The null hypothesis should be rejected because the critical value is less than the calculated Value correct interpretation of the chi square analysis using a p value of 0.05
A chi-square test is defined as a statistically significant difference between the expected and observed frequencies.
The chi-square test uses hypothetical facts to determine significant differences between calculated and observed frequencies.
The null hypothesis is rejected because the squared value is less than the first found statistic or calculated value. Therefore the hypothesis is invalid.
To learn more about ‘null hypothesis’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28920252
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
A researcher observed that when two heterozygous plants with red flowers are crossed the resulting offspring include plants with red white or pink flower. The researcher proposes the null hypothesis that flower color is the result of independent assortment and incomplete dominance. The researcher calculates a chi square value of 7.3. Assuming two degrees of freedom which of the following is the correct interpretation of the chi square analysis using a p value of 0.05?
A transaction that lacks a bargained-for exchange lacks an element of consideration.
True
False
A transaction that lacks a negotiated exchange is devoid of consideration. True.
Consideration must meet the following conditions in order to form a valid contract: It has to be something worth negotiating for. It must benefit all contracting parties. The first is contract law, which defines a bargain as a voluntary agreement between two parties for consideration. Consideration can be money, goods, services, or a promise to do something in this context. For example, if someone agrees to clean a bedroom for $50, that is a good deal. An agreement between two parties must be a bargained-for exchange in order to constitute a contract. This occurs when each party provides a promise or performance (consideration) in exchange for a return promise.
Learn more about consideration here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019557
#SPJ4
What is a local law called?
Answer:
Local laws are called ordinances
A harh drought killed ome of the farm family’ corn and everal head of it cattle. Where on the production poibilitie curve could you poition a point to reflect thee circumtance?
A harsh drought killed some of the farm family’s corn and several head of it cattle. So, on the inside of the production possibilities curve you could poition a point in order to reflect these circumtances.
The production possibilities curve (PPC) is considered to be a graph which tends to show all of the different combinations of the output that can be produced when given the current resources and technology.
However, in order to reflect such circumtances, you could poition a point on the inside of the production poibilities curve. Thus, the slope of the production possibility curve is considered to be the marginal opportunity cost.Hence, the production possibility curve is concave to the origin.
To learn more about the production possibilities curve (PPC) here:
https://brainly.com/question/28289494
#SPJ4
In cases where informed decision makers such as trained medical staff or governmental officials agree that a research study has the potential to benefit a large number of people, written informed consent from participants is not needed.
The correct answer is False. Written informed permission from participants is not necessary when knowledgeable decision makers, such as skilled medical personnel or government authorities, concur that a research project has the potential to be helpful to many people.
A fundamental tenet of research ethics is informed consent. Its goal is to ensure that human participants can enter research freely (voluntarily), that they are fully informed of what it means to participate, and that they provide consent before entering the study.
Respect for people demands that subjects be given the option to decide what will or won't happen to them, to the extent that they are capable. When appropriate criteria for informed consent are met, this option is granted.
Read more about decision makers at
https://brainly.com/question/29035403
#SPJ4
On the question of whether american laws applied to the overseas territory acquired in the spanish-american war, the supreme court ruled in the insular cases that?
The supreme court ruled in the insula cases that the American Constitution and laws did not apply to US colonies on the issue of whether American laws applied to the foreign territory won in the Spanish-American War.
The United States Constitution established the country's national government, established its core laws, and provided its citizens with a number of essential rights. Delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia and Baltimore agreed on September 17, 1787, that the Bill of Rights solely applied to the federal government and not to any state governments. The Supreme Court continued to hold in United States v. Cruikshank (1876) that the First and Second Amendments did not extend to state governments even after the Fourteenth Amendment had been ratified.
Read more about supreme court at
https://brainly.com/question/8856072
#SPJ4
Can the U.S. citizenship be taken away?
Denaturalization is only possible in cases when a person obtained citizenship fraudulently or incorrectly when they were not qualified. To denaturalize a citizen, the federal government may file a civil or criminal case in federal court.
A citizen who loses their citizenship is not always forced to leave the United States. Instead, unless there are grounds for removal, they will return to their prior legal status in the United States. However, if they applied for family members to immigrate to the U.S. based on their citizenship, such family members may be deported unless they had a different reason for being in the country legally. This is due to the fact that denaturalization implies that the person never really possessed citizenship.
To know more about Denaturalization click on the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1578776
#SPJ4
What is Thoreau's main point in civil disobedience?
Thoreau's main point in Civil Disobedience was that one should be free to exercise his/her self conscience in the political sphere of his country.
Thoreau goes on to say that he/she and should not be a silent spectator to the wrong doings of the government and should boldly voice their resistance to it.
The basic premise of Thoreau In Civil Disobedience is that there exists a higher law than the civil law which demands the obedience of the individual.
He argues that both the government and the humans are subordinate.
Whenever one takes the inferior position and the other becomes subordinate, it is important that humans use their conscience whenever such a case arises. This would in turn lead to the well being of the society.
To know more about civil disobedience, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28342895
#SPJ4
Common Law is a term for the laws that are familiar to most of us.
True/False.
Common Law refers to the laws that most of us are familiar with. False.
Common Law is derived from custom or judicial decisions in English and American courts, but it is not the result of legislation. Higher court decisions are not binding on lower courts.
In law, common law (also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law) is the body of law created by judges and other quasi-judicial tribunals through written opinions.
The fact that common law emerges as precedent is what sets it apart. To synthesize the legal principles of previous cases, common law courts look to previous court decisions.The principle of stare decisis, which states that cases should be decided in accordance with consistent principled rules so that similar facts yield similar results, is at the heart of all common law systems.
Learn more about Common Law to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/13070537
#SPJ4
All budgetary changes have consequences.
Describe the impact of the three largest cuts you made. How would these cuts impact the economy and the president’s reelection chances?
Explain your answer in at least four complete sentences.
Answer:
Explanation:
I'm sorry, I cannot answer your question about the specific cuts you made as I do not have any information about what cuts you are referring to or their context. In general, cutting a budget can have a variety of different impacts depending on what the budget is for and the size of the cut.
For example, cutting the budget for a government program that provides assistance to low-income families could have a negative impact on those families and on the economy as a whole, as they may have less money to spend, which can lead to slower economic growth. Similarly, cutting the budget for infrastructure projects could also have a negative impact on the economy by slowing economic growth and leading to higher unemployment.
On the other hand, cutting the budget for a government program that is inefficient or duplicative could have a positive impact on the economy by freeing up resources that can be used more effectively elsewhere.
Regarding the impact on the president's reelection chances, the impact would depend on how the public perceive the budget cuts, their approval of the actions, and how those budget cuts are perceived to have affected the economy and their daily life. A strong economy tends to bode well for the reelection of a president, but if people begin to feel the negative effects of budget cuts and those cuts are perceived negatively by the public, it could impact the president's approval rating, and could decrease the chances of being reelected.
Which law passed by parliament led to a famous event where colonists dressed up as native americans and committed acts of vandalism and destruction?
a. Stamp Act
b. Sugar Act
c. Townshend Acts
d. Tea Act
Option d: Law passed by parliament led to a famous event where colonists dressed up as Native Americans and committed acts of vandalism and destruction is tea act.
In 1773 Parliament passed the Tea Act intended to help the financially struggling East India Company.
- a monopoly on all tea exported to the colony;
- export tax exemption; and
- Duty “refund” (refund) for certain excess tea in possession.
Tea sent to the colonies was to be transported only on East India Company ships and sold only through their own agents, bypassing independent colonial shippers and traders. .
This allowed the company to sell its tea in the United States or England at a lower price than usual. It could undermine someone else.
To learn more about 'Tea act', here:
https://brainly.com/question/5567830
#SPJ4
Who is affected by the Supreme Court decisions?
The Supreme Court's decisions have a huge impact on society as a whole, not just on federal and state courts, but also on schoolchildren in significant ways.
The Supreme Court has a significant impact on how to subordinate federal and state courts, as well as federal and state agencies, implement decisions made by the Court and how they are delayed, avoided, interpreted incorrectly, and overturned.
It includes responses from a variety of "populations," such as:
those who explain or elaborate on its decisions,those who are expected to carry them out or put them into practice, the people for whom the decisions are meant, and the general public.To learn more about Court, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
What is theory and laws?
A well-researched explanation of observations is a theory. A statement that encapsulates the relationship between variables is known as a scientific law.
Theories connect what observations tell us about astrophysical objects to what is known about those objects physically, whereas observations are used to support theories.
A scientific theory is a well-supported explanation for a feature of the natural world that is based on a collection of facts that have been repeatedly verified via observation and experiment. These hypotheses are not "guesses," but rather trustworthy depictions of the world as it is.
Read more about theory and laws at
https://brainly.com/question/30051243
#SPJ4
I Reciprocity a ueful tool to overcome problem that arie from relying on eaily-available information
The statement that Reciprocity is a useful tool to overcome problems that arise from relying on easily-available information is false.
Reciprocity is the fundamental aspect which is used to negotiate in tough situations. It is used to influence people and requires other features such as commitment, consistency and psychological approach as well. In social dilemma when people are not ready to cooperate, this technique helps in sorting the problems and coming to a conclusive point. The use of reciprocity involves healthy communication skills, dialogue and action, discussion and feedback and brain-storming or training. Thus a comprehensive approach enables the better negotiation capacity among the parties involved and they agree to mutual decisions and objectives.
Learn more about reciprocity at:
brainly.com/question/18575915
#SPJ4
The taxable amount of Jeff’s Social Security is $12,000.00
If the taxable amount of Jeff’s Social Security is $12,000.00, then the social security for the period is $ 744
How to find social security taxes ?Employers and employees are both subject to the Social Security tax, which is used to pay for the country's Social Security program. Payroll taxes are used to collect Social Security taxes, as required by the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA)
The retirement, disability, and survivorship benefits that the Social Security Administration provides to millions of Americans each year are paid for by Social Security taxes.
Some non-resident foreigners and members of religious organizations with particular ideologies are excluded from paying Social Security tax.
For social security taxes, the tax payers will pay 6.2 percent of of their wages or the portion of their wages that are taxable for social security which in this case is $ 12, 000 for Jeff.
The social security taxes to Jeff is therefore:
= 12, 000 x 6. 2%
= $ 744
Find out more on social security at https://brainly.com/question/13255138
#SPJ1
cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a:
Answer:
The Federal Court
Explanation:
What does Thoreau compare government to in civil disobedience?
Thoreau compare government to in civil disobedience to a machine.
Thoreau makes a comparison between the government to a machine to explain how governments is devoid of any humane or moral values. It dehumanizes individuals.
He further elaborates his point by stating that Thoreau claims that the machines are the 'mass of men'. On the other hand "with their bodies"; they "put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones."
By using this words that correspond to parts of different machines, he explains how the government exploits the people to fulfill his means is that by serving the state.
In this way, the government no longer fulfills its functions of a welfare state and does little for the betterment.
To know more about Civil disobedience, click here
https://brainly.com/question/28342895
#SPJ4
A crime considered so heinous that it is punishable by death referred to as:
a. Capital offense
b. Death penalty crime
c. Eye-for-an-eye offense
d. Felony crime.
You are a doctor in a small CityTwo weeks ago, the City was a legal marijuanamunicipality (For Medicinal Use only) but later decided not to participate in the legalized trade What is the legal ramification of your decision
An example of a recent bankruptcy is the bankruptcy case of rapper 50 Cent, which was filed in July 2015.
What is bankruptcy?
Bankruptcy is a legal process where an individual or a business struggling with financial difficulties can obtain relief from debt. It is a legal court process in which a debtor can be released from their financial obligations, such as outstanding loans and unpaid bills. Bankruptcy can also provide a fresh start for individuals and businesses, where they can begin rebuilding their financial life and establishing a better financial future.
According to court documents, 50 Cent had a networth of over $100 million at one point, but ended up filing for bankruptcy due to a combination of factors, including a series of costly lawsuits, bad investments, and a lavish lifestyle.
Had 50 Cent paid better attention to his finances, he may have been able to avoid bankruptcy. He could have been more selective in the investments he made and been more cautious with the lawsuits he was involved in. He also could have reigned in his spending and lived a simpler lifestyle.
To know more about that discussed this bankruptcy case can be found here:
https://brainly.com/question/27220195
#SPJ1
Which of the following is a necessary skill for effective legal analysis?
A Drafting an issue statement.
B Properly defining terms.
C Element identification.
D All choices.
Answer: D - All choices.
Explanation: Effective legal analysis involves several skills, including the ability to draft an issue statement, properly define terms, and identify the elements of a legal issue. All of these skills are important in order to thoroughly and accurately analyze a legal issue.
The duty of care that each of us must follow is to behave as a reasonable person. a. True b. False.
The correct answer is True. The standard of care that each of us must uphold is to act in a prudent manner.
People have a "duty of care" to behave toward others in a particular way and in accordance with predetermined criteria. The meaning of the phrase can vary based on the legal context in which it is employed. In order to understand what is morally right or wrong, just or unjust, ethics explores the intellectual justifications for our moral judgements. In a broader sense, ethics considers how people interact with one another and with nature, as well as their own freedom, responsibility, and sense of justice.
The degree of care, prudence, and judgement that a reasonable person would use in a specific situation is referred to as a standard of care. There are many variables that will affect the extent and character of a standard of care under tort law.
Read more about behave person at
https://brainly.com/question/28060988
#SPJ4
Duty-based ethical standards are based on religious precepts or derived through philosophical reasoning.
True / False
Duty-based ethical standards are based on religious precepts or derived through philosophical reasoning.True
Deontological (duty-based) ethics is concerned with what people do rather than the outcomes of their actions.
Make the correct decision.Perform the action because it is the right thing to do.Don't do anything wrong.They should be avoided because they are incorrect.This type of ethics does not allow you to justify an action by demonstrating that it had positive consequences, which is why it is also known as 'non-Consequentialist'.
The term 'deontological' is derived from the Greek word deon, which means 'duty'.
When people talk about 'the principle of the thing,' they usually mean duty-based ethics.
Learn more about ethical standards to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/28295890
#SPJ4
The United States taxes each barrel of imported oil at a flat rate. This is
a. an antidumping duty.
b. a dumping duty.
c. a quota.
d. a tariff.
What is the main point of the Supreme Court?
The main point of the Supreme Court is that, the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of the law.
The Supreme Court has been thus conferred with power in order to direct transfer which can be of any civil or criminal case from the one State High Court to the another State High Court or from a Court subordinate to the another State High Court.
However, the Supreme Court is said to be an apex of the Judiciary. As, it is the final arbiter of the law and as well as the highest authority to interpret and uphold the Constitution of the country. Hence, the Supreme Court is considered to be the guardian of our Constitution.
To learn more about the Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/28280833
#SPJ4
Briefly explain the principle of “PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENT” under criminal justice.
The principle of "presumption of innocent " is a fundamental principle of criminal justice that holds that an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. This principle is based on the idea that all individuals are entitled to the same rights and protections, regardless of whether they have been accused of a crime. It places the burden of proof on the prosecution, rather than on the accused, to demonstrate that the individual has committed the crime.
This principle is also known as the "innocent until proven guilty" principle. This principle is an essential aspect of the criminal justice system, as it ensures that individuals are not unjustly convicted or punished for crimes they did not commit. It also serves to protect the rights and freedoms of individuals who have been accused of a crime, as they are not immediately assumed guilty and are given the opportunity to defend themselves against the charges.
It also requires that the prosecution must provide evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to convince the court of the guilt.
To learn more about Presumption of Innocent,
https://brainly.com/question/22878354
https://brainly.com/question/29670183
Sociologist C. Wright Mills emphasized that social structure lies at the root of private troubles, and that what people may define as private troubles may be more accurately described as public issues, if these problems affect large number. What personal troubles have you encountered that may also be public issues?
Answer:
One personal trouble I have encountered that may also be a public issue is the increasing cost of healthcare. Even with health insurance, many people are struggling to pay for necessary medical treatments due to rising costs. This issue affects a large number of people, making it a public issue.
Explanation:
What were the results of Mendel's experiment ?
