How did Alfred E. Smith feel about the impact of the New Deal on the
government?
Explanation:
Smith sought the 1932 Democratic presidential nomination but was defeated by Franklin D. Roosevelt, his former ally and successor as Governor of New York. Smith then entered business in New York City, became involved in the construction and promotion of the Empire State Building, and became an increasingly vocal opponent of Roosevelt's New Deal.
Any suggestions? If so say left, middle, or right.
10 points per answer! Please help :)
Answer:
The picture will explain
Explanation:
which of the following are characteristics of Christianity?
roots in Judaism
monotheistic
roots and Islam
polytheistic
life after death
Answer:
life after death
Explanation:
John 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only son that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
What were the consequences of the Cuban missile crisis ? In the Cold War
how did eugene talmadge feel about the new deal
Answer:
After he was stricken with polio, Roosevelt began visiting the therapeutic waters of Warm Springs in the mid-1920s to strengthen his paralyzed legs. He established the Warm Springs Foundation (later the Roosevelt Warm Springs Institute for Rehabilitation), and he became actively involved in the local community. Through Warm Springs, Roosevelt began to study the connections between Georgia's difficult agricultural conditions and its social and educational problems. His New Deal programs, begun immediately upon his inauguration in 1933 and aimed first at economic recovery, would ultimately address the nation's and Georgia's social conditions as well.
Answer:
After he was stricken with polio, Roosevelt began visiting the therapeutic waters of Warm Springs in the mid-1920s to strengthen his paralyzed legs.
Explanation:
What decisions were made at the Berlin Conference
How are the boundaries drawn during the Berlin Conference to blame for the political unrest in modern Africa?
Answer:
Login
ArticleAdditional Info
HomeWorld HistoryGlobal Exploration
Berlin West Africa Conference
European history
Cite Share More
WRITTEN BY
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree....
See Article History
Alternative Title: Berlin Conference
Berlin West Africa Conference, a series of negotiations (Nov. 15, 1884–Feb. 26, 1885) at Berlin, in which the major European nations met to decide all questions connected with the Congo River basin in Central Africa.


Berlin West Africa Conference
QUICK FACTS
DATE
November 15, 1884 - February 26, 1885
LOCATION
Berlin
Germany
PARTICIPANTS
France
Germany
Portugal
United Kingdom
RELATED TOPICS
Western colonialism
Congo Free State
Portugal
The conference, proposed by Portugal in pursuance of its special claim to control of the Congo estuary, was necessitated by the jealousy and suspicion with which the great European powers viewed one another’s attempts at colonial expansion in Africa. The general act of the Conference of Berlin declared the Congo River basin to be neutral (a fact that in no way deterred the Allies from extending the war into that area in World War I); guaranteed freedom for trade and shipping for all states in the basin; forbade slave trading; and rejected Portugal’s claims to the Congo River estuary—thereby making possible the founding of the independent Congo Free State, to which Great Britain, France, and Germany had already agreed in principle.
what is the most dangerous mammal on earth
little hint most scientists don't know this answer
no pressure
Answer:
Humans
Explanation:
Apparently my response needs to be 20 characters long.
which army did many freed slaves and free men of color join
Answer:
The Union Army, ( or Union Blue ).
Explanation:
Nearly 180,000 free black men and escaped slaves served in the Union Army during the Civil War.
Hope this helps!
The U.S. president gives a speech to a group of students about the
importance of schools. The speech comes less than a week after a study
found that U.S. students performed lower than students in other countries.
Which statement best describes the context of the president's speech?
A. The country is concerned about bullying in American schools.
B. The country is concerned that students aren't able to pay for
college
C. The country is concerned the president isn't an effective leader.
D. The country is concerned about students' performance in school.
Answer:
D: The country is concerned about students' performance in school.
Explanation:
A is a silly answer, The study had nothing to do with finachial problems, and C is also a silly answer. D is the best answer.
And i got it right on AP3X
Х
test
What types of networks allowed for the exchange of goods and ideas between our early foraging
ancestors?
Choose 1 answer:
Village networks
Metropolitan networks
Language networks
Cultural networks
Answer:
asss(d ajakakks ssjxjdiidi subsided sjdjdjdj shsnbsns jsjdjs
In our society today gun violence is a major issue. What do you feel that we can do to decrease this issue? Do you feel that the steady rise in gun violence cause police officers to be more hostile when approaching people? Do you feel that we will eventually become lawless? 350+ words
Answer:
La violencia con armas de fuego es un problema contemporáneo de derechos humanos de alcance mundial que amenaza el derecho más fundamental de todo ser humano, el derecho a la vida.
