HELP HELP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer:

By Mohsin Hamid Ask novelists whether they spend more time watching TV or reading fiction and prepare yourself to hear them say the unsayable. Movies have always seemed to me a much tighter form of storytelling than novels, requiring greater compression, and in that sense falling somewhere between the short story and the novel in scale. To watch a feature film is to be immersed in its world for an hour and a half, or maybe two, or exceptionally three. A novel that takes only three hours to read would be a short novel indeed, and novels that last five times as long are commonplace. Television is more capacious. Episode after episode, and season after season, a serial drama can uncoil for dozens of hours before reaching its end. Along the way, its characters and plot have room to develop, to change course, to congeal. In its near limitlessness, TV rivals the novel. What once sheltered the novel were differences in the quality of writing. Films could be well written, but they were smaller than novels. TV was big, but its writing was clunky. The novel had “Pride and Prejudice”; TV had “Dynasty.” But television has made enormous leaps in the last decade or so. The writing has improved remarkably, as have the acting, direction and design. Recently we’ve been treated to many shows that seem better than any that came before: the brilliant ethnography of “The Wire,” the dazzling sci-fi of “Battlestar Galactica,” the gorgeous period re-creation of “Mad Men,” the gripping fantasy of “Game of Thrones,” the lacerating self-exploration of “Girls.” Nor is TV’s rise confined to shows originating in only one country. Pakistani, Indian, British and dubbed Turkish dramas are all being devoured here in Pakistan. Thanks to downloads, even Denmark’s “Borgen” has found its local niche. I now watch a lot of TV. And I’m not alone, even among my colleagues. Ask novelists today whether they spend more time watching TV or reading fiction and prepare yourself, at least occasionally, to hear them say the unsayable. That this represents a crisis for the novel seems to me undeniable. But a crisis can be an opportunity. It incites change. And the novel needs to keep changing if it is to remain novel. It must, pilfering a phrase from TV, boldly go where no one has gone before. In the words of the Canadian writer Sheila Heti: “Now that there are these impeccable serial dramas, writers of fiction should feel let off the hook more — not feel obliged to worry so much about plot or character, since audiences can get their fill of plot and character and story there, so novelists can take off in other directions, like what happened with painting when photography came into being more than a hundred years ago. After that there was an incredible flourishing of the art, in so many fascinating directions. The novel should only do what the serial drama could never do.” Television is not the new novel. Television is the old novel. In the future, novelists need not abandon plot and character, but would do well to bear in mind the novel’s weirdness…. Novels are characterized by their intimacy, which is extreme, by their scale, which is vast, and by their form, which is linguistic and synesthetic…. Television gives us something that looks like a small world, made by a group of people who are themselves a small world. The novel gives us sounds pinned down by hieroglyphs, refracted flickerings inside an individual. Sufis tell of two paths to transcendence: One is to look out at the universe and see yourself, the other is to look within yourself and see the universe. Their destinations may converge, but television and the novel travel in opposite directions.

What advantages does Hamid say contemporary television has over the novel? In what ways does Hamid lend credibility to his argument? In an essay of 300 words or more, and using evidence from the text, analyze this argument about the advantages of television, identifying three persuasive examples Hamid uses to bolster his argument.

Explanation:

Hamid shows that today's televisions work better and have more elaborate and complex plots and this attracts the public's attention more intensely.

Hamid talks about this in the article "Are the New ‘Golden Age’ TV Shows the New Novels?" where he shows that in the past people read more than listen to television, but nowadays these roles have been reversed and television has attracted more and more viewers, while books have lost readers.

Hamid says that this has happened because:

With this, we can conclude that televisions have attracted a larger audience because they have invested in quality both in their operation and in their productions.

You can find more information about this at the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/20393662?referrer=searchResults

Answer: One little known invention of Edison's was the"vocal engine."

