?????????????hmmmmmm

Answer:

Explanation:

presidents

Topic: Is there too much pressure on teenagers to go to college?

How to write a good essay: A good argument needs to have reasonable and convincing evidence. Better support your statement with information, figures, examples, and some relevant opinions. Also, argumentative speech does not contain unproven opinions. And an optional counter argument.

Answer:

key: A

Chords: G, Em, C, and D in each verse respectively

Verse 1

My family is funny 'cause

sometimes we laugh at silly jokes

We say, we stay, we go, we come

we paint our lives with tiny strokes

Verse 2

My family is funny 'cause

sometimes we fight at silly hoax

but let me tell you that's for sure

My family is my true love.

Explanation:

A strophic Form is a form of music where a verse or a phrase is repeated many times so that it's catchy for the listener. The structure of the Strophic Form is AAAA…

The start of each line in the song is played with the corresponding chord in the same order (G, Em, C, D). The lyrics talk about how you can have fun with your family and other times you can fight, but at the end of the day, you love them no matter what.  

Answer:

The favor that the author talks about in the title is favor to New Orleans by American citizens.

Explanation:

"An Editorial: It's time for a nation to return the favor" is an article published on November 20, 2005.

The favor that the author is talking about in the title is the favor New Orleans have on America. The author lists the resources that New Orleans offers to America, to which author is obliged. But the author also asks the citizen to sign Congress's petition for New Orleans.

Answer:

chapter 19

Jonas apologizes to the Giver for having wasted so much of their time on questions about release. Jonas explains that part of the reason he is curious about release is that his father is going to release a twin today. Actually, Jonas reflects, it probably happened this morning

chapter 20

On the morning of the annual Ceremony, Jonas will leave his bicycle by the river. Meanwhile, The Giver hides Jonas in the trunk of a vehicle and drives Jonas a ways to give him a good start on his escape. When people discover Jonas is missing, and then find his bicycle by the river, they'll think that he's drowned.

hope this helps

have a good day :)

Explanation:

The correct answer is C. Everyone in the community helps take care of Shadow.

Explanation

The text fragment is an allusion to a dog named Shadow, the dog of a neighborhood, this means that he does not have a single owner within the neighborhood. Therefore, it is possible to affirm that by belonging to the neighborhood all the inhabitants of that neighborhood help take care of Shadow because he is the pet of all the people who live there. So the correct answer is C.Everyone in the community helps take care of Shadow.

Answer:

Health is influenced by many factors, which may generally be organized into five broad categories known as determinants of health: genetics, behavior, environmental and physical influences, medical care and social factors. These five categories are interconnected.

Answer:

something (very convoluted answer).

Explanation:

It helps if you go word by word.

Cherie : Proper noun

will give: verb

something: what is this? Let's just leave it for a second.

special: this is an adjective, but what does it modify?

to: a preposition beginning of a phrase

her: a possessive pronoun

cousin: what's being possessed. and it's a noun.

So we have to go back to something. It's a pronoun or an adverb. It's not an adverb because it would have to modify special. What kind of a special is something? So it must be an indefinite pronoun.

We are not sure what something is, but it takes the place of the noun that Cherie is going to give her cousin.

Answer:rt is one of my favorite subjects because I enjoy expressing what is on my mind with pictures and color. Georgia O'Keeffe was an artist but not a certain kind of artist. She was her own kind of artist. Joan Didion wrote this essay to make the readers understand to be their own person and to pursue their own ideas. Anyone can draw a flower but not everyone sees the flower the same. O'Keeffe once said, " Where I was born and where and how I lived is unimportant. It is what I have done and with where I have been that should be of interest." What she means by this is that what is interesting is what she has done with where she has been. What matters is her art.

   Didion took her daughter to the Chicago Art Institute one day and that was the day her and her daughter saw that the glory in Georgia O'Keeffe's work reflected a glory in its maker. This basically means that the painting was the painter and every choice made in the artwork was made alone, by the thoughts of just one person. It showed character and "Style is character.", says Didion. O'Keeffee's ability to show her style through her paintings gave Didion the ability to sort of translate who she is as a person. O;Keefee's paintings and her judgment toward the words people use about her paintings is how she profiles the artist. She descries the artist "...Simply hard, a straight shooter, a women clean of received wisdom and open to what she sees. This is a women who could early on dismiss most of her contemporaries as "dreamy," and would later single out one she liked as "a very poor painter". Didon sees O'Keeffe as strong and free to speak her mind which was a very hard personality to have back in that time of men power.

