Close the following accounts for the period: Revenue $1,000 Expenses $800 1 IBO $500 WBO $100

One non-profit organization that would benefit from an innovative strategy is the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). WWF is a worldwide organization dedicated to preserving and protecting the natural world.

One unique way to operationalize a new idea for WWF would be to implement a virtual reality experience. This experience could allow users to explore different parts of the world and witness endangered species in their natural habitats. This would serve as a powerful tool to raise awareness and educate individuals on the importance of conservation efforts.

Another idea would be to partner with local businesses to promote sustainability practices and products. This could be achieved through a certification system, where eco-friendly businesses could be recognized for their efforts and contributions to environmental conservation. This would not only promote sustainable practices but also help local businesses gain recognition for their efforts.

Overall, WWF is an organization that has made strides in environmental conservation efforts but operationalizing virtual reality experiences and promoting sustainable business practices could lead to new avenues of impact and education.

for more such questions on organization

https://brainly.com/question/25922351

#SPJ11

Product differentiation is a strategy used by firms to differentiate their products from those of their competitors in order to gain a competitive edge.

The aim is to make the products more appealing to consumers by highlighting their unique features. Firms might set prices above marginal cost because of product differentiation, even though they are competing by setting prices. Product differentiation is a strategy used by firms to differentiate their products from those of their competitors in order to gain a competitive edge.

The aim is to make the products more appealing to consumers by highlighting their unique features. Firms might set prices above marginal cost because of product differentiation, even though they are competing by setting prices. In a monopolistic competition model, each firm has its own unique product. As a result, they have some pricing power and can charge prices above marginal cost.

To know more about marginal cost please refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30165613

#SPJ11

Among the given options, the statement that is the most accurate is:

B) Firms that have a low-cost position can reduce the threat of rivalry in an industry.

A cost-leadership strategy is a business-level strategy in which a firm tries to become the lowest-cost producer in the industry, in terms of the costs of manufacturing, production, and distribution, for a given level of quality, features, and functions of the product or service. This approach is based on the assumption that, by reducing the costs of its products or services, the firm can increase its sales volume, market share, and profits.

Firms with a low-cost position reduce the threat of rivalry in the industry because they are better able to compete on price than their rivals. This is because they can offer lower prices to their customers without compromising on quality. This puts pressure on their competitors to match their prices, which reduces the threat of rivalry in the industry. As a result, the firm can increase its market share and profits while maintaining its low-cost position.

A cost-leadership strategy can actually increase the barriers to entry for new firms because it requires a significant investment in manufacturing, production, and distribution infrastructure that new entrants may not be able to match.

Cost leaders tend to be especially vulnerable to substitute products, is not true. Cost leaders may be less vulnerable to substitute products because their lower prices can attract customers away from higher-priced substitutes.

Cost leaders tend to be especially vulnerable to the threat of suppliers is not rue as well. Cost leaders may actually be less vulnerable to the threat of suppliers because their lower costs give them greater bargaining power with suppliers.

To know more about cost-leadership strategy, visit the link : https://brainly.com/question/14395542

#SPJ11

Inflation has negatively impacted the purchasing power of the bond issued by Archer Corporation. Both the interest payments received over the years and the principal amount repaid at maturity would have reduced purchasing power due to the erosion of the value of money caused by inflation.

Eighteen years ago, the Archer Corporation borrowed a significant amount of money by issuing bonds. Bonds are debt instruments that pay interest over a specific period and return the principal amount at maturity. The purchasing power of these bonds has been affected by inflation over time.

Inflation erodes the value of money over time, reducing its purchasing power. As a result, the future value of a fixed amount of money decreases, meaning that the same amount of money can buy fewer goods and services in the future.

The effect of inflation on the purchasing power of the bond issued by Archer Corporation is twofold. First, the interest payments made by Archer Corporation over the years would have been fixed amounts, as determined at the time of the bond issuance.

However, due to inflation, the real value of these interest payments would have decreased. Therefore, the purchasing power of the interest income received from the bond would have diminished over time.

Second, at the bond's maturity, Archer Corporation would have repaid the principal amount. However, due to inflation, the real value of the principal amount repaid would have been lower than the original borrowed amount. This means that the purchasing power of the principal repayment would have been reduced.

To learn more about Inflation

https://brainly.com/question/777738

#SPJ11

Answer:

Someone Who does that gets. paid differently depending on their Job Type

Explanation:

Answer: How to Obtain a Check Register. If you didn’t receive a check register with your checkbooks and would like one, you have several options: Use a template such as a free Go_ogle Docs check register. Order a new register from an online check printer or your bank. Grab a check register from the back of an old checkbook or anywhere you can find one.

The value of Sora's stock based on the given information is $2,651.02.

The number of outstanding shares of Sora Industries is 64 million and the value is $123.Sora's weighted average cost of capital is 11%.The company's revenue and free cash flow are expected to grow at a rate of 4.5% beyond year four.To calculate the value of Sora's stock based on the above information, we can use the Gordon Growth Model which is as follows:Gordon Growth Model:  Po = D1/ (ke - g)where, Po = Current Stock priceD1 = Dividend per share next yearke = Cost of equityg = Growth rate in dividends per shareD1 = Dividend in year oneD0 = Dividend in the current yearTo get the value of D1, we can use the Dividend Growth Model which is as follows:D1 = D0 (1 + g)where, D0 = Dividend per share todayg = Growth rateTherefore,D1 = 123(1+4.5%) = 128.18Using the above values in the Gordon Growth Model we get,Po = D1/ (ke - g)Po = 128.18/ (11% - 4.5%) = $2,651.02Therefore, the value of Sora's stock based on the given information is $2,651.02.

Learn more about stock here:

https://brainly.com/question/31940696

#SPJ11

To earn a profit of $17,287.19 with an initial deposit of $10,096.25 at an interest rate of 8% compounded, you would need to invest the money for approximately 7 years.

To calculate the time needed to earn a specific profit, we can use the compound interest formula: A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where A is the final amount, P is the principal (initial deposit), r is the interest rate, n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the time in years.

In this case, the principal is $10,096.25, the interest rate is 8% (0.08), and the desired profit is $17,287.19. We need to solve for t.

$10,096.25 * (1 + 0.08/n)^(n*t) = $10,096.25 + $17,287.19

Simplifying the equation and solving for t, we find that t is approximately 7 years.

To earn a profit of $17,287.19 with an initial deposit of $10,096.25 at an interest rate of 8% compounded, you should invest the money for approximately 7 years.

To know more about profit , visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29662354

#SPJ11

The tools that Caleb King can use to evaluate the company are a) horizontal analysis, vertical analysis, and ratio analysis.

These tools help to determine the company's financial performance and provide detailed information on the financial statements. Horizontal analysis is a financial statement analysis method that compares historical financial data over a specific period to evaluate changes in financial performance. This analysis method compares the financial data from the income statement and balance sheet of a company from two or more periods.

The purpose of horizontal analysis is to help identify trends, such as changes in revenue, expenses, or net income, that may indicate the direction of a company's performance.Vertical analysis is a financial statement analysis method that compares financial statement line items to a common base, such as sales or total assets. This analysis method is used to determine the proportion of each line item in relation to the base. So the answer is a) horizontal analysis, vertical analysis, and ratio analysis.

Learn more about Caleb King: https://brainly.com/question/32244251

#SPJ11

a. Calculation of the number of units started and completed this period for the Forming department Units Started = 19,000 Units Completed = 16,000

b. Calculation of the equivalent units of production for both direct materials and conversion for the Forming department Direct materials Conversion Equivalent units of production = Units Completed + (Units in ending work in process inventory × Percentage of completion)Equivalent units of production = Units Completed + (Units in ending work in process inventory × Percentage of completion)Equivalent units of production = 16,000 + (2,000 × 90%)

Equivalent units of production = 16,000 + 1,800 Equivalent units of production = 17,800c. Calculation of the costs per equivalent unit of production for both direct materials and conversion for the Forming department Costs per Equivalent unit of production Direct materials Conversion Total Costs Costs in Beginning work in process inventory$17,000$9,000 Costs incurred during current period$88,000$30,000$118,000

Total costs to be accounted for$105,000$39,000$144,000.Costs per equivalent unit of production:Direct materials = Costs to be accounted for / Equivalent units of production Direct materials = $105,000 / 17,800 Direct materials = $5.90 per equivalent unit.Conversion = Costs to be accounted for / Equivalent units of production Conversion = $39,000 / 17,800 Conversion = $2.19 per equivalent unit

For more question on production

https://brainly.com/question/7924898

#SPJ11

When the marginal propensity to import and marginal propensity to save are smaller, the flatter will be the ZZ line and a given change in government spending (G) will have a smaller effect on domestic output.What is the ZZ line?The ZZ line shows equilibrium GDP when changes in spending are equal to changes in output. It is a 45-degree line on the income-expenditure graph. The income-expenditure graph is a graph that shows the relationship between GDP (output) and aggregate expenditures in the economy. When the marginal propensity to import and marginal propensity to save are small, a given change in government spending (G) will have a smaller effect on domestic output because of the flatter ZZ line. If there is a rise in government spending (G), aggregate demand (AD) will rise, which will cause a shift in the aggregate demand curve. However, because of the smaller marginal propensity to save and the smaller marginal propensity to import, the rise in AD will not translate into as significant an increase in output as if the marginal propensity to save and import were higher. As a result, a given change in government spending (G) will have a smaller effect on domestic output.

The journal entry for ABC Corp issued 4-year, 7% bonds with $2,000,000 as par value on December 31, 2020, received $2,240,000 in cash is given below: Journal entry: Cash account: Debit $2,240,000Bonds payable account: Credit $2,000,000Premium on bonds payable account: Credit $240,000 (Calculation: $240,000 = $2,240,000 - $2,000,000).

Here, the corporation has issued bonds of $2,000,000. However, the company has received $2,240,000 in cash, which implies that investors paid more than the par value of the bond. This difference between the par value of the bond and the price paid by investors is referred to as a premium.

The corporation will pay the bond interest semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 every year. The premium on bonds payable is an asset account. It will be amortized over the bond's life, and a certain amount of premium will be deducted from the bond's interest expense at each payment date.

To know more about Corp issued refer here : brainly.com/question/30354169

#SPJ11

Answer: The price elasticity of demand for each group to two decimal places is -0.54 for the general public and -1.28 for students.

Given that Qgp = 500 - 5PQs = 200 - 4PP = R35We can use the formula for price elasticity of demand to calculate the price elasticity of demand for each group, which is given as: PED = (% Change in Quantity Demanded) / (% Change in Price).

PED for the general public Qgp = 500 - 5PQgp = 500 - 5(35)Qgp = 325PED gp = [(Q2 - Q1) / Q1] / [(P2 - P1) / P1]. Where,Q1 = 325Q2 = 300P1 = R35P2 = R40PEDgp = [(300 - 325) / 325] / [(40 - 35) / 35]PEDgp = -0.54PED for students Qs = 200 - 4PQs = 200 - 4(35)Qs = 60PEDs = [(Q2 - Q1) / Q1] / [(P2 - P1) / P1]Where,Q1 = 60Q2 = 75P1 = R35P2 = R40PEDs = [(75 - 60) / 60] / [(40 - 35) / 35]PEDs = -1.28.

Therefore, the price elasticity of demand for each group to two decimal places is:-0.54 for the general public-1.28 for students.

To know more about price elasticity visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30161342

#SPJ11

The money leftover for each beer brand, given a total of $5, is as follows:

(a) To calculate the money leftover when purchasing each brand of beer, we subtract the price of the beer from the total amount of money consumers have. Assuming consumers have $5, we can calculate the money leftover for each brand:

For Brand A: $5 - $1.90 = $3.10

For Brand B: $5 - $2.80 = $2.20

For Brand C: $5 - $3.10 = $1.90

For Brand D: $5 - $1.80 = $3.20

For Brand E: $5 - $4.00 = $1.00

Now, let's plot these points on the graph, with the x-axis representing money leftover and the y-axis representing quality:

Quality (y)

 |

88|    E

77|      C

78|      B

63|     A

38|      D

 |

--------------------------------

      Money Leftover (x)

(b) If the pub offers Brand A, Brand B, and Brand C, we would expect a higher fraction of people to choose Brand A compared to when only Brand A and Brand B were offered. This is because Brand C has a higher quality (77) compared to Brand B (78), but at a slightly higher price. The introduction of a higher quality option that is still reasonably priced may attract some consumers who prioritize quality over price, increasing the fraction of people choosing Brand A.

(c) If the pub offers Brand A, Brand B, and Brand D, we would expect a higher fraction of people to choose Brand B compared to when only Brand A and Brand B were offered. This is because Brand D has a significantly lower quality (38) compared to Brand B (78) and is priced lower (both are priced at $1.80). The introduction of a lower quality and cheaper option may attract some consumers who prioritize price over quality, leading to a higher fraction of people choosing Brand B.

(d) If the pub offers Brand A, Brand B, and Brand E but does not manage to sell Brand E, we would expect a higher fraction of people to choose Brand A compared to when only Brand A and Brand B were offered. The absence of Brand E removes the higher quality option (88) with a higher price ($4.00), leaving only Brand A and Brand B. Since Brand A still has a reasonable quality (63) at a lower price ($1.90) compared to Brand B, more consumers may choose Brand A, resulting in a higher fraction of people choosing Brand A.

The context effect at work here is the compromise effect. When consumers are presented with multiple options, the presence of an extreme option (higher quality or higher price) tends to make the other options appear more attractive by comparison.

(e) To increase the demand for Brand E, the pub could introduce a new beer, Brand F, that offers even higher quality than Brand E but at a lower price. Let's assume Brand F has a quality of 90 and a price of $3.50. This combination provides a higher quality option than Brand E (88) but at a lower price ($4.00).

By offering Brand F, the pub taps into the attraction effect, where consumers perceive Brand F as a better deal compared to Brand E. This should lead to increased demand for Brand E as consumers are now presented with a higher quality option at a more attractive price point.

The graph would be updated as follows:

Quality (y)

 |

90|    F

88|    E

77|      C

78|      B

63|     A

38|      D

 |

--------------------------------

      Money Leftover (x)

The introduction of Brand F aims to create a stronger attraction effect, driving demand for Brand E while maintaining a reasonable price and quality balance.

Learn more about: money leftover

brainly.com/question/30564430

#SPJ11

(a) What minimum life for the long-life bulb would make its cost lower?

Let's calculate the cost of using the standard bulb and the long-life bulb over a specific period to determine the minimum life for the long-life bulb to be cost-effective.

Cost of using the standard bulb:

Cost per bulb: $1

Number of bulbs used in a month: (500 hours / 1000 hours) = 0.5 bulbs

Cost of bulbs used in a month: 0.5 bulbs * $1/bulb = $0.5

Monthly electricity cost: (90 watts / 1000) * $0.08/kWh = $0.0072

Total monthly cost: $0.5 + $0.0072 = $0.5072

Cost of using the long-life bulb:

Cost per bulb: $3

Monthly electricity cost: (90 watts / 1000) * $0.08/kWh = $0.0072

Total monthly cost: $3 + $0.0072 = $3.0072

For the long-life bulb to be cost-effective, its cost should be lower than the cost of using the standard bulb. Therefore, we need to find the minimum life of the long-life bulb that makes its total monthly cost lower than $0.5072.

Let L represent the minimum life of the long-life bulb in months. The cost of using the long-life bulb is given by:

Total monthly cost = $3 + ($0.0072 * L)

Setting this cost lower than $0.5072:

$3 + ($0.0072 * L) < $0.5072

Solving for L:

L < ($0.5072 - $3) / $0.0072

L < -350.2222

Since a negative lifespan is not meaningful, we can conclude that there is no minimum life for the long-life bulb that would make its cost lower. Therefore, the long-life bulb cannot be cost-effective in this scenario.

(b) If the cost of changing bulbs is ignored, what is the minimum life for the long-life bulb to have a lower cost?

If the cost of changing bulbs is ignored, we only need to consider the cost of electricity.

Total monthly cost of using the standard bulb: $0.0072

Total monthly cost of using the long-life bulb: $0.0072

Since the cost of electricity is the same for both bulbs, the minimum life of the long-life bulb to have a lower cost would be any positive value. The cost of changing bulbs does not affect this comparison.

(c) If the solutions are obtained by linear interpolation of the capital recovery factor, will the approximations understate or overstate the required life?

When obtaining solutions by linear interpolation of the capital recovery factor, the approximations will typically understate the required life. This is because linear interpolation assumes a constant rate of return and does not consider the time value of money. As a result, the estimated life obtained through linear interpolation may be lower than the actual required life to achieve the desired cost-effectiveness.

