Answer:
False.
Explaination:
Based on the excerpt above, explain the link between economic and political freedoms.
Answer:
Explain how the response in part (A) affects or is affected by a political process, government entity, or citizen behavior as related to the scenario (0–1 point) (Disciplinary Practice 1.d) §Explain how the scenario relates to a political institution, behavior, or process in …
Explanation:
Based on the above quote, explain how the fear of failure is important to entrepreneurs and why finding a good team of people is a key focus of franchise owners.
Answer:
sometimes entrepreneurs don't put in their effort cause of failing. most people don't want to try their best inorder not to fail or get a bad record and this limit human knowledge and understanding of things and how to push forward
In a perfectly competitive market, the seller is the
Explanation:
There are a large number of buyers and sellers in a perfectly competitive market. The sellers are small firms, instead of large corporations capable of controlling prices through supply adjustments. They sell products with minimal differences in capabilities, features, and pricing. Brainliest pls
The decision in the Tinker case said that students do not have certain inalienable rights when they enter a school facility.
True
False
Answer:
false is the answer.
How does the bill of rights work to limit the powers of goverment?
A. It limits the powers of elected officials by defining term limits.
B. It ensures the separation of church and state.
C.it ensures individual rights to citizens.
Answer:
the answer is A
Explanation:
the reason I know this is because I learned about it
Isaiah wants to build a new shopping complex. He is afraid that once news gets out about his plans, the price of the land where he wants to build the shopping complex will increase in price. Isaiah, therefore, hires Landon to purchase the parcels of land for him and to keep the fact that Landon is working for Isaiah a secret. Landon enters into a written contract for the sale of the land with Miriam and does not tell Miriam that Landon is an agent for anyone else on the deal. Isaiah refuses to buy the property from Miriam.
Is Landon obligated to perform the contract with Miriam?
a. No, he is not because the purchase of the land benefits only the principal, Isaiah.
b. Yes, he is because agents are always liable for performance on contracts they enter into on behalf of their principal.
c. No, he is not because Landon is not the principal.
d. Yes, he is because there was an undisclosed principal who failed to perform.
Yes Landon is obligated to perform this contract with Miriam. The reason is because Yes, he is because there was an undisclosed principal who failed to perform.
The answer to this question is option d. An obligation can be described as a law that requires a person to do something.
Landon is obligated here because he has entered into a written agreement already with Miriam about the sale of this land. Meanwhile he has followed up with what Isaiah required of him by being silent on the owner.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/25353186?referrer=searchResults
Please help me to answer this
Answer:
Tomy is not reliable due to unforeseen circumstances.
Explanation:
Within police departments, there is a focus on the status of individuals as opposed to their behavior. Training officers [TOs] teach recruits what to look for in terms of potential danger, and officers tell each other stories about things they have seen that mark individuals as dangerous. This can be referred to as:
Group of answer choices
criminal motivation
criminal intent
police interaction
criminal blindness
Answer:
criminal intent
Explanation:
Indeterminate sanctions include community service, restitution, fines, boot camp, home confinement and _________________
Within police departments, there is a focus on the status of individuals as opposed to their behavior. Training officers [TOs] teach recruits what to look for in terms of potential danger, and officers tell each other stories about things they have seen that mark individuals as dangerous. This can be referred to as:
Group of answer choices
criminal motivation
criminal intent
police interaction
criminal blindness
Answer:
the answer is criminal motivationnnnnnn
Explanation:
use complete sentences. What do you think is the most serious crime affecting society? Why?
Answer:
Shootings and gun violence because the first reason being the most obvious is that it kills people and traumatizes families and the people that also had to witness the shooting. There have been over 50 deadly shootings and the police have had to obtain almost 300 guns. I also believe that the Columbine shooting has triggered all the other documented school shootings as well. Now kids have to do shooting drills and schools are cracking down on safety and security which leaves any child going to school having to worry if it’ll be the last time they say goodbye to their parents. It’s a terrible and evil crime that needs to end.
Explanation:
Which forensic scientist helped solve the St. Valentine's Day Massacre?
A. Alphonse Bertillon
OB.
Dr. Joseph Bell
Ос.
Calvin Goddard
D.
Francis Galton
O E.
Mathieu Orfila
Answer: Dr. Calvin Goddard
Explanation: Valentine's Day Massacre on February, 14, 1929, one of the nation's foremost forensic scientists, Dr. Calvin Goddard, was hired to examine the ballistic evidence. Goddard compared the bullets collected from the crime scene with test bullets fired by a range of firearms.
Describe four of the factors which may have been relevant to the public interest part of the Full Code test in Sally Challen’s case.
According to the Full Code Test, the four factors that were relevant to the public interest in the case of Sally Challen are as follows:
1. Seriosity of the Offence: Sally was found culpable in the murder of her abusive husband, Richard Sally. The murder shows a commitment of serious harm to Richard's life and endangered public safety if it remained unchecked. Sometimes, the abused becomes the abuser.
2. Culpability Level: Sally was adjudged culpable in the murder of Richard, having been directly involved in the act. She premeditated and planned the murder. But there was no history of any previous convictions in her case.
3. Circumstance and Harm: The circumstance in which Sally killed her husband was not considered in her conviction. Sally had suffered unabated abuses in the hands of her husband for many decades. According to her, the husband made her behave abnormally.
4. Societal Impact: The murder was bound to influence other women to give similar treatments to their abusive husbands if not checked by the court conviction. In the same way, the overturning of her earlier conviction from murder to manslaughter influenced victims of abusive husbands to seek redress. Every unlawful use of force against a person attracts public interest.
Interestingly, Sally Challen's conviction for murder was eventually commuted to manslaughter after her appeal, which determined that Richard Challen must have subjected Sally to coercive control.
According to Professor Evan Stark, coercive control involves the erosion of a person's self-esteem through constant humiliation, intimidation, punishment, and other abusive assertions of power. The aim of coercive control is to isolate the victim and make dependent on the perpetrator. A victim of coercive control is often deprived of basic needs while their daily routine is subject to total control.
Thus, according to the Full Code Test, after passing the evidential stage, prosecutors must subject the case to the public interest stage before determining whether or not to proceed with the prosecution.
Related question: https://brainly.com/question/25644506
What are your thoughts on the fact that defendants can engage in bargaining, more frequently initiated by the prosecutor?
Answer:
Some prosecutors also use plea bargains as a way to encourage defendants to testify against codefendants or other accused criminals. Plea bargains allow prosecutors to avoid trials, which are shunned because they are time-consuming, labour-intensive, and costly but carry no guarantee of success.
Explanation:
An example of innovative thinking is changing an old manufacturing process to save time and money.
True
False
Based on problem-solving strategy skills, it is true that an example of innovative thinking is changing an old manufacturing process to save time and money.
This is because innovation is a term used to describe the successful use of new ideas to create something better than the existing version.
Innovation usually involves establishing, improving, and executing a new commodity, process or service, to create efficiency, effectiveness, or competitive benefit.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "True."
Learn more about innovation here: https://brainly.com/question/19969274
Patricia Bell (63) shared a home all year with her son, Anthony (41), and Anthony's son, Damonte (20). Patricia and Anthony worked full-time. Damonte was a part-time student during the year; he took one class at the local community college. He had no income. No one else lived in the home. Patricia and Anthony each have earned income and an adjusted gross income of more than $20,000, but less than $30,000. Who is eligible to claim and receive the Earned Income Tax Credit?
Answer:
Explanation:
Ua
Anthony is eligible to claim and receive Earned Income Tax Credit.
To claim and receive Earned Income Tax Credit, the individual must meet the following criteria:
Have an income of less than 40,000 if not married.Have at least one child, student, aged between 19-24 years old.Living with this child in the same house.Have a job that can be partial or full time.As we can see from the question above, only Anthony fits all the requirements, he is the only one who can apply for and receive the Earned Income Tax Credit.
More information about tax credit:
https://brainly.com/question/2135349
35. David Fahey, a businessman in a medium-sized Ohio town, decides to run for city council. He has a
master's degree, is married, has three sons, and is a respected member of society. He fears he may lose the
upcoming city council election to a newcomer, Keith Joseph, who recently moved back to town after
establishing himself in South Carolina.
David hires his best friend, John, to call in a bomb threat on election day to a precinct where his rival, Keith
Joseph, is expected to garner majority support. This act is an example of
a. election fraud
a
The action of falsely calling a bomb threat on the election day to prevent the people to vote for personal reason is an example of election fraud.
Election fraud entails the following actions that includes:
election manipulationvoter fraud or riggingillegal interference with election process for personal purpose.The intention of David to call a false bomb threat on the election day to prevent people to vote for personal reason is an example of election fraud because it aims to reduced the vote garner by the opposition candidate.
Therefore, the Option A is correct because the act is an example of election fraud.
Read more about Election fraud:
brainly.com/question/24981124
A forensic specialist is called to a murder scene where a woman was shot while taking a bath they have been asked to collect firearm evidence the gun suspected of being used has fallen into the bathtub with the victim why should they not dry the gun before transporting it?
A. it could cause the gun to rust
B. it could cause the gun to fire
C. it could get rid of fingerprints on the gun
D. it could remove gun powder from the gun
Answer:
c
Explanation:
it could get rid of fingerprints on the gun
Answer: C
Explanation: It could remove fingerprints on the gun.
One country has a comparative advantage over another country in the production of a good if it.
A country has a comparative advantage over another country as regards production of goods when that country is able to produce the goods at lower cost.
What is comparative advantage?
In economic , comparative advantage can be regarded as an advantage that a country get over the other when that country can produce at lower cost.
In the law of demand and supply, it is established that consumer will definitely go for product with lower price.
Countries that usually specialize as regards comparative advantage usually have a gain from trade.We can conclude that at lower cost of production , a country will have comparative advantage.
Learn more about comparative advantage at;
https://brainly.com/question/14846093
Paul is the neighborhood Peeping Tom.At night he goes into Mary's backyard and peers through her bedroom window as she changes clothes.While Paul gains sexual gratification in watching Mary change clothes,he is also violating the ________ statute.
Answer: the statute depends upon the state you live in.
The President and Congress both have control over war powers
Answer:
Is this a True or false if so.. it's true??
Explanation:
How can citizens get a law passed without the state legislature's help?
Answer:
Below:-
Explanation:
Citizens can not passed a bill without the legislature's help!!! due to this sentence:-
"Ultimately, a law can only be passed if both the Senate and the House of Representatives introduce, debate, and vote on similar pieces of legislation."
Statistics on arson are limited in the sense that only fires classified as arson are reported to agencies like the FBI. True False
Answer:
This is true.
Agencies must classify arson as fires.I hope this helped at all.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
According to the Constitution's 1st Amendment:
a) secular activities cannot be regulated
b) criminal behavior that is deemed "religious in nature" is protected
c) Congress cannot create an official government sponsored religion
d) all of the above
D) All of the above
The first amendment enables everyone to practice or not practice religion, without an form of government intervention involved. Religiose beliefs are further protected under the Equality Act and several other laws. "Separation between Church and State," was built upon later in the 14th amendment as well.
I hope this helps! :)
According to Florida law if you knowingly fail to report a case of child abuse or neglect
Answer:
Third Degree Felony and punishable by up to five years in prison, five years of probation, and a $5,000 fine.
Explanation:
According to Florida law if you knowingly fail to report a case of child abuse or neglect of a child in Florida is considered a felony.
If the abuse or neglect does not cause any bodily damage or motive any disfigurement or incapacity, it is a third-degree felony and the consequences encompass as much as five years of probation or five years in prison, and a fine of up to $5,000.
What is the definition of a felony?
In US law, a felony is typically defined as a crime punishable by means of a term of imprisonment of no longer much less than one year or by the death penalty. Misdemeanors, in comparison, are frequently described as offenses punishable most effective through fines or via quick phrases of imprisonment in local jails.
Conclusion: The most serious crimes are labeled as felonies. A felony consists of crimes like homicide, terrorism, cocaine trafficking, and many others.
learn more about homicide here https://brainly.com/question/6228473
#SPJ2
hành vi hợp pháp là gì
why does your website suck because first of all I have failed multiple assignment because of this website never using it again
Answer:
you can't always rely on every stranger over the internet to help give you answers, look for trusted and newer sources from articles, reports, or other sources.
Explanation:
Which court decision protected students’ rights to free speech as early as 1969?
Earl
Tinker
Acton
What is the best way to achieve good governance? Elaborate your answer.
Governance is the process by which corporations establish their rules and policies and implement and monitor them. Good governance has a variety of important characteristics, and it can mean different things to different people.
ParticipationConsensus orientedAccountabilityTransparencyResponsiveEffective and efficientEquitable and inclusiveFollows the rule of lawStrategic visionSuppose a defendant is convicted at trial but believes that the judge made an error that impacted the decision. She would first ask her case be tried again at ________. If she were to lose at that court, she could still try again, if her argument were accepted, at the ________.
court of appeals; supreme court
The court of appeals determines whether or not the law was applied correctly, typically in cases where one is asked to have their cased tried again for a variety of reasons. In most cases, those who fail again and have their argument accepted will then be brought in front of the supreme court.
I hope this helps! :)
Initially, a defendant's case is at a trial court (Federal, State, Circuit Courts).
Then the case proceeds to the Court of Appeal before finally moving to the Supreme Court of the state or at the federal level.
But it is not true that all cases must move to the Supreme Court when the defendant appeals. The movement to the highest court requires the acceptance of the defendant's argument and the merit of each case.
Thus, the defendant's case can move from a trial court, an appeals court, and then to the supreme court.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/11640159