Answer:
lol
Explanation:
Should American teenagers join political parties? State why or why not. Please explain your reasoning with five facts about political parties.
Answer:
It depends on your age. If you are 16-19, yes because you are approaching the age to legally vote. If you are younger, maybe think about your political party that your thinking about joining. Think about your beliefs and why you want those rights.
Explanation:
what was the effect of city growth on women ?
Answer:
As indicated by Cathy Mcllwaine of the University of London, while urbanization could give ladies an occasion to successfully adapt to savagery because of accessible institutional help and monetary assets, frequently "social relations can be more divided, which can prompt more prominent rate of viciousness, as can the weights of metropolitan living, for example, destitution, commitment in particular sorts of occupation, low quality everyday environments and the actual setup of metropolitan regions."
Explanation:
How does this part of the text help FDR achieve his goal for giving the speech?
It tells the story of one American who lost a job.
It lists facts and details related to the new program.
It explains the goal of this particular New Deal program.
It describes problems that would occur if the program were not put into place.
Answer:
the answer is C
It explains the goal of this particular New Deal program.
Explanation:
edg 2020
PLEASE ANSWER QUICKLY 15 POINTS!!
Answer:
I believe it's b sorry if I'm wrong
Answer:
A. when a country is relying on another country for goods and/or service
Explanation:
HELP ME
HELP ME
HELP ME
Answer:
how can i help u????
Explanation:
u can tell me how can i help u
we can be frnds if u agreee
In what two ways did the Massachusetts Government Act change the way Massachusetts?
Answer:
It put a military government in place. It created the position of royal governor. It let the colonists rule themselves.
Explanation:
Did the quiz
Study the image above. Which of the following should you place on the line labeled "F"?
Judicial
Congress
Executive
Legislative
Which statements describe factors that led to the decline and defeat of the Aztec Empire? Brainiest to whoever gets it right
Choose all answers that are correct.
The Aztecs were friendly when the Spanish first arrived and brought them gifts.
Despite negotiations, the Spanish and the Aztecs went to war, though neither side wanted to.
Peoples who had been conquered by the Aztecs joined the Spanish to help defeat them.
The Aztecs had no strong leaders and limited military skills.
The Aztecs had never seen steel weapons or horses before.
Answer:
: the answers are A,D,E for B is backwards and C is plainly false they had a strong Empire
Explanation:
pls give me brainliest
ALL of the colonies sent delegates to the Constitutional Convention
Question 1 options:
True
False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Gerogia did not attend
What is a government that is run by a small group of people?
Select one:
A. democracy
B. autocracy
C. oligarchy
D. communism
Answer:
its C oligarchy
what were some strategies used by the labor unions to address the problematic working conditions of the time period.
Answer:
Death????/
Explanation:
Who watches seven deadly sins if so who is ur favorite character mine is Escanor
Answer:
Mine too!
Explanation:
Answer:
Nanatsuno
Explanation:
What type of government did the Mycenaeans have?
A. a democracy where the people voted on decisions
B. a monarchy ruled by a king who made all decisions
C. a theocracy ruled by priests who claimed to speak with the gods
D. an oligarchy where a small group of people ruled together
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The government system of the Mycenaeans was ruled by Kings who monopolized, or acquired, priestly functions. This means that the kings also served as the priests, which made it easier to declare themselves chosen by the gods. In a kingdom, as most people know, the kings (or in this case, Wanax's) were in charge.
A monarchy ruled by a king who made all decisions that type of government the Mycenaeans have. The correct option is B.
What happened Mycenaeans?Given the broken pottery and damaged walls, some researchers think that major natural catastrophes like earthquakes and volcanic eruptions were to blame for the demise of the Mycenaean civilization. These catastrophes would have been devastating, and a change in climate could have resulted from volcanic eruptions.
After at least three generations of rule, the Perseid dynasty came to an end under Eurytheus, who according to legend assigned Hercules to carry out the 12 labors. Atreus succeeded to the throne of Mycenae when Eurytheus was killed in battle. As the home of Agamemnon, the son of Atreus, Mycenae is perhaps best known in mythology.
Thus, the ideal selection is option B.
Learn more about Mycenaeans here:
https://brainly.com/question/18446084
#SPJ6
In at least 150-200 words, discuss the pros and cons of westward expansion in the state of Georgia. Consider both the yeoman farmers and Native Americans in your response.
Answer: Pros- here was territorial expansion Proponents of the movement said that with Manifest Destiny, America became what it is today, one of the most powerful countries in the world. When our forefathers followed what was destined for America, the U.S. was able to acquire more properties as well as gold. This also made it possible for more immigrants to have chance to start new lives. It brought more land for farming and improvement.
