Answer:
To calculate how much more energy a magnitude-9 earthquake releases compared to that of a magnitude-7 earthquake, you can use the formula:
Energy (magnitude 9) = Energy (magnitude 7) * (10^(3/2))^(9-7)
Plugging in the values, you get:
Energy (magnitude 9) = Energy (magnitude 7) * (10^(3/2))^(9-7)
= Energy (magnitude 7) * (10^(3/2))^2
= Energy (magnitude 7) * 10^3
= Energy (magnitude 7) * 1000
This means that a magnitude-9 earthquake releases 1000 times more energy than a magnitude-7 earthquake.
summarize how solid ground can take on the properties of a liquid
Answer:
Liquids can expand more comparative to solid under the influence of thermal expansion. They are slightly more compressible. Under suitable conditions and temperature, the state of the solid can be changed into a liquid.
Explanation:
Which rhetorical appeal does Wiesel rely on in paragraph four? Overall, what is his argument regarding the past and the future?
Passage: “Home, Despair, and Memory” By Elie Wiesel
Wiesel establishes paragraph his authority with the audience by making use of the ethos appeal throughout his discourse. For instance, in the speech's opening.
What distinguishes the present from the past and the future?When the action took place determines which of these three tenses is used. Verbs in the past, present, and future tenses describe events that have already happened, are happening now, and are yet to happen.
Why is the past significant for the present?We can learn from the errors made by others in the past by studying history. It aids in our understanding of the various causes of human behavior. As a result, it aids in making us more objective when making decisions.
To know more about paragraph visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/73016
#SPJ1
A) Briefly explain one major difference between Wineapple's and Brinkley's historical interpretation of Manifest Destiney.
B) Briefly explain how one historical event or development in the period 1848 to 1861 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Wineapple's interpretation.
C) Briefly explain how one historical event or development in the period 1848 to 1861 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Brinkley's interpretation
(A) One major difference between Wineapple's and Brinkley's historical interpretations is that both authors believe that Manifest Destiny played a different role in the Civil War.
What is Manifest Destiny?Manifest destiny was a cultural belief in the nineteenth-century United States that American settlers were fated to spread across North America.
The concept had three fundamental tenets:
The unique virtues of the American people and their institutionsThe mission of the United States to redeem and recreate the West in the image of the agrarian EastAn unstoppable destiny to complete this vital dutyB) Bleeding Kansas is a historical event from 1848 to 1861 that is not directly mentioned in the excerpts but could be used to support Wineapple's interpretation.
C) The Compromise of 1850 is a historical event from 1848 to 1861 that is not directly mentioned in the excerpts, could be used to support Brinkley's interpretation. The Compromise of 1850 was drafted in response to California's admission as a free state.
Learn more about Manifest destiny
https://brainly.com/question/11669373
#SPJ4
What was the range of annual wages for each laborer at Huancavelica?
sedaris uses both understatement and hyperbole in this essay. Identify two examples of each and explain the effect
"The size of tombstones" is a hyperbole. The author employs hyperbole to describe how many teeth Anna has. The character is eager to communicate, thus it is obvious that she does not have teeth that are as large as tombstones.
Through the use of hyperbole, Sedaris shapes the impact of wit. Additionally, it creates a better description of the scene so that the reader can visualize it better.
What is the major goal of David Sedaris' novel Us and Them?In his essay "Us and Them," David Sedaris describes a society where people are sheltered, greedy, and only watch television for information. After reading the essay, I got the impression that the narrative included elements of the book Fahrenheit 451, in which people watch television in place of telescreens and big brother.
To know more about Sedaris' novel visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/16182379
#SPJ1
calculate how much more energy a magnitude-9 earthquake releases compared to that of a magnitude-7 earthquake
Answer:
16.1 earthquake
Explanation:
hope it helps
A business journal reports that the probability that Internet users in the United States will use a mobile payment app is 0. 60. The journal claims this indicates that out of 5 randomly selected Internet users, 3 will use the mobile payment app. Is this business journal interpreting the probability correctly?
Answer:
Explanation:
No, the business journal is not interpreting the probability correctly.
The probability of an event occurring is a value between 0 and 1, where 0 represents an impossible event and 1 represents a certain event. In this case, the business journal is reporting that the probability of an Internet user in the United States using a mobile payment app is 0.60, which means that there is a 60% chance that a randomly selected Internet user will use the mobile payment app.
However, when the journal claims that out of 5 randomly selected Internet users, 3 will use the mobile payment app, they are interpreting the probability as a number of successes in a certain number of trials. The probability of 0.60 cannot be directly converted into the number of expected successes in a fixed number of trials without additional information.
In order to calculate the expected number of Internet users out of 5 who will use the mobile payment app, you would use the formula for expected value of a binomial distribution, which is n * p, where n is the number of trials and p is the probability of success. In this case, n is 5 and p is 0.60. So, expected value of number of internet users out of 5 using the app is 5 * 0.60 = 3 which is what the journal is claiming.
Therefore, The journal's interpretation of probability is in the right direction but is not a directly convertable quantity.