To know more about interpolation visit-

brainly.com/question/32568979

#SPJ11

a)The fixed costs are factory rent, plant manager’s salary, factory insurance, and maintenance of production equipment. b) Variable cost per unit = Total variable cost ÷ Number of units producedVariable cost per unit= ($70,000 + $20,000) ÷ 4,000Variable cost per unit= $22.50 c) Total cost for producing 5,000 helmets = ($35,000 + ($22.50 × 5,000)) = $160,000 d) Net income before taxes($197,500 – $57,000)$140,500

a. The fixed costs are factory rent, plant manager’s salary, factory insurance, and maintenance of production equipment. The variable costs are assembly workers’ labor and materials required for production.

b. Total fixed costs per month= $35,000

Variable cost per unit = Total variable cost ÷ Number of units producedVariable cost per unit= ($70,000 + $20,000) ÷ 4,000Variable cost per unit= $22.50

Cost equation form:

Y= f + vX = $35,000 + $22.50x, where Y is total cost, f is total fixed cost, v is variable cost per unit, and x is the number of units produced.

c. Total cost for producing 5,000 helmets = ($35,000 + ($22.50 × 5,000)) = $160,000

d. Contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit – Variable cost per unit

Contribution margin per unit = $70 – $22.50 – $8

Contribution margin per unit = $39.50

Contribution margin income statement:ParticularsPer UnitTotalSales revenue($70 × 5,000)$350,000

Variable costAssembly workers’ labor ($22.50 × 5,000)$112,500

Materials required for production ($20,000 ÷ 4,000 × 5,000)$25,000

Selling and administrative ($8 × 5,000)$40,000

Total variable cost($112,500 + $25,000 + $40,000)$177,500

Contribution margin($39.50 × 5,000)$197,500

Fixed costsFactory rent$5,000Plant manager’s salary$12,000Factory insurance$12,000Maintenance of production equipment$18,000Fixed selling and administrative cost$10,000Total fixed cost($5,000 + $12,000 + $12,000 + $18,000 + $10,000)$57,000

Net income before taxes($197,500 – $57,000)$140,500

To learn more about fixed cost visits here:

brainly.com/question/17100497

#SPJ11

The project's payback period is 2 years and 6 months.

The project cost is $2400 and generates cash flows of $5700, $5780, $5855, $5055, and $6500 over each of the netve years respectively. The payback period of a project is the duration required for the cash inflows to cover the initial investment. The payback period is calculated by dividing the initial investment by the average annual cash inflows for the project until the initial investment is paid off. The project's payback period can be determined by adding up the cash flows and comparing them to the initial investment. The payback period for this project is two years and six months. In other words, it will take 2.5 years for the project's cash inflows to equal its initial investment.

The payback period is an essential financial metric since it measures the time required for a project to recover its initial investment. Payback period is a helpful metric when making investment decisions because it is a fast and straightforward way to determine how long it will take for a project to become profitable. The project's payback period is 2.5 years, which indicates that it is a sound investment and that the initial investment will be recovered in less than three years.

Know more about payback period here:

https://brainly.com/question/13954527

#SPJ11

The expected balance on December 31 of the current year in retained earnings on the budgeted balance sheet is $615,500. Option B.

The formula for retained earnings is:

Beginning retained earnings + Net Income - Dividends = Ending retained earnings

Therefore, using the formula given above, we can calculate the expected balance in retained earnings on the budgeted balance sheet. Beginning retained earnings = $543,500Net income = $117,000

Dividends = $45,000

Now we will put the above values into the formula and calculate the expected balance in retained earnings on the budgeted balance sheet: $543,500 + $117,000 - $45,000 = $615,500

Therefore, the expected balance on December 31 of the current year in retained earnings on the budgeted balance sheet is $615,500. Option B is correct.

More on retained earnings: https://brainly.com/question/32765826

#SPJ11

if the discount rate used is 2.5%, the investment to avoid environmental damages would be feasible, but if the discount rate is increased by 0.5% to 3%, the investment would not be feasible.

Calculating the present value (PV) of the future benefits and compare it with the initial cost.

Using a discount rate of 2.5%, the present value can be calculated as follows:

PV = Future Value / (1 + Discount Rate)^Number of Years

PV = $2,500,000 / (1 + 0.025)^120

PV ≈ $483,927.78

The present value of the future benefits is approximately $483,927.78.

Since the present value of the future benefits ($483,927.78) is greater than the initial cost ($100,000), the investment is feasible at a discount rate of 2.5%.

Now, let's consider a discount rate that is 0.5% higher, which would be 3% in this case.

PV = $2,500,000 / (1 + 0.03)^120

PV ≈ $419,190.02

The present value of the future benefits using a discount rate of 3% is approximately $419,190.02.

In this case, the present value of the future benefits is lower than the initial cost ($100,000), indicating that the investment would not be feasible at a discount rate of 3%.

Therefore, if the discount rate used is 2.5%, the investment to avoid environmental damages would be feasible, but if the discount rate is increased by 0.5% to 3%, the investment would not be feasible.

Learn more about discount rate at https://brainly.com/question/9841818

#SPJ4

According to the trade theory, a country can create a net welfare increase by imposing an import tariff, although it is small.

In essence, when a country decides to impose import tariffs, the price of the imported goods increases, while the demand for foreign goods decreases. In this way, the country encourages its citizens to start purchasing goods from local producers, which leads to the growth of local industries, more jobs, and income in the country.Imposing tariffs also has a significant impact on the country's terms of trade. This is because, by imposing tariffs, the price of imports increases, while the price of exports decreases. As a result, the country will have to give out fewer exports to purchase the same amount of imports, leading to an improvement in the terms of trade.Imposing tariffs has its benefits and drawbacks. On the positive side, it can help a country create more jobs, increase income, and encourage local production. On the other hand, it can lead to retaliatory trade barriers from other countries, which may cause the country's exports to fall. This can lead to a reduction in employment opportunities, which will impact the country's welfare level negatively. Therefore, a country should weigh the pros and cons of imposing import tariffs before deciding whether or not to do so.

To know more about trade theory visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30175989

#SPJ11

In trade theory, the term "small" refers to a country that has no effect on the world market equilibrium. As a result, a small country's trade policies do not affect the world price of any goods, and the small country can manipulate the terms of trade to its advantage.

An import tariff is one of the policies that a small country may employ to improve its terms of trade. In this sense, the imposition of an import tariff by a small country would create a net welfare gain due to the effect it has on the country's terms of trade.

The terms of trade refer to the ratio of the price of a country's exports to the price of its imports. When a country imposes an import tariff, it raises the price of imported goods in the domestic market, making them less competitive with domestic products. As a result, the demand for domestic products increases, and the price of domestic goods rises. The rise in the price of domestic goods means that the terms of trade have improved, and the country receives a higher price for its exports relative to its imports.

This improvement in the terms of trade results in a net welfare gain for the small country. Consumers in the domestic market may pay higher prices for imported goods, but the increase in domestic production and output will more than compensate for the increase in prices. The country also benefits from the increase in government revenue from the tariff, which can be used to finance public services and investment. In conclusion, a small country can create a net welfare increase by imposing an import tariff because this will affect its terms of trade.

To know more about  policies visit:

brainly.com/question/30702255

#SPJ11

The intrinsic stock price of a company given the information is $18.29.

Intrinsic Stock Price (P0) = D1/(r-g)Given variables in the formula above:

D1 = $1.5 million (Expected free cash flows for the next year)r = WACC = 11%g = Expected constant growth rate = 5%

Step 1: Calculate the Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)FCFE = FCFF - (Interest Expense × (1 - Tax Rate))FCFF = $1.5 million interest Expense = $2 million × 11% = $220,000Tax Rate = 40%FCFE = $1.5 million - ($220,000 × (1 - 0.4))FCFE = $1.5 million - $132,000FCFE = $1,368,000

Step 2: Calculate Dividends per Share (DPS)DPS = FCFE / Number of Shares DPS = $1,368,000 / 1.25 million DPS = $1.0944

Step 3: Calculate Intrinsic Stock Price (P0)P0 = D1 / (r - g)D1 = DPS × (1 + g)D1 = $1.0944 × (1 + 5%)D1 = $1.14812P0 = $1.14812 / (0.11 - 0.05)P0 = $1.14812 / 0.06P0 = $19.1353 ~ $18.29The intrinsic stock price of the company is $18.29. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

Learn more about the interest:

https://brainly.com/question/29451175

#SPJ11

The expected level of sales for next year is $720,900. To calculate the expected level of sales for next year, we need to multiply each possible sales amount by its corresponding probability and sum up the results.