Those who were in favor of the movement said that with more land area acquired, there were more agriculture land made available which was good for the economy and for supply of food and vegetables for the people. The Manifest Destiny made it possible for the merchants and farmers to produce more crops to consume and sell. It was good for trade and industry.
Proponents said that this opened new doors for trading to other countries. By acquiring lands from other places and even other countries, like Alaska which was bought from Russia, there will be more routes for trade and barter.As it doubled the land area of the U.S., it also increased goods, services and wealth.
Some advocates said that not only did the movement increase the size of the country, expanding to other countries and not just states, but it also added to farm lands needed to produce products and poultry. Moreover, with the territorial expansion not only in Asia but also in Europe, more ports for trade were opened and all these added to the reserves of the country, thus, it brought about more wealth. The gold rush of 1849 is one of the significant events in American history and this happened within the period where Manifest Destiny evolved. It paved the way for Americans to share their culture.
People who lived in the new territories were influenced with the way of life of Americans. It offered a chance for exploration.
One of the benefits advocates for Manifest Destiny claimed was that Americans were given the chance to discover other places other than the community they grew up in. This was not only great for economic improvement but also for personal gain, spiritually, emotionally and socially. By given the chance to be settlers, Americans were able to maximize their potential, discover new ways of living and learn to be innovative. As a whole, this was able to bring more benefits than drawbacks to the American people.
Cons-It brought conflict and war. Opponents of Manifest Destiny argued that this philosophy resulted to war between countries and even the civil war. As early as 1822, the U.S. was already in conflict with Great Britain over the division of Oregon. It also gave a reason for the U.S. to start a war with Mexico and Spain. It was a time of slavery.
One of the drawbacks of U.S. territorial expansion was the proliferation of slavery. Although the Americans made a promise that they will not be taking the land of other people, like the Native Americans, without their consent and other than through peaceful means, history showed that this did not really happen. It led to the death and suffering of many people, particularly, the Indians.
Opponents claim that Manifest Destiny brought about suffering to the people whose land were taken from them without their consent. Along the way, many people were killed and there was mass destruction of tribes. Indians were brought to reservations as well. It is unconstitutional.
Those who are not in favor of what the Manifest Destiny stood for said that what the Southerners did, which was spread slavery, was against the constitution and so is taking other territories that do not really belong to them. They also argued that those who pushed for territorial expansion already knew beforehand that the Native Americans will be uprooted to give way for white settlers and international railroad links and yet they still proceeded. For critics, this is clearly a violation of the rights of the people. Abolitionists said that the constitution did not give the country the right for acquisition of new land areas.
Explanation: I wrote more than 150-200 word but this is like 2-3 paragraphs
Answer: Pros- here was territorial expansion Proponents of the movement said that with Manifest Destiny, America became what it is today, one of the most powerful countries in the world. When our forefathers followed what was destined for America, the U.S. was able to acquire more properties as well as gold. This also made it possible for more immigrants to have chance to start new lives. It brought more land for farming and improvement.
Those who were in favor of the movement said that with more land area acquired, there were more agriculture land made available which was good for the economy and for supply of food and vegetables for the people. The Manifest Destiny made it possible for the merchants and farmers to produce more crops to consume and sell. It was good for trade and industry.
Proponents said that this opened new doors for trading to other countries. By acquiring lands from other places and even other countries, like Alaska which was bought from Russia, there will be more routes for trade and barter.As it doubled the land area of the U.S., it also increased goods, services and wealth.
Some advocates said that not only did the movement increase the size of the country, expanding to other countries and not just states, but it also added to farm lands needed to produce products and poultry. Moreover, with the territorial expansion not only in Asia but also in Europe, more ports for trade were opened and all these added to the reserves of the country, thus, it brought about more wealth. The gold rush of 1849 is one of the significant events in American history and this happened within the period where Manifest Destiny evolved. It paved the way for Americans to share their culture.
People who lived in the new territories were influenced with the way of life of Americans. It offered a chance for exploration.
One of the benefits advocates for Manifest Destiny claimed was that Americans were given the chance to discover other places other than the community they grew up in. This was not only great for economic improvement but also for personal gain, spiritually, emotionally and socially. By given the chance to be settlers, Americans were able to maximize their potential, discover new ways of living and learn to be innovative. As a whole, this was able to bring more benefits than drawbacks to the American people.