La violencia con armas de fuego es una tragedia cotidiana que afecta a la vida de las personas en todo el mundo y causa la muerte de más de 500 personas cada día.
La violencia con armas de fuego puede afectar a cualquier persona, pero, en ciertas situaciones, afecta de forma desproporcionada a las comunidades de color, a las mujeres y a otros grupos marginados de la sociedad.
En ocasiones, la mera presencia de armas de fuego puede hacer que las personas se sientan amenazadas o que teman por su vida, lo que acarrea graves repercusiones psicológicas a largo plazo a nivel individual y comunitario.
El miedo a la violencia con armas de fuego también puede socavar el derecho a la educación o el derecho a la salud cuando las personas temen ir a la escuela o a los centros de salud o si estos servicios no funcionan adecuadamente debido a la violencia armada en la comunidad.
Amnistía Internacional hace campaña en favor de leyes e intervenciones efectivas para prevenir y poner fin a la violencia con armas de fuego.
Una estricta regulación de las armas de fuego junto con iniciativas estratégicas de reducción de la violencia son la forma más eficaz de reducir la violencia armada.
El acceso fácil a las armas de fuego, ya sea legal o ilegal, es uno de los principales motivos de la violencia armada.
Los gobiernos tienen la obligación de extremar la protección de los derechos humanos y crear un entorno lo más seguro posible para la mayoría de la población, especialmente para las personas consideradas más vulnerables. Un gobierno que no controla de forma adecuada la posesión y el empleo de armas de fuego en una situación persistente de violencia armada podría incumplir sus obligaciones en virtud del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos.
Por eso Amnistía Internacional pide a los Estados que cumplan sus obligaciones y establezcan y apliquen leyes y normas estrictas para la prevención de la violencia con armas de fuego. Los Estados también tienen la obligación de establecer medidas de intervención a nivel comunitario para reducir y prevenir la violencia armada en la vida cotidiana de las personas.
Amnistía Internacional hace campaña para que los gobiernos lleven a cabo reformas legislativas sensatas en materia de armas para poner fin a la violencia armada y proteger el derecho a la vida de las personas. Nuestros derechos humanos no están protegidos si nuestros gobernantes no ponen fin a la violencia armada y a las muertes causadas por armas de fuego.
Explanation:
Is this answer correct^
Answer:
Yes you are Correct
Explanation:
The Korean Army poured on the 38th Parallels
Which caused the conflict with the South and north.
Bye!
Write a two-paragraph "advertisement" telling people why they should move to Oregon and why they should choose you to guide them.
Answer:
In the 1830s, several parties of Americans traveled to Oregon, further establishing the Oregon Trail. Many of these emigrants were missionaries seeking to convert natives to Christianity. Jason Lee was the first, traveling in Nathaniel Jarvis Wyeth's party in 1833 and establishing the Oregon Mission in the Willamette Valley; the Whitmans and Spaldings arrived in 1836, establishing the Whitman Mission east of the Cascades. In 1839 the Peoria Party embarked for Oregon from Illinois.
In 1841, wealthy master trapper and entrepreneur Ewing Young died without a will, and there was no system to probate his estate. A probate government was proposed at a meeting after Young's funeral. Doctor Ira Babcock of Jason Lee's Methodist Mission was elected Supreme Judge. Babcock chaired two meetings in 1842 at Champoeg (halfway between Lee's mission and Oregon City) to discuss wolves and other animals of contemporary concern. These meetings were precursors to an all-citizen meeting in 1843, which instituted a provisional government headed by an executive committee made up of David Hill, Alanson Beers, and Joseph Gale. This government was the first acting public government of the Oregon Country before American annexation.
Explanation:
Are the statements about the effects of railroads in the late 1800s true or false?
The expansion of railways lowered the cost of shipping goods.
Railroad mileage increased in the West, reducing the effects of settlement on American Indians.
The building of the railroads changed the environment of the West.
The Transcontinental Railroad was completed before the Civil War ended.
The expansion of railways meant manufacturers could ship goods cheaply.
The building of the railroads changed the environment of the West.
These are true
others are false
Answer:
true false true false
Explanation:
what was the important outcome of the US Supreme Court's decision in Miranda vs Arizona
Answer:
People in questioning were told their constitutional rights
Explanation:
In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
answer the question for 15 points and brainlest
Answer:
Enbargo
Explanation:
An Act laying an Embargo on all ships and vessels in the ports and harbors of the United States. The Embargo Act of 1807 was a general trade embargo on all foreign nations that was enacted by the United States Congress. Congress imposed the embargo in direct response to these events. ...
in this quote what is the goal bartolome de la casas speak of
Henry goes to a restaurant and the subtotal on the bill was xx dollars. A tax of 8% is applied to the bill. Henry decides to leave a tip of 21% on the entire bill (including the tax). Write an expression in terms of xx that represents the total amount that Henry paid.