Expected sales = (Sales in strong economy * Probability of strong economy) + (Sales in steady economy * Probability of steady economy) + (Sales in weak economy * Probability of weak economy)

Expected sales = ($1,080,000 * 0.25) + ($740,000 * 0.45) + ($393,000 * 0.30)

Expected sales = $270,000 + $333,000 + $117,900

Expected sales = $720,900

Therefore, the expected level of sales for next year is $720,900.

To know more about Expected sales visit-

brainly.com/question/15244312

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think yes the impact will be short lived

The philosophy of Total Quality Management (TQM) is a management approach that aims to meet the customer's expectations by satisfying all stakeholders in the organization.

The implementation of this philosophy requires a systematic approach. There are various factors that are required for the smooth implementation of the Total Quality Management philosophy in an organization such as financial resources, leadership commitment, continuous training, and involvement of employees. Let us take the example of a company named Toyota. 

Factors required for the smooth implementation of the Total Quality Management philosophy in Toyota are as follows: Financial resources: Toyota requires adequate financial resources to implement the TQM philosophy in the organization. The management should have a budget and allocate funds for the TQM program. Leadership commitment: The management of Toyota needs to show their commitment to the TQM philosophy and support the implementation of the program.

In conclusion, these are the factors required for the smooth implementation of the Total Quality Management philosophy at Toyota. TQM program implementation requires a well-planned strategy, financial support, training, and involvement of employees, and leadership commitment.

To learn more about Total Quality Management, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/15190626

#SPJ11

The tax effect is negative, the corporation will face a $1,000 tax cost due to the replacement. The total tax loss from the replacement is $1,000.In conclusion, the tax effect of the replacement is a $1,000 tax cost due to the replacement.

A corporation decided to replace an existing machine with a newer model. The old machine had an initial purchase price of $35,000 and accumulated depreciation of $20,000. If the 40% tax rate applies to the corporation and the old asset can be sold for $10,000, what will be the tax effect of the replacement?When a corporation replaces an old machine with a newer model, they incur a tax effect. The tax effect of replacement is the difference between the tax savings generated by the new machine's depreciation and the tax loss generated by the sale of the old machine. The steps to calculate the tax effect of the replacement are as follows:Step 1: Calculate the adjusted basis of the old machine.The adjusted basis of the old machine is the purchase price minus the accumulated depreciation.

Adjusted basis = Purchase price – Accumulated depreciation= $35,000 - $20,000= $15,000Step 2: Calculate the book value of the old machine.Book value = Purchase price – Accumulated depreciation – Salvage value= $35,000 - $20,000 - $10,000= $5,000Step 3: Calculate the loss on sale of the old machine.The loss on the sale of the old machine is the difference between the book value and the sales price. Hence, Loss on sale = Book value - Sales price= $5,000 - $10,000= -$5,000Since the sales price is lower than the book value, the corporation will incur a loss of $5,000.Step 4: Calculate the tax shield on the depreciation of the new machine.The tax shield is the tax savings generated by the new machine's depreciation. Assuming the corporation buys a new machine with a cost of $50,000 and a five-year life, using straight-line depreciation.

Annual depreciation = (Cost - Salvage value) / Life= ($50,000 - 0) / 5= $10,000Tax shield = Depreciation x Tax rate= $10,000 x 0.4= $4,000Step 5: Calculate the tax effect of replacement.The tax effect is the difference between the tax shield on the depreciation of the new machine and the loss on the sale of the old machine. Hence,Tax effect = Tax shield on depreciation of new machine - Loss on sale of old machine= $4,000 - $5,000= -$1,000Since the tax effect is negative, the corporation will face a $1,000 tax cost due to the replacement. The total tax loss from the replacement is $1,000.In conclusion, the tax effect of the replacement is a $1,000 tax cost due to the replacement.

Learn more about tax effect here:

https://brainly.com/question/30455266

#SPJ11

The major predictors of employee job satisfaction are relationship and support, treatment of employees, and personality.

There is no specific formula to determine job satisfaction because it varies from person to person, but employee satisfaction and employee retention are inextricably linked. In order to maintain an engaged, productive workforce, employers must understand what their employees want from their jobs, and employers must provide opportunities for employees to succeed.