   Throughout O'Keeffe's life she has been told what to draw by "the men". The men tell her that her art is impossible but she proves them wrong. Didion repeats O’Keeffe’s words, “I made you take time to look at what I saw and when you took time to really notice my flower you hung all your associations with flowers on my flower and you write about my flower as if I think and see what you think and see — and I don’t”. O’Keeffe words shows the defiance and boldness she has despite the thoughts that others have on her. She doe not care what other people think and that is a hard lesson to give to readers. People care so much about what others think because it hurts to be judged but O'Keeffe's personality can spark a change in someone's life and that is why Didion is using her as an example to portray that lesson. Didion explains O'Keeffe's past starting out as an artist with being often criticized and rejected. People would paint over her art which is probably what gave her a “hard shell”.

   What is being portrayed in this essay is that art is meant to express yourself. Do not paint certain tings because it is what people want. Paint your style because people can read your character just by looking at your paintings. That is what Didion did to O'Keeffe. She was able to figure out what type of person O'Keeffe was just by reading and look at the paintings. She lived in a time where men dominated over women and despite all of the difficulties, she still lived her life blissfully painting and expressing her own feelings and thoughts.

Explanation:

Answer:

The writer uses metaphor to tell the audience that England will defeat Germany in the war.

Explanation:

According to the given excerpt from the speech "Cause of the Great War", the narrator talks about how Great Britain and other countries begged Germany not to invade Belgium because if they did so, their Allies would fight back, but they refused to take heed and tried to act like they were the ones that started the war.

The statement that accurately describes the use of rhetorical devices in this excerpt is that the writer uses metaphor to tell the audience that England will defeat Germany in the war.

Hello. You did not inform the article to which the question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.

"Animals Make Us Human" is a text written by Temple Grandin, where we can see how animals have sensations and feelings as similar as ours, that is, animals feel happiness, sadness, fear, among others. This allows them to identify very intensely with humans, especially dogs that can teach us valuable lessons. In this case, to answer your question, you should read your article and look for arguments that show how we can learn from dogs, that is, you should look for arguments that show the dogs involved in inspiring and educational moments and activities. These arguments must be capable of justifying Grandin's position in relation to animals.

Explanation:

One Monday in May 2013, a tornado had approached the town. Diana's daughter, Monica was at her school, and her mother brought her home before the tornado comes. all of Monicas classmates were under desks.

Although she got there, the tornado was closer so they hid in a bathroom, then the tornado hit, tearing the roof from the school. They looked up and saw trees and cars floating.

After it hit, they went home and couldn't find Pete. They did hear him though, he was in a cupboard under the stairs.

After they saved him, the whole house collapsed. Other people weren't as lucky as them, as 24 people had died.

Answer:

Explanation:

I interpret this quote as, if you have the self-confidence you can succeed at anything, and you can only achieve what your mind believes.

Answer:you know what nevermind

EXPLATION: just because this is

Answer:

compound

Explanation:

It is because it is a sentence with more than one subject or predicate.

Answer: She had a very rich voice, a voice everyone likes and voice people would do anything just to hear it.

Explanation:

Answer:

Probably referring to that her voice sounds sweet or nice.

Explanation:

When you refer to money, you think of riches, nice things and all that. When Gatsby says that Daisy's voice is full of money it sounds very valuable. Most likely you'll get good, positive vibes.

Answer: im guessing b srry if wrong

Explanation: cause al human need food water etc.. wich are basic needs

Answer:

B

Explanation:

B they have the same basic needs.!

Answer:

always

Explanation:

always is an adverb and is used to modify the verb

Answer:

Always

Explanation:

An adverb is a word that describes how something is done, so it's basically an adjective mixed with a verb. So always is your answer.

hope this helps

Answer:

Narrating my experience visiting a science fair.

Explanation:

I love science, be it the chemicals, the apparatus, or the reactions, the bubble, the 'all so dangerous' experiments done in labs.

One day, my school organized a science trip to a science fair that was organized by our neighboring state. Since the trip is going to take us a couple of days, we were asked to pack for a two-day trip, which was more awesome as it will be my first time not only attending a science fair but also on an overnight trip, away from home.

The journey took us about 3 hours and by 11 am, we have reached the venue. The hotel where we are to stay was nearby so we dropped out bags at the hotel and immediately leave for the science fair.

I couldn't believe what I saw. There were crowds of people, moving in all directions. There were many exhibits, be it robotic, or even competitions making some chemical reactions to impress the people. One stall that caught my eye was the creative stall where they would try to create some kind of fog or 'gas' to distract the onlookers while the real aim was to produce a safe, jelly-like solution that can enable people to sculpt figures of their choice, and also change colors.

Moving on to the next stall, we saw students from some schools displaying their creations- robots that can move and serve people, carry trays and also carry babies and lull them to sleep. All these were so impressive, I wonder what else is there that man cannot make. And remember, these things were made by school kids, not even adults.

Our two-day science fair trip went about in a haze, me moving from one stall to another trying to experience and see everything. At the end of the second day, there was a competition between the major contenders of the stalls on making the most impressive creation. And the stall with the robots won the prize, which they rightly deserve.  

Coming back home, I was more confident of studying hard and becoming one of them.  

