Aging workers of the Neotropical termite, Neocapritermes taracua, develop blue crystal containing glands ("backpacks") on their backs, When they fight intruding termites and are hampered, these "blue" termites explode, and the glands spew a sticky liquid (Sobotnik et al. 2012). The following data are from an experiment that measured the toxicity of the blue substance. A single drop of the liquid extracted from blue termites was placed on individuals of a second termite species, Labiotermes labralis, and the number that were immobilized (dead or paralyzed) within 60 minutes was recorded. The frequency of this outcome was compared with a control treatment in which liquid from glands of "white" termites lacking the blue crystals was dropped instead.
Is the blue liquid toxic compared to liquid from white termites?
Liquid source Unharmed Immobilized
Blue workers 3 37
White workers 31 9

Answer:

$22

Step-by-step explanation:

20 * 1.10 = 22

I think the the answer is 20

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]÷6[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

First, simplify the 6[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] to an improper fraction, which is:

[tex]\frac{27}{4}[/tex]

Next rewrite the equation using the improper fraction:

[tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]÷[tex]\frac{27}{4}[/tex]

Now, in order to divide the fraction, we will need to flip the second fraction over, and then multiply the two fractions together. A great way to remember this is the phrase Copy Dot Flip - Copy the first fraction, put a dot for multiplication, and flip the second fraction.

[tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]·[tex]\frac{4}{27}[/tex]

Finally, multiply together and simplify/reduce if needed:

The final answer is [tex]\frac{32}{135}[/tex] and no simplification or reduction is needed

Answer:

800000

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: p=16

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

m=5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1:

9 = 2m + 2 - 3        Equation

Step 2:

9 = 2m - 1        Combine Like Terms

Step 3:

10 = 2m       Add 1 on both sides

Step 4:

m = 10 ÷ 2       Divide

Answer:

m = 5

Hope This Helps :)

Answer:

$136.

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide how much they made by the # of hours. 306/18=17. Multiply the amount per hour 17 by the 8 hours of work. 17x8=136.

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

g(1)=-2-1

g(1)=-3

Brainliest appreciated!

Answer:

The sequence is geometric

The common ratio is 0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

In the arithmetic sequence, there is a common difference between each two consecutive terms

In the geometric sequence, there is a common ratio between each two consecutive terms

Let us check the given sequence

∵ The first 3 terms are 12, 6, 3

∵ 6 - 12 = -6

∵ 3 - 6 = -3

∵ There is no common difference between the consecutive terms

∴ The sequence is not an arithmetic sequence

∵ 6 ÷ 12 = 0.5

∵ 3 ÷ 6 = 0.5

∴ There is a common ratio between each two consecutive terms

∴ The sequence is a geometric sequence

∴ The common ratio is 0.5

Given sequence is geometric sequence and common ratio between consecutive term is  [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] .

In Arithmetic sequence , common difference between consecutive terms should be equal.

In Geometric sequence, common ratio between consecutive terms should be equal.

Given sequence,     12, 6, 3, ...

  Since, common difference =  [tex]6-12\neq 3-6[/tex] , this is not arithmetic sequence.

Common ratio =     [tex]\frac{6}{12}=\frac{3}{6}=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]  Because common ratio is are equal. Thus, given sequence is geometric sequence.

Learn more about sequence here :

https://brainly.com/question/17648677

Answer:

115 children

Step-by-step explanation:

Please see the attached picture for the full solution.

Answer:

non - collinear points

Step-by-step explanation:

points that dont lie on the same line

Complete Question

The complete question is shown on the first , second and third uploaded image

Answer:

A

 The correct option is A

B

  The correct option is H

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o  :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 =  6[/tex]

The alternative  hypothesis is  [tex]H_a  :  \mu_1 - \mu_2 \ne  6[/tex]      

The population mean difference is  [tex]\mu_d  =  6[/tex]

Generally the sample size is  n =  15      

Generally the sample mean for input temperature is mathematically represented as

      [tex]\= x _1  = \frac{\sum x_i }{n}[/tex]

=>    [tex]\= x _1  = \frac{57.6 + 68.9 + \cdots +60.4  }{15}[/tex]  

=>    [tex]\= x _1  = 62.57 [/tex]  

Generally the sample mean for output temperature is mathematically represented as

      [tex]\= x _2  = \frac{\sum x_i }{n}[/tex]

=>    [tex]\= x _2  = \frac{65.1+ 74.4 + \cdots +67.3 }{15}[/tex]  

=>    [tex]\= x _2  = 55.97 [/tex]  

Generally the sample mean difference is mathematically represented as

   [tex]\= d = 62.57 - 55.97[/tex]

=>[tex]d = 6.6[/tex]

Generally the standard deviation is mathematically represented as

       [tex]s_d  =  \sqrt{\frac{ \sum [d_1 - \= d]^2}{n-1} }[/tex]

=>    [tex]s_d  =  \sqrt{\frac{ [ [57.6 -65.1]- 6.6]^2 +[68.9 -74.4]- 6.6]^2+\cdots +   [60.4 -67.3]- 6.6]^2}{15-1} }[/tex]

=>     [tex]s_d  = 1.732 [/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

      [tex]t =  \frac{6.6  - 6 }{\frac{1.732}{\sqrt{15} } }[/tex]

=>   [tex]t = 1.342 [/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

    [tex]df  = n -  1[/tex]

So

      [tex]df  =  15  -  2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df  =  14[/tex]

Generally the p-value  is mathematically represented as

     [tex]p-value  = 2 *  P(t >  1.342 )[/tex]

Generally from the t -distribution table the probability of 1.342 at a degree of freedom of  [tex]df  =  28[/tex] is  

       [tex]P(t >  1.342 ) = 0.10047[/tex]

So

     [tex]p-value  = 2 * 0.10047[/tex]

=>   [tex]p-value  = 0.201[/tex]

Generally from the value  obtained we see that [tex]p-value  > \alpha[/tex] Hence

The  decision rule is  

Fail to  reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

The cooling system changes the temperature of the water by 6 degrees

Answer:16

Step-by-step explanation:

265 / 10= 26.5 miles per gal.

424 miles / 26.5 mpg = 16 gallons

Answer:

[tex]-(y+6)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-y-6\\\\=-(y+6)[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] - y - 6[/tex]

Common factor : -1

[tex] - 1(y + 6) = \\ - (y + 6)[/tex]

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

the correct answer is b

Let us see how we can solve this step by step each :

6417 ÷ 31 , we divide 64 by 31 and get the resulting quotient as 2 .

Then we bring down 1 . So , the number below is 21 , which cannot be divided by 31 .

So , we will have to bring down 7 for which we have to add a 0 to the quotient . Then the quotient will become 20 as of now .

As 217 is divisible by 3 , I put seven near 21 , making the quotient as 217 and get the remainder 0 .

Hence in the correct solution the correct quotient = 207 .

But the same thing has not been done in Xavier's solution as he has put a 0 after 7 instead of putting it before 7 . Hence , Xavier's mistake is that he put the 0 after 7 instead of putting it before 7 .

In Xavier's solution the quotient is = 270

Therefore , Xavier's mistake is that he put the 0 after 7 instead of putting it before 7 .

Answer:

D. The flow rate of the large tank is -20 gal/min, and the flow rate of the small tank is 20 gal/min.

Step-by-step explanation:

Flow rate = [tex]\frac{gallons of water}{minute}[/tex]

flow rate of water in the big tank = [tex]\frac{300}{5}[/tex]

                         = 60 gallons/minute

flow rate in the smaller tank = [tex]\frac{200}{5}[/tex]

                          = 40 gallons/minute

The difference in flow rate between the tanks = 60 - 40

                          = 20 gallons/minute

Since the two tanks have the same amount of water after the given time, then the volume of water in the large tank decrease; while the volume of water in the small tank increased.

Therefore, the flow rate of the large tank is -20 gal/min, and the flow rate of the small tank is 20 gal/min. This shows that option D is correct.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

took the quiz

Answer:

5+3

Step-by-step explanation:

5+3

Answer:

5+3=8

Step-by-step explanation:

=$75.66 all in all and $67.99 dollars

Answer: 96%

1 square represent 1%

Answer:

96 present

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: c.)2 g/ml is the correct answer.

Answer: -1/9

Explanation: Perpendicular lines have negative reciprocal slopes.

A negative reciprocal slope is a fancy way of

saying flip the fraction and change the sign.

Notice that our slope is an integer.

We can turn it into a fraction by putting it over 1.

So we have 9/1.

A line perpendicular to this would be a negative reciprocal.

So flip the fraction, giving us 1/9, and change the sign to get -1/9.

Answer:

(a) An investigation of whether taking aspirin reduces one’s chance of having a heart attack.

Experimental

Neither blind nor double-blind (unless a placebo is being administered to some participants).

(b) An investigation of whether babies born into poor families (family income below $25,000) are more likely to weigh less than 5.5 pounds at birth than babies born into wealthy families (family income above $65,000).

Observational

There is no blinding issue here.

(c) An investigation of whether the size of the midsagittal plane of the anterior commissure (a part of the brain) of a man is related to the sexual orientation of the man.

Observational

There is no blinding issue here.

Step-by-step explanation:

An observational study happens where some variables are observed to determine their correlations.   On the other hand, in experimental studies, the researcher controls certain variables to determine causality.  Therefore, an experimental study provides evidence of cause and effect, like in (a) above.

Answer:

1. alterative exterior angles.

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't know what the rest of the other options are. So I can't answer the rest.

Answer:

Decision rule

Fail to reject the null  hypothesis

Conclusion

The sample evidence is not sufficient to conclude that more than three out of four financial institutions that offer online banking facilities are prone to fraud.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

  The sample size is  n =  214

   The sample proportion is p = 0.78

   The level of significance is [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally the population proportion is mathematically represented as

      [tex]p = \frac{3}{4} =0.75[/tex] (gotten from the statement  ''three out of four'' in the question)

The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : p = 0.75[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis [tex]H_a : p > 0.75[/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

     [tex]z = \frac{\^{p} - p}{ \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} } }[/tex]

=>    [tex]z = \frac{0.78- 0.75}{ \sqrt{\frac{ 0.75(1-0.75)}{214} } }[/tex]

=>  [tex]z = 1.01[/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

    [tex]p-value  = P(Z > z )[/tex]

=> [tex]p-value  = P(Z > 1.01 )[/tex]

From the z-table  

    [tex]P(Z > 1.01 ) = 0.15625[/tex]

So

    [tex]p-value  = 0.15625 [/tex]

From the obtained values we see that [tex]p-value > \alpha[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

 Therefore we can conclude that the sample evidence is  not  sufficient to conclude that more than three out of four financial institutions that offer online banking facilities are prone to fraud.