Answer:
Thomas Jefferson was the third president of the United States between 1801 and 1809. He was a politician who fervently defended expansion to the west, relying on the doctrine of Manifest Destiny, which urged the United States to expand towards the Pacific Ocean. Thus, during his government, he took several measures in this direction: the Louisiana Purchase, which doubled the territory of the United States, expanding it westward, and the Lewis and Clark expedition, which consolidated American sovereignty over these territories.
Precisely, the phrase of the question refers precisely to the Lewis and Clark Expedition, which occurred between 1804 and 1806, by means of which President Jefferson entrusted the explorers to find a river route from the East Coast to the Pacific.
What is the claim in this excerpt?
Answer:
Option C would be the correct choice.
Explanation:
Relatively poorly recognized have been the modern consumers who staged a defend throughout the Arab world. These same stories of them have been less appreciated. Mostly as a direct consequence, nearby news reporting has dropped. But nobody was curious to learn local news generates that concentrated mostly on widely known defend expects.The latter alternative options weren’t linked to the sort of situation in question. Therefore this response is the correct one.
Based on both passages, which element is absent from Passage 2 that would strengthen the author's discussion of the founding fathers' beliefs?
an analysis of the influence of political parties
a description of how checks and balances work
an explanation of why separating powers is important
an overview of the branches of the federal government
Answer:
A
Explanation:
An explanation of why separating powers is an important element is absent from Passage 2 that would strengthen the author's discussion of the founding fathers' beliefs.
What do you mean by Power?The authority, possession or control over anything is power.
The division of a state's government into branches, each with separate, independent powers and responsibilities, so that the powers of one branch do not conflict with those of the other branches, is referred to as the separation of powers.
The United States Federal Government is divided into three branches to ensure a separation of powers: legislative, executive, and judicial.
Therefore, Option (c) is correct.
Learn more about Power, here;
https://brainly.com/question/29575208
#SPJ6
He never looked at his father anymore nor his mother real about Peter in paragraph 148 in the story velvet
Jamaal wants to improve his chances of understanding certain content in his science class so that he can do well on an upcoming test. To monitor his understanding of the material, he decides to write down everything that he already knows about the content that will be tested. He also puts into place a plan to address his weaknesses in his understanding of certain scientific concepts.
What is most likely to happen as a result of Jamaal following these steps?
A. He will increase his understanding of content in other subject areas.
B. He will see an improvement on his test score for the upcoming science test.
C. His teacher will allow him to retake his test if he does poorly.
D. He will receive a lecture from his teacher for performing poorly on his science tests.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I took the assignment on Ed
Answer:
B
Explanation:
12
Select the correct answer.
Which of the following characterizes the structure of the passage as a whole?
A.
a written request
ОВ. a reasoned argument
c. a descriptive essay
D. a personal narrative
from Message Regarding Labor
Legislation (March 25, 1908)
by Theodore Roosevelt
I call your attention to certain measures as to which
think there should be action by the Congress before the
close of the present session. There is ample time for
their consideration. As regards most if not all of the
matters, bills have been introduced into one or the other
of the two Houses, and it is not too much to hope that
action will be taken one way or the other on these bills at
the present session. In my message at the opening of the
present session, and, indeed, in various messages to
previous Congresses, I have repeatedly suggested action
on most of these measures.
Child labor should be prohibited throughout the
Nation. At least a model child-labor bill should be passed
for the District of Columbia. It is unfortunate that in the
one place solely dependent upon Congress for its
legislation there should be no law whatever to protect
children by forbidding or regulating their labor.
I renew my recommendation for the immediate
reenactment of an employers' liability law, drawn to
conform to the recent decision of the Supreme Court.
Within the limits indicated by the court, the law should
be made through and comprehensive, and the
Reset
Next
Answer: the answer is a reasoned argument
Explanation: i just took the test on Plato and it was correct!
Answer:
b
Explanation:
You have read four Orations in which Margaret Cavendish, duchess of Newcastle, puts various views into the mouths of four different fictitious women. What do you think were Cavendish’s own beliefs and assumptions about women? On what do you base your inference? Finally, how clearly and effectively do you think Cavendish’s own views come through in the Orations?
Answer:
Given that none of the four voices can be attributed to Cavendish herself, the obvious inference is that Cavendish held views and possessed abilities that enabled her to eloquently express all of these divergent views. She was aware of widely ranging positions, and she was herself an educated woman. Therefore, it is hard to believe that she would hold the views of Speaker III, for example, who disparages women. Most clearly, perhaps, the orations show that Cavendish values wide, open discourse. In that sense she seems to agree with Speaker I. The act of putting these orations together, in itself, implies that Cavendish must have believed in the value of female perceptions and of women taking active intellectual roles. The fact that all the orations are so skillfully presented is a clear and convincing demonstration that such values are valid.
Pedro gathers his younger brothers and told them it is time to go home.
How can you edit this sentence so that there is no shift in verb tense?
Change "it is" to "it was"
Change "gathers" to gathered"
Change "told" to "tells"
All of the above
Answer:
Change "told" to "tells"?