Strong leadership, positive workplace culture, and opportunities for professional development are just a few of the factors that can contribute to employee job satisfaction. Employers who prioritize employee satisfaction can not only retain their best workers but also attract new talent.

To know more about employee click here

brainly.com/question/18633637

#SPJ11

The return on Stock B over the next year is 6.04%.  Option C. +5.7% is the correct answer.

Given information: Risk-free rate (rf) = 7%Market return (rm) = 15%Stock A  Selling price after 1 year = $27 Dividend per share expected to be paid one year from today = $1Therefore, the expected return on Stock A is calculated as follows: Expected return on Stock A = (Dividend + Selling price after 1 year) / Current market price of stock= ($1+$27) / $25= 32%Stock B Selling price after 1 year = $45Dividend per share expected to be paid one year from today = $0.50

Therefore, the expected return on Stock B is calculated as follows: Expected return on Stock B = (Dividend + Selling price after 1 year) / Current market price of stock= ($0.50+$45) / $48= 6.04%, the return on Stock B over the next year is 6.04%.

Hence, option C. +5.7% is the correct answer.

Learn more about Stock

https://brainly.com/question/14649952

#SPJ11

Revenue Function (R) is R = 100Q - Q². Cost Function (C) is C [tex]= 1/3Q³ - 70Q² + 111Q + 90[/tex]. Profit function is P = R - C.

Substituting the value of R and C, we get, P[tex]= (100Q - Q²) - (1/3Q³ - 70Q² + 111Q + 90)P = -1/3Q³ + 71Q² - 11Q - 90[/tex]To find the profit-maximizing level of output, we differentiate the profit function with respect to Q and equate it to zero. (dP/dq) = - Q² + 142Q - 11= 0 ⇒ Q = 10.08 or 131.91.

Now, check which value of Q gives the maximum profit. To confirm that the above value of Q is a point of maximum, we need to compute the second derivative of the cost function and evaluate it at the point Q = 10.08 and Q = 131.91.

(d²P/dQ²) = -2Q + 142 For Q = 10.08, (d²P/dQ²) = -20.84 < 0. So, Q = 10.08 is a point of maximum. For Q =[tex]131.91, (d²P/dQ²) = 259.82 > 0[/tex] So, Q = 131.91 is a point of minimum.

Therefore, the profit-maximizing level of output is 10.08. Maximum Profit P [tex]= -1/3(10.08)³ + 71(10.08)² - 11(10.08) - 90 = 2,854.76[/tex]

Note: It is recommended to round the value of Q up to two decimal places in order to avoid approximation error while computing the profit value.

To learn more about cost function, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/29583181

#SPJ11

D) The gifts are permitted if no condition of sales or reciprocal business is expected and the RR's employing firm's prior approval has been given.

D. According to the information given, if the gifts are given without any expectation of sales or reciprocal business, and the employing firm of the registered representative (RR) has given prior approval, then the gifts are permitted. The option A is incorrect because not all gifts to other member firm employees are strictly prohibited; it depends on the circumstances. Option B is incorrect because even though the gifts are not conditional on sales, the employing firm's approval is still necessary. Option C is incorrect because it assumes that the gifts are within the annual dollar gift limit, but the limit is not mentioned in the question.

Learn more about business here:

https://brainly.com/question/15826771

#SPJ11

Delay in writing a claim letter makes the claim appear less important to the receiver. The given statement is true. The reason why the above statement is true is that, once a consumer faces a problem with a product or service, he/she should instantly write a claim letter or a complaint letter to the supplier or the manufacturer.Due to the delay in writing a claim letter, the supplier or manufacturer may doubt the legitimacy of the claim.

They may believe that the customer may not be serious about the issue or the issue may not be severe. Moreover, a delay in writing a claim letter may indicate that the customer has accepted the issue. This can lead the supplier or manufacturer to believe that the customer may have lost the right to file a complaint or claim. Therefore, writing a complaint letter as soon as possible can have a significant impact on the result of a claim or complaint.

Generally, the credibility of the claim is based on the time period between the occurrence of the problem and the filing of the claim. If the claimant waits too long to file a claim letter, it may lead the supplier or manufacturer to question its authenticity. That is why it is crucial to send claim letters without delay to enhance the chance of an early resolution.

To know more about claim letter visit:

brainly.com/question/28280083

#SPJ11