He proved that qualities are reliably passed on from parents to children in dominant and recessive patterns, regardless of other traits.
Although Gregor Mendel's rules serve as the theoretical foundation for our knowledge of the genetics of heredity, genetic analysis precedes Mendel.
Mendel contributed two new ideas to the field of genetics:
created clean lines
kept statistics notes and counted his findings
The gene for tall plants was dominant in Mendel's trials, whereas the allele for short plants was recessive. Similar to this, the dominant gene for yellow seeds outweighed the recessive allele for green seeds.
Mendel's second law was developed as a consequence of his second series of experiments. The law of independent assortment is this. It claims that the determinants of certain attributes are inherited separately from one another.
The law of segregation states that each gamete (egg or sperm cell) that an organism produces receives only one of the two gene copies that are present in the organism, and that the distribution of the gene copies is random.
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
All of the following are true of the federal tax advantages of a qualified plan EXCEPT: O At distribution, all amounts received by the employee are free of taxes. O Individually owned non-qualified annuities are generally taxed as follows: O Premiums are not deductible; interest credited to the cash value is taxed deferred.
Answer:
O At distribution, all amounts received by the employee are free of taxes.
What is the conclusion of Mendel's law of inheritance?
The conclusion Mendel reached was that plant traits are inherited independently, and no single trait influences other traits or traits.
Mendel proposed three laws of inheritance.
Law of Dominance - This law states that in the heterozygous state, the allele whose trait is transmitted through the other allele is known as the dominant allele, and the trait of the dominant allele is known as the dominant trait.
A character is a character that appears in the F1 generation.
Law of Segregation – This law states that when two traits are combined in a hybrid pair, the two characters do not mix and are independent of each other.
This means that during gametogenesis the two genes segregate completely independently of each other and the other trait segregates.
Law of Independent Sorting - The law of independent sorting states that different traits and traits have different genes, which influence each other and classify independently of other genes.
To know more about ‘Mendel laws’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29785146
#SPJ4
What is common law and how is it created ?
Common law is decided upon by judges based on how statute law is interpreted. An inferior court in the same jurisdiction must abide by the court's ruling.
A corpus of unwritten laws known as common law is founded on judicially established legal precedents. In unique situations where the conclusion cannot be predicted based on existing statutes or written principles of law, common law influences the decision-making process.
The British custom that was introduced to North America during the colonial eras of the 17th and 18th centuries gave rise to the American common-law system. Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, India, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom are other countries that use common law.
To learn more about common law, visit the link below:
brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ4
What are Mendel's 4 hypothesis?
The first of Mendel's four postulates and laws of inheritance is the principle of paired factors. The second is the principle of dominance. The third is the law of segregation or the law of purity of gametes, while the fourth is the law of independent assortment
Principles of Paired Factors: Postulate I
A character in an organism (diploid) is represented by at least two components. The two components are located at the same locus on the two homologous chromosomes. They might be a different or same representation of the same character. Alleles or allelomorphs are factors that indicate the same or alternate version of a character.
Postulate II. Dominance Principle:
The traits that occur in the hybrids of the F1 generation are always the dominant characters, and those that do not present in F1 progeny are always the recessive characters when two homozygous individuals with one or more sets of opposing characters are crossed.
Postulate III. Mendel's First Law of Inheritance, often known as the Law of Segregation or Law of Purity of Gametes:
When gametogenesis (the formation of gametes) or sporogenesis (the formation of spores), the two factors (alleles) of a trait that remain together in an individual, are randomly distributed to different gametes and then paired again in different offspring according to the probability principle, they maintain their identity and remain distinct. The law of segregation is sometimes referred to as the "law of purity of gametes" because two alleles remain together in their original, unaltered state without interacting, influencing, or combining.
Law of Independent Assortment (also known as Mendel's Second Law of Inheritance) Postulate IV:
Mendel considered two pairs of opposing characteristics and examined their inheritance after being pleased with monohybrid crossings (i.e., di-hybrid cross).
This law states that "the two components (genes) of each opposing character (trait) at the moment of gamete development assort or separate independently of the factors of other characters and become arbitrarily rearranged in the offspring."
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4