Answer:

the first one ( i think )

Explanation:

Answer:

Meg made her gooey, delicious brownies for this year's spring picnic

Explanation:

because your useing to adjectives

relation

function

input

output

Answer:

what

Explanation:

Answer:

I think the answer would be C "“Elinor started at this declaration, and was sorry for the warmth she had been betrayed into, in speaking of him.” (paragraph 23)"

Explanation:

Answer:c

Explanation:

I got 100

Answer:

Sex with a minor

Explanation:

Answer:

strenth

Explanation:

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Plural subject (birds) with singular verb conjugation (lands).

The sentence with a problem with subject-verb agreement is "Two birds lands on a branch." The verb "lands" should agree with the subject "birds," which is plural. It should be "Two birds land on a branch." Therefore, option (A) is correct.

Subject-verb agreement is a grammatical rule that states that the subject of a sentence and its corresponding verb must agree in number, meaning that a singular subject should have a singular verb, and a plural subject should have a plural verb.

For example, in the sentence "She walks to school," the singular subject "she" is paired with the singular verb "walks." In the sentence "They walk to school," the plural subject "they" is paired with the plural verb "walk."

Errors in subject-verb agreement can lead to confusion and miscommunication in writing and speaking. It is important to pay attention to the number of subjects and verbs in a sentence and ensure that they agree appropriately to convey the intended meaning.

Learn more about subject-verb agreement, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29783458

#SPJ3

Answer:

I would like to be an anesthesiologist. An anesthesiologist can work anywhere were they use anesthesia. So I could work at a hospital or dentist offices. I want to be an anesthesiologist because the work force needs more of them.

Explanation:

Answer:

When it comes to planned, non-spontaneous texts including written discourse and speeches, the manner in which the text is put together can be explained by elements of coherence and cohesion. While spontaneous discourse will also display coherence and cohesion, it is emphasized in planned texts because there is a greater deal of thought and intention behind the use of cohesive ties and devices of coherence.

They can however often be difficult concepts to grasp. For starters, it is essential to understand the difference between the two terms.

Coherence is defined as the quality of being logical, consistent and able to be understood. Imagine coherence as a building (It’s an analogy, go with it).

Cohesion on the other hand refers to the act of forming a whole unit. It is effectively a subset of coherence. Picture cohesion as the bricks and cement which make up the building.

Bricks and cement can be put together to create any form of structure. However, it is only when they are laid together properly that they form a building. Similarly, a text will be cohesive if cohesive ties are used however it will only be coherent if the cohesive ties are used appropriately to create meaning.

You can have cohesion without coherence but you cannot have coherence without cohesion. The picture does not make sense unless the correct pieces are placed in the correct order, even if certain pieces may be the same size and shape.

“I bought some hummus to eat with celery. Green vegetables can boost your metabolism. The Australian Greens is a political party. I couldn’t decide what to wear to the new year’s party.”

In the example above, there are lexical links from one sentence to the next; cohesive ties are used to join the sentences. There is evidence of lexical repetition, ‘green’ ‘party’ and collocations, ‘new years’.  

However, this string of sentences do not make any sense; there is no binding semantic link. This is an example of cohesion without coherence.

‍

Cohesive devices effectively help the discourse flow. They include collocations, lexical repetition, linking adverbials, substitution, ellipsis, conjunctions, synonymy/antonymy, hypernyms/hyponyms and referencing (anaphoric, cataphoric, deictic). These devices create physical links between the words in a discourse.

Coherence which we previously defined as understanding can be achieved through devices such as cohesive ties, formatting techniques, inference, logical ordering of information, semantic patterning and consistency.

These all enhance the ability of a text to be successfully interpreted and understood. Recipes, terms and condition documents, informative brochures all make use of formatting in the form of headings, bolding, underlines etc. to emphasis certain aspects of the text and draw audience attention to the most important elements.

The focus of coherence factors is determined by the social purpose of the text. Is the text made to entertain? Inform? Persuade? Celebrate? If so, why? What is the overarching intention of the text? Answering such questions can help explain the purpose of coherence factors and cohesive devices within a discourse.

This is effectively what you are aiming to do in your analytical commentaries and short answer questions in the exam. Identify the social purposes of the text and use them to explain the role of coherence and cohesion within the discourse.

The other major factor of consideration is the intended audience of the text. Is the text aimed at teenagers? the Australian public? Or specifically to “bogan” Australians? The language choices and ideas implied in the text will reflect the intended audience. If a text is aimed at Victorian’s it may include lexemes such as “Mornington Peninsula” or “Shepparton” which Victorian’s can infer as locations within Victoria, however these terms would need to be further explained to those who reside outside this state. Lexical choices which require outside inference would be included if it can be reasonably interpreted that the intended audience would be aware of their meaning. Finding examples of inference in texts can be useful in identifying the social purpose of the text.