Answer:
y+21% of y
Explanation:
Answer:
y+21% of y
Have an good day!
can someone please help me
Answer:
D (i think)
Explanation:
In a nuclear power plant, water is:
used to cool down uranium pellets
used to turn turbines
heated and changed into steam
cooled and changed into ice
Answer: used to turn turbines
Explanation:
the industrial Revolution resulted in
A-hand made goods
B-a great migration of people from rural areas to cities
C-more time for people to spend with their
families
D-a shortage of workers on farms
Answer:
I believe the answer is B - a great migration of people from rural areas to cities.
I hope this is helpful.
Forty years after his conviction, Fred Korematsu once again decided to challenge it. Korematsu's conviction was overturned by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the same Court that had originally convicted him. The case was heard as a corum nobis case. A writ of corum nobis is a remedy used only in special circumstances to correct errors in a criminal conviction.
The court ruled that newly uncovered evidence revealed the existence of a manifest injustice which—had it been known at the time—would likely have changed the Supreme Court's decision. The decision rested on a series of documents recovered from the National Archives showing that the government had withheld important and relevant information from the Supreme Court that demonstrated that the Army had altered evidence to make it appear that Japanese Americans posed a greater threat of spying and disloyalty.
It is important to note that the corum nobis decision overturned Korematsu's conviction based on the faulty evidence, but did not overturn the constitutionality of the Supreme Court's decision. Why do you think the District Court did this? What do you think the Supreme Court should do with the evidence that showed what the Army did to the Japanese Americans living there during WWII?
Answer: About 10 weeks after the U.S. entered World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942 signed Executive Order 9066. The order authorized the Secretary of War and the armed forces to remove people of Japanese ancestry from what they designated as military areas and surrounding communities in the United States. These areas were legally off limits to Japanese aliens and Japanese-American citizens.
The order set in motion the mass transportation and relocation of more than 120,000 Japanese people to sites the government called detention camps that were set up and occupied in about 14 weeks. Most of the people who were relocated lived on the West Coast and two-thirds were American citizens. In accordance with the order, the military transported them to some 26 sites in seven western states, including remote locations in Washington, Idaho, Utah, and Arizona.
Explanation:
why did the french revolution ultimately fail to produce the results of the american revolution
Answer:
please give me brainlist and follow
Explanation:
War and massacres also spread throughout France during this time. Many lives were lost trying to create this successful government. The French Revolution was a failure because of the abolishing of new leaders, the massacres brought upon France, and the inability to create a stable government and solve their problems.
explain how the Renaissance changed European society
Answer:
Some of the greatest thinkers, authors, statesmen, scientists, and artists in human history thrived during this era, while global exploration opened up new lands and cultures to European commerce. The Renaissance is credited with bridging the gap between the Middle Ages and modern-day civilization.
Explanation:
What is an appeal in the court system?
Answer:
In law, an appeal is a process in which cases are reviewed by a higher authority, where parties request a formal change to an official decision.
Explanation:
Appeals function both as a process for error correction as well as a process of clarifying and interpreting the law. Although appellate courts have existed for thousands of years, common law countries did not incorporate an affirmative right to appeal into their jurisprudence until the 19th century
What is meant by the statement, "no taxation without representation"?
A. Colonists could not pass tax laws against the British.
B. Colonists were opposed to all types of taxes.
C. Colonists objected to paying taxes levied by a parliament they did not elect.
[tex]\huge\colorbox{blue}{Answer;} [/tex]
What is meant by the statement, "no taxation without representation"?
»C. Colonists objected to paying taxes levied by a parliament they did not elect.Can Somebody help me PLEASE
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It's just a lucky guess since I already learned this a few months ago.
The Missouri Compromise, the
Compromise of 1850 and the
Kansas-Nebraska Act were all
efforts to...
that belongs to the people
a. Encourage manufacturing in the west
b. Increase the number of people who voted in
presidential elections
C. Settle disputes over the spread of slavery in
the western territories
d. End fighting amongst Midwestern farmers
I need the answers fast!! Please help
Answer:
C.Settle disputes and spread slavery
PLEASE HELP THIS IS TIMED!!!
Which Latin American Empire - the Aztecs, Incas, and Maya - had the most impressive technology?
Answer:
Aztecs
Explanation:
The Aztecs were more advanced due to their maintenance of power, military and religion
Answer:
Aztec
Explanation:
In conclusion The Aztec empire is more advanced than the Inca empire beacuse of their religion,maintainance in power and military.
People everywhere share the same ancestors; Adam and Eve.
TrueFalse
Answer:
True
Explanation: