A shelf is designed so it will fit in a 90º corner between two walls. The shelf has dimensions, rounded to the nearest tenth, as shown. A triangle has side lengths 11 centimeters, 11 centimeters, and hypotenuse of StartRoot 242 EndRoot centimeters. [Not drawn to scale] Will the shelf fit snugly in a 90º corner?

Answer:

4 hours and a half. 4 hours and 30 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4hrs 30 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

6hrs = 372miles

372 ÷ 6 = 62

1hr = 62 miles

62 x 4hrs = 248 miles

You need to 279 miles. 0.5 = 30 minutes.

Answer:

1 /1 ; 360°

Step-by-step explanation:

Start time = 2:30 pm

Stop time = 3:30 pm

Minute hand makes a complete revolution per hour ;

This means that the minutes hand revolves round the whole circle in one hour, hence fraction of the circle covered by the minute hand between 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm is 1/1 = 1

The angle turned by the minutes hand :

1 complete revolution = 360°

A circle covers 360°

1 /1 fraction of a circle = 1/1 * 360° = 360°

Hence, angle turned by the minute hand = 360°

Answer: 20°  &  70°

Step-by-step explanation:

We know complementary angles will add up to 90° and we also know we can divide the total by 9 parts because our ratio is 2 parts to every 7 parts.

To find each individual part size...

9x=90

x=10

so use our ratio...

2x10=20  for first angle

7x10=70 for second angle

Answer:

432 each.

Step-by-step explanation:

You make 20% .2%

Answer: the amount of socks they will collect in four days is less than the amount of socks they plant to collect, in other words 915<1500 socks.

Step-by-step explanation:

If they collect 183 pairs of socks in one day, and there are four days left, then 183 x 5 = 915 (pairs of socks) in five days. They need to collect 1,500 pairs.

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6.25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

F= 1 /4 y+ 9 /4

Step-by-step explanation:

brainliest?

Answer:

It is really hard to see the picture

Step-by-step explanation:

Could you also give the choices to the answers that are possible? It would help out a lot. Just lmk in the comments and then I will revise my answer :)

Answer:

Part A: The appropriate measure of center to describe the distribution of the data would be, median.

Part B: The appropriate measure of spread to describe the distribution of data would be, interquartile range.

Part C: The box plot represents the data. Calculate the appropriate measure of spread, IQR = 13

Got it right on math nation. Hope this helps!

Answer:

htgjyk

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A) 36 inches

36 Incheon is the correct answer

Answer:

D.) 64pi in.³

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it right in quiz, trust me.

I hope this helps! ^^

Answer:

divide 7/100 which is 0.07

multiply that by 13.75, and you get 0.96

13.75+0.96= $13.20

(this is including sales tax)

Answer:

$12.78

Step-by-step explanation:

I THINK you are supposed to multiply the original price (13.75) by the sales tax as a decimal (0.07) and then subtract that answer from, the original, amount.

Answer:

c) 33

Step-by-step explanation:

We can calculate supplementary angles by subtracting the given angle from 180°. To find the other angle (in your case, ∠e), use the ∠y = 180° – ∠x where ∠x is the given angle.

Answer:

c)33

Step-by-step explanation:

20-10=10

10-3=7

7cm

Then the volume is 7cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The square root of 8 - 2i, with the real part of the answer being positive, is approximately 2.34 + 0.52i.

To find the square root of 8 - 2i, we can represent the complex number in its polar form and then apply the square root operation.

First, we calculate the magnitude (r) and argument (θ) of the complex number 8 - 2i:

Magnitude: |8 - 2i| = √([tex]8^2[/tex] + (-2[tex])^2[/tex]) = √(64 + 4) = √68 = 2√17

Argument: θ = arctan(-2/8) = arctan(-1/4) ≈ -0.24498 radians

Next, we express the complex number in polar form:

8 - 2i = 2√17 * (cos(-0.24498) + isin(-0.24498))

To find the square root, we take the square root of the magnitude and divide the argument by 2:

√(8 - 2i) ≈ √(2√17) * (cos(-0.24498/2) + isin(-0.24498/2))

Simplifying the expression:

√(8 - 2i) ≈ √(2√17) * (cos(-0.12249) + isin(-0.12249))

≈ 2.34 + 0.52i

Therefore, the square root of 8 - 2i, with the real part of the answer being positive, is approximately 2.34 + 0.52i.

Learn more about complex here:

https://brainly.com/question/20566728

#SPJ11

The preparation workshop’s impact on first-time composite scores can be assessed by evaluating the scores of a group of 30 high school seniors who retake the Miller Analogies Test (MAT) after attending the workshop.

The MAT is taken twice by each student: once before the workshop and once after it. The scores are reported on a ratio scale.
To check if there has been a significant change in scores, the following steps can be followed:

Step 1: To determine the change in scores, subtract the scores obtained before the workshop from the scores obtained after the workshop.

Step 2: Calculate the average score change for the group of 30 students by dividing the sum of score changes by 30.

Step 3: Calculate the standard deviation of the score change by using the following formula:
SD = √[∑ (Xi - X)2 / (n - 1)]
where Xi is the individual score change, X is the average score change, and n is the number of students.

Step 4: Use a t-test to determine if the change in scores is statistically significant. If the t-value is greater than the critical value (using a 5% significance level and 29 degrees of freedom), then the change in scores is significant.
Thus, by following these steps, the impact of the preparation workshop on first-time composite scores of the MAT can be assessed.

To know more about ratio scale, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31315229

#SPJ11

The paired t-test is the appropriate statistical analysis to use for this type of data.

The first step to check for a significant change over first-time composite scores when a group of 30 high school seniors retake the Miller Analogies Test (MAT) after completing a Test Preparation Workshop, note that each student will have taken the MAT twice, once before and once following the workshop, and the scores are on a ratio scale is to compute the ratio of the scores before and after the workshop for each student.

Then, calculate the mean and standard deviation of the ratios.

Finally, conduct a paired t-test to determine if the mean ratio is significantly different from 1 at the 0.05 level of significance.

The paired t-test is the appropriate statistical analysis to use for this type of data.

To know more about t-test, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31829815

#SPJ11

Let's denote the lengths of the legs of the right triangle as a and b, and the length of the hypotenuse as c. We are given that the altitude perpendicular to the hypotenuse is 12 cm.

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we have:

[tex]a^2 + b^2 = c^2[/tex]

The perimeter of the right triangle is given by:

Perimeter = a + b + c

We want to express the length of the hypotenuse (c) as a function of the perimeter.

Rearranging the equation for the perimeter, we have:

c = Perimeter - (a + b)

Substituting the equation for c into the Pythagorean theorem equation, we get:

[tex]a^2 + b^2[/tex] = (Perimeter - [tex](a + b))^2[/tex]

Expanding and simplifying, we have:

[tex]a^2 + b^2[/tex]= [tex]Perimeter^2[/tex] - 2Perimeter(a + b) +[tex](a + b)^2[/tex]

Simplifying further:

[tex]a^2 + b^2[/tex]= [tex]Perimeter^2[/tex]- 2Perimeter(a + b) + a^2 + 2ab + b^2

The terms with [tex]a^2[/tex] and [tex]b^2[/tex]cancel out, giving:

[tex]2ab = Perimeter^2 - 2Perimeter(a + b)[/tex]

Dividing both sides by 2, we have:

[tex]ab = (Perimeter^2 - 2Perimeter(a + b))/2[/tex]

[tex]ab = (Perimeter^2 - 2Perimeter(a + b))/2[/tex]

Now, since we are given that the altitude perpendicular to the hypotenuse is 12 cm, we know that:

ab = [tex]12^2 = 144[/tex]

We can solve this equation for either a or b, and then substitute the value into the expression for the hypotenuse (c):

For example, let's solve for a:

a = 144/b

Substituting this into the expression for c

c = Perimeter - (a + b)

c = Perimeter - (144/b + b)

Therefore, the length of the hypotenuse (c) can be expressed as a function of the perimeter.

Learn more about Pythagorean here:

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

the the height should be 16 cm I used the Pythagoras theory thank you.

Answer:

30.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: i dont know

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: $8 bowl, noodles, bean sprouts, beef

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x ≈ 9.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Using Pythagoras' identity in the right triangle, that is

x² + 14² = 17²

x² + 196 = 289 ( subtract 196 from both sides )

x² = 93 ( take the square root of both sides )

x = [tex]\sqrt{93}[/tex] ≈ 9.6 (to the nearest tenth )

The Volterra integral equation:

x(t) - xo = ∫[to, t] y(s) ds

y(t) - x₁ = ∫[to, t] f(s, x(s)) ds

(a) To write the initial value problem dx = f(t, x), x(to) = xo dt as an integral equation, we can use the integral representation of the solution.

Let's consider the integral equation:

x(t) = xo + ∫[to, t] f(s, x(s)) ds

This integral equation is of the Volterra type, as it involves a definite integral and depends on the function x(s) evaluated over the interval [to, t].

(b) To transform the second-order initial value problem d²x/dt² = f(t, x), x(to) = xo, x'(to) = x₁ into a Volterra integral equation, we can introduce a new variable, y(t), defined as the derivative of x(t):

y(t) = dx/dt

Now, we can rewrite the second-order differential equation as a system of first-order differential equations:

dx/dt = y(t)

dy/dt = f(t, x)

To represent this system as an integral equation, we'll integrate both equations from to to t.

This yields:

x(t) - xo = ∫[to, t] y(s) ds

y(t) - x₁ = ∫[to, t] f(s, x(s)) ds

Combining these two equations, we obtain the Volterra integral equation:

x(t) - xo = ∫[to, t] y(s) ds

y(t) - x₁ = ∫[to, t] f(s, x(s)) ds

This integral equation is also of the Volterra type, involving definite integrals and depending on the functions x(s) and y(s) evaluated over the interval [to, t].

Learn more about Volterra integral equation click;

https://brainly.com/question/32259957

#SPJ1

Answer:

46 + W = 231

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

My guess: 231 = 46 + b

Step-by-step explanation: Because they didn't mention how many were colored brown, we would use a variable to represent them, in this case I use b. But we do know 46 of them were white. so the equation would simply be 231 = 46 + b. After you add 46 and b you will get the total to 231. You can find b from subtracting 231 to 46. Then add b to 46 and get the total of 231

Answer:

7: 15

Step-by-step explanation:

For a small change in x (dx), the corresponding change in y (dy) is given by the equation dy = (6x² - 4)dx.

To find the relationship between a small change in x (dx) and the corresponding change in y (dy) for the function f(x) = 2x³ - 4x, we can differentiate the function with respect to x.

f(x) = 2x³ - 4x

Differentiating both sides with respect to x:

f'(x) = d/dx (2x³ - 4x)

f'(x) = 6x² - 4

Now, we can express the relationship between dx and dy in the form of dy = f'(x)dx:

dy = (6x² - 4)dx

Therefore, for a small change in x (dx), the corresponding change in y (dy) is given by the equation dy = (6x² - 4)dx.

Learn more about Derivative here

https://brainly.com/question/31308059

#SPJ4

Given two predictor variables with a correlation of 0.32879, we should expect there to be multicollinearity between them.

In a data set with a, b, c, d, e, and f numeric variables, given there is a strong correlation of these pairs (f, a), (f, c), (d, e), (a, d), we can set up a regression model as

Of-a + c Of-a + b + c + d + e Of-a + C + d + e Of-a + C + e.

Given two predictor variables with a correlation of 0.32879, we should expect there is multicollinearity between them.

The statement that is true regarding the given two predictor variables with a correlation of 0.32879 is:

we should expect there to be multicollinearity between them.

Multicollinearity is a situation in which two or more predictor variables in a multiple regression model are highly correlated with one another. Multicollinearity complicates the understanding of which predictor variables are significant in the regression model's estimation.

Therefore, given two predictor variables with a correlation of 0.32879, we should expect there to be multicollinearity between them.

To know more about  multicollinearity visit:

https://brainly.in/question/7285022

#SPJ11

Answer:

11:00 AM+ 50 minutes= 11:50

11:50 AM+30 minutes= 12:20

Step-by-step explanation:

Gloria went to the mall and spent 50 minutes shopping. Then she had lunch for 30 minutes. If Gloria arrived at the mall at 11:00 A.M., at what time did she finish lunch?