Explanation:

Answer:

Quindlen wrote from his point of view in response to the attacks of September 11. It makes me understand the tragedy better and it can be used to unites American citizens all over. His personal point of view will persuade readers to rethink the meaning and value of American identity.

Explanation:  Just reworded it a bit differently so it's not exactly like the sample response.

In Quindlen's op-ed piece written in response to the September 11 attacks, the context significantly influences the understanding of the central idea.

The tragedy of 9/11 serves as a catalyst for Quindlen's perspective that such events have the power to bring Americans together despite their differences. The heightened sense of unity and solidarity in the aftermath of the attacks prompts readers to reconsider the significance and worth of American identity, highlighting the resilience and strength of the nation in the face of adversity.

The context of the tragic event underscores the importance of recognizing and appreciating the diverse elements that contribute to the fabric of America while also acknowledging the ongoing challenges of intolerance and hatred that persist.

For more details regarding Quindlen's op-ed piece, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11667675

#SPJ2

Answer:

Conflict is the clash or disargument between group of people, institute etc.

Answer:

A conflict is a disagreement or a serious difference in opinion between people. A conflict can also refer to war or fight between countries. Its a dissimilarity in ideas, opinions, or interests. Conflict may also refer to incompatibility or variance and clash of events.

Answer:

My teacher asked if I could borrow a pen.

Explanation:

Answer:

Forgiveness-Having the strength/feeling to accept someone's apology.

justice-Gaining a "win" when someone has made you feel a certain way.

Example:Bob pushed me so I got him in trouble with the teacher.

Forgiveness and justice contrast because I could not get justice and just forgive bob.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Q: Match the excerpts to the literary and poetic devices they use

Explanation:

You can take this as u please.

Btw plato_+

Answer: A. correctly written

Explanation:

Answer:

A doll would be made by him.

Explanation:

Answer:

The narrator's point of view allows the reader to develop a better understanding of the author's opinion. The narrator's point of view allows the reader to understand the perspectives of all of the characters.

Answer:

la respuesta es 3

Explanation:

esperó que te sirva

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

Its C because the passage gives details about the toys that the children in Wash's street had.

Explanation:

1. Canada ranks number one as the most educated country in the world. In Canada, 56.71% of adults have earned some kind of post-secondary education.

2. America ranks sixth, with 45.67% of its adult population having completed tertiary education.

Answer:

The Sun warms our planet and creates tides along with the Moon due to gravitational force. The Moon orbits the Earth causing moon phases, while the Earth orbits the Sun, causing seasons.

Explanation:

This is supposed to be in the science section but ok :')

Answer:

1: half, quarter, quarter

2: half, half

3: quarter, quarter, quarter, quarter

4: quarter, quarter, half

Explanation:

filled in note = quarter note(1 beat each)

empty note = half note(2 beats each)

I learned in choir class. :)

Answer:

false

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

She was hesitant after she had aged so much after living with the fairies.

Answer:

When RIP woke up from his 20 year-sleep, he found a different town.

Explanation:

Answer:

Kind of

Explanation:

Everyone is different. We are all unique. Some people may enjoy high school more than others. One person could be having the time of their life. They could be popular and be passing all classes. But someone else might not be doing so well.They could be getting bullied and failing classes. It depends on how your high school experience goes.

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

"When we help others, we help ourselves."

Please mark brainliest <3 I really need it. I hope this answer helps you.

Answer: The answer is C!

Explanation:

Give other person Brainiest. (I think I spelled it right)

Have a great day! :>

Answer:

Jem from to kill a mocking bird, no clue what it means I've never read the book

Answer:

If I could travel back into time, I'd go back to 2019 to fix a huge wrong I have made.

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes!

Explanation:

A verb is usually  a word to describe an action so stumbled would be considered a verb.

The Weary Climber is the subject, because it is the thing/person that is performing the action.

Answer:

Try Grammarly

Explanation:

Answer:

Grammarly could possibly help. I don't know how well it will work for you, but it works great for me!

Explanation: