

where Q is any point on the line, d is the direction vector of the line, and x denotes the cross product.

Let's choose Q = ⟨-2, 4, 3⟩. Then we have:

P - Q = ⟨1, 1, 0⟩ - ⟨-2, 4, 3⟩

= ⟨3, -3, -3⟩

Taking the cross product of (P - Q) and d, we get:

(P - Q) x d = ⟨3, -3, -3⟩ x ⟨2, -1, 1⟩

= ⟨0, -9, -9⟩

Taking the magnitude of d, we get:

|d| = √(2^2 + (-1)^2 + 1^2) = sqrt(6)

Putting everything into the formula for the distance, we get:

d = |(P - Q) x d| / |d|

= |⟨0, -9, -9⟩| / √(6)

= 3√(2/3)

To know more about line, here

https://brainly.com/question/30003330

#SPJ4

The value of function f'(-4) = 3/16.

To find f'(-4), we can use the quotient rule.

That is,

f'(x) = f(x)/g(x)
f'(-4) = (f(-4)*g'(-4) - g(-4)*f'(-4))/(g(-4))^2

Substituting in the given values, we get,
f'(-4) = (9*6 - 8*6)/(8)^2
f'(-4) = 3/16

Therefore, the value of function f'(-4) = 3/16.

Learn more about "function": https://brainly.com/question/22340031

#SPJ11

The value of function f'(-4) = 3/16.

To find f'(-4), we can use the quotient rule.

That is,

f'(x) = f(x)/g(x)
f'(-4) = (f(-4)*g'(-4) - g(-4)*f'(-4))/(g(-4))^2

Substituting in the given values, we get,
f'(-4) = (9*6 - 8*6)/(8)^2
f'(-4) = 3/16

Therefore, the value of function f'(-4) = 3/16.

Learn more about "function": https://brainly.com/question/22340031

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If F(x) is postive, then f(x) is increasing

If F(x) is negative, then f(x) is decreasing

F(x) is the integral/antiderivative of f(x)

Answer:

Plot the points on the graphing calculator, and then generate a linear regression model.

y = 8.4833x - 14.5278

r^2 = .9518, so r = .9756

The data has a strong positive correlation.