Change "told" to, "tells" can you edit this sentence so that there is no shift in verb tense.
What is a sentence?A sentence is a verbal expression in linguistics and grammar, as in the English example "The swift brown fox jumps over the slow dog." It is often described in conventional grammar as a group of words that conveys a full notion or as a unit made up of a subject and predicate.
A sentence fragment is a set of words that appears to be a complete sentence but isn't. Typically, sentence fragments lack a subject or verb or do not fully articulate a notion. A clear illustration of a sentence fragment is given below owing to the rain.
You have generated an incorrect shift when you begin a sentence in one tense (past, present, or future) but then flip to another tense. Although she is a gifted athlete, she lacked good manners. This phrase starts out in the present tense before switching to the past tense.
Therefore, Thus option (C) is correct.
Learn more about sentence here:
https://brainly.com/question/18728726
#SPJ2
Negative thoughts/feelings
Answer:
Hello Queen Messy here!
. Lonely
. Getting bullied
. having no friends
. no one cares about you.
and more (:
Explanation:
Answer:
Negative thoughts?
Explanation:
I'm scared that ill fail the 6th grade
im a nobody
I dont like my self
My sisters make me not want to have kids
I really just dont like myself
Stuff like that is negative.
what characteristic do the poems "Will there be a 'Morning?" and "I dwell in Possibility" share?
The law requires that everyone..........his car Checked at least once a year
Answer:
The law requires that everyone have his car checked at least once a year.
Explanation:
Need need need help!!
Answer:
17. A
18. A.
19. C.
Explanation:
(correct me if I'm wrong)
hearing a loud noice we ran to the window
Answer:
is this a question? what is the question you need to do?
Who is Sal and how has he helped Jeremy so far in the dream bender
Answer:
ccccccccc
Explanation:
Which of the following is a denotation of interesting?
O A. Emotions of excitement
B. Overwhelming feeling
O C. Holding one's attention or provoking interest
O D. Memories of science class experiments
Answer:
c
Explanation:
it makes the most sense
is this sentence properly transcribed?, its raining today, so unless you wanna get drenched, you're gonna need your umbrella.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
How does the structure of the story create suspense
Use this formula to calculate this word problem. d= r*t
Robert is going on a trip to see his mother for her birthday party that evening, and is considering taking the train. His
mother lives 500 miles away, and he needs to work most of the day before he leaves. The train travels about 180 miles
per hour. How long will it take him to travel? If he leaves at 2PM, will he have enough time to get to the party at 8PM?
a 18.8 hours, yes
c. 2.8 hours, yes
b. 90 minutes, yes
none of the above
d.
Answer: c. 2.8 hours, yes
Explanation:
Robert needs to travel 500 miles at a rate of 180 miles per hour. That means that we need to find how many hours that would take.
Then:
500 = 180*x
x is the number of hours that he needs for the journey
Then:
500/180 = x hours
500/180: 2.8 hours
Considering that it takes less than three hours to get to his mother´s birthday, if Robert leaves at 2 pm he will arrive around 5 pm, with plenty of time to get to the party at 8 pm.
Answer:
that person was right
Explanation:
what is a logical fallacy you encounter in real life? quote the comment involving the logical fallacy, identify its source and then explain what sort of logical fallacy it is and why.
Answer:
during a debate round(the topic being debated was a federal job guarantee, and i was debating against it), part of my evidence was about politicians using the job guarantee system to push their political agendas, and i gave the example of trump and his wall (specifically that a job guarantee would allow him to hire people to build it, and they wouldn't have much choice other than unemployment). this was important because my point was basically that politics shouldn't be where the do not need to be. my opponent said "would you agree that some things that politicians do or want to do are good? for example, bernie sanders wanting to raise the minimum wage?" (I said yes because in my opinion the min. wage should be higher) then he said "so that strikes down your contention because you agreed that certain political agendas are good and beneficial"(not the exact words but this was several weeks ago so i can't remember it word for word)
i can't remember the name of the type of logical fallacy, but will describe it. He misinterpreted/twisted my point and what i was saying. I clarified with him that although i did agree with his question, that was only my opinion and my views, and that there are many people who would disagree with me on that matter. i then told him that my point was that politics should not be where they don't belong, which in this case was the lives and jobs of people (obviously not politicians in this case) and that a jobs guarantee would cause exactly that to happen. he still said later that because i agreed that some political agendas are good, my point did not stand.
Basically, he sort of twisted what i was saying, and made a false claim based on that.
***(for slight background i do lincoln-douglas style debate. there is also public forum style, and policy style debate.) also in this same debate round, i asked him a question (i asked if he knew if people in the jobs guarantee program would be able to choose their job) and he responds "ThIs is NoT a PoLiCy DeBaTe, So I dOn'T tHinK tHaT qUeSTioN is ReLeVAnT" (in my head i had a response but i didn't think the words 'no duh' would get me anywhere). First of all, he had no reason to say that because all it did was waste my time. Second, that was completely irrelevant to anything were talking about. Third, it did not answer my question. (also it seemed a little bit rude or almost passive-aggressive in a way) I'm pretty sure this was like a red-herring type thing
Drag each tile to the correct box. Read the excerpt from Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Dr. Heidegger's Experiment," and then match the characters with the traits they represent. Colonel Killigrew lust Mr. Medbourne pompousness Widow Wycherly vanity Mr. Gascoigne greed arrowBoth arrowBoth arrowBoth arrowBoth Reset Next
Answer:
Mr. Gascoigne = Pompousness
Widow Wycherly = Vanity
Mr. Medbourne = Greed
Colonel Killgrew = Lust
Explanation:
Answer:
i took the test.
Explanation:
what are your abservation during a swimming competation?
Answer:
dont look at the other swimmers just swim as fast as you can
Can you help me with these questions please?
Answer:
1. We
2. He
3. They
4. She
5. They
6. She
7. It
8. It
9. They
10. We
Hope that helps.
Answer:
1 we
2 he
3 they
4 she
5 they
6 She
7 it
8 it
9 they
10 we
pls give brainly :)
Explanation:
PLEASE HURRY WILL MARK BRAINLIEST Read the excerpt from The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street.
WOMAN ONE
(a little reluctantly)
Well . . . sometimes I go to bed late at night. A couple of times . . . a couple of times I'd come out on the porch and I'd see Mr. Goodman here in the wee hours of the morning standing out in front of his house . . . looking up at the sky.
(she looks around the circle of faces.)
That's right looking up at the sky as if . . . as if he were waiting for something.
(a pause)
As if he were looking for something.
There's a murmur of reaction from the crowd again.
How does Woman One’s claim about Les Goodman affect other elements in the story?
The neighbors become more sympathetic toward Les Goodman.
The neighbors become even more suspicious of Les Goodman.
The neighbors become less frightened of Les Goodman.
The neighbors become more protective of Les Goodman.
Answer:
The neighbors become even more suspicious of Les Goodman
Explanation:
I hope I'm right
Which statement best describes the narrative point of
view in this passage?
It is impossible to say how first the idea entered my
brain; but once conceived, it haunted me day and night.
Object there was none. Passion there was none. I loved
the old man. He had never wronged mne. He had never
given me insult. For his gold I had no desire. I think it
was his eyel yes, it was this! He had the eye of a vulture
a pale blue eye, with a film over it. Whenever it fell upon
me, my blood ran cold; and so by degrees-very gradually
-I made up my mind to take the life of the old man, and
thus rid myself of the eye forever.
The passage uses a third-person point of view and
a reliable, all-knowing narrator.
reliable, all-knowing narrato.
an unreliable narrator.
OThe passage uses a first-person point of view and a
OThe passage uses a third-person point of view and
-"The Tell-Tale Heart,"
Edgar Allan Poe
The passage uses a first-person point of view and
an unreliable narrator.
Answer:
(D)The passage uses a first-person point of view and an unreliable narrator.
Explanation:
Every two hours the nurse told him to take a pill
Answer: what’s the question?
Explanation:
Write one sentence on why it is important to not plagiarize.
Answer:
It’s stealing and lying. Stealing and lying are wrong, remember? Stealing someone else’s words and putting your own name on these words is wrong.
Explanation:
Why does Jing-Mei feel like she doesn’t know her mother?
Answer:
Jing-Mei's mother feels she is doing everything possible to provide opportunities for her daughter. When Jing-Mei through a temper tantrum about the piano lessons, it upset her mother. Her mother felt that her daughter did not appreciate what she was trying to do for her.
Explanation:
What is the purpose of a persuasive letter?
O to demonstrate the steps in a process
O to inform readers about meaningful research
O to convince readers to take action or support a cause
O to explain a societal problem that needs to be addressed
PLEASE HELP TIMED TEST !!!!
Answer:
O to convince readers to take action or support a cause
Explanation:
To persuade means to convince
We can see that the purpose of a persuasive letter is: To convince readers to take action or support a cause.
What is persuasive letter?Persuasive letter actually refers to the type of letter that is written with the aim to persuade.
In other words, persuasive letter is written to make people take an action for something.
Learn more about persuasive letter on https://brainly.com/question/878835
#SPJ5
It's common for eyewitnesses to
a report contradictory versions of the events that they saw.
b Remember minute details perfectly for many years after the event
c come to news bloggers to help make sense of what they sem
d form the same opinion as each other about what they ve
witnessed
What are the different settings that Gilbert is thinking of
Answer:
Explanation:
whta be more specific
2 minutes speech about money
Answer:
Money is the root of all evil.
Money makes you secure and happy.Still, “money answers every need.” (Ecclesiastes 10:19) For example, money can buy the things you need to survive—such as food and medicine.How can you use money wisely?
It is wise to use money responsibly and honestly.
Explanation:
Answer:
Money is the most important aspect of our lives. Everybody wants to lead a prosperous life, although it is true that money cannot buy all the happiness. But money is the reason behind the cause of happiness. It can get us to buy all the natural products and services like flats, bungalows, cars, gold, diamonds, etc.
Thus, it can be said that money can be earned by those who know how to value it. It might not be everything one wants to own, but it is a thing that one must own to survive.