Cons-It brought conflict and war. Opponents of Manifest Destiny argued that this philosophy resulted to war between countries and even the civil war. As early as 1822, the U.S. was already in conflict with Great Britain over the division of Oregon. It also gave a reason for the U.S. to start a war with Mexico and Spain. It was a time of slavery.
One of the drawbacks of U.S. territorial expansion was the proliferation of slavery. Although the Americans made a promise that they will not be taking the land of other people, like the Native Americans, without their consent and other than through peaceful means, history showed that this did not really happen. It led to the death and suffering of many people, particularly, the Indians.
Opponents claim that Manifest Destiny brought about suffering to the people whose land were taken from them without their consent. Along the way, many people were killed and there was mass destruction of tribes. Indians were brought to reservations as well. It is unconstitutional.
Those who are not in favor of what the Manifest Destiny stood for said that what the Southerners did, which was spread slavery, was against the constitution and so is taking other territories that do not really belong to them. They also argued that those who pushed for territorial expansion already knew beforehand that the Native Americans will be uprooted to give way for white settlers and international railroad links and yet they still proceeded. For critics, this is clearly a violation of the rights of the people. Abolitionists said that the constitution did not give the country the right for acquisition of new land areas.
Explanation: Pls give branliest this is odessy. Thank You
Which statements accurately describe the social structure of the Spanish colonies?
Choose all answers that are correct.
Mixed race people called Mestizo were free but usually poor.
The social structure became more flexible as lower classes gained wealth and power.
Native peoples suffered from prejudice because they refused to work as hard as the Creoles did.
Those who came from Spain, peninsulares, held all the power and wealth and the best positions in the colonies.
People of Spanish descent born in America were called Creoles and rarely obtained jobs with the government.
Answer:
The answer is A,D,E I hope this helps
Explanation:
The correct option is and A). Mixed race people called Mestizo were free but usually poor and B).The social structure became more flexible as lower classes gained wealth and power.
What does the social structure mean?Social structure refers to the organized set of the social institutions and patterns of standardize relationships that together create a society. It is a structure which is built up by persons who are living within a group.
Social structure is the patterned and stable social arrangements in society whereby the humans interacts with each other and live together. It is often treated as a concept of social change within a society.
Spanish colonies follow the social structure that was divided into a caste system. The social structure in the Spanish colonies are as follows Peninsula, Creoles, Mestizos, Mulattoes, Native Americans and Africans.
Learn more about social structure here:-
https://brainly.com/question/13465651
#SPJ2
7. Why is it important to a community for people to have good citizenship?
Answer:
it is important because it helps bring the commun ity together and it will make their community a better enviroment
Explanation:
The Green Corn Rebellion began as an effort to protest against
A rising corn and wheat prices
B. falling corn and wheat prices
C. American involvement in the war
D. American neutrality in the war
How might recent events in the United States have influenced the turnoutand the outcome of the elections
Answer:
The handlement of crisises and "wars" (Im not sure if whats happening in the middle east can be called wars) have Americans rethinking the leadership of our president and might make them change parties or canidates for the next election OR people might like how our president handles things and want him to stay in office.
Explanation:
I hope this is what youre looking for:)
The Harappan civilization was known for:
A. Following the Hindu religion.
B. Refusing to trade with its neighbors.
C. Planning complex cities.
D. Failing to create a writing system.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
The Indus River Valley Civilization, also known as Harappan civilization, developed the first accurate system of standardized weights and measures, some as accurate as to 1.6 mm. Harappans created sculpture, seals, pottery, and jewelry from materials, such as terracotta, metal, and stone.
What were the "head and master” statutes?
agreements made by the presidential candidates of 1824
treaties between the Louisiana government and foreign traders
laws created to ensure husbands controlled family property
negotiations between suffrage advocates and the Louisiana government
Answer:
Its C
Explanation:
i already know the answer isnt c.
Answer:
D i think
Explanation:
who is queen Elizabeth how is she important??
Explanation: Queen Elizabeth II has since 1952 served as reigning monarch of the United Kingdom (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and numerous other realms and territories, as well as head of the Commonwealth, the group of 53 sovereign nations that includes many former British territories.
Each of the following was necessary for an Egyptian to reach the afterlife except __________.
A.
mummification
B.
prayer to Amun
C.
possession of earthly goods
D.
travel through the underworld
D : Travel through the under
Answer:
D. Travel through the underworld.
Hope this helps!
--Applepi101
Please answer the questions!
The ones that i answered were incorrect so pick the one that would be correct.
Will give brainlist to first answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
13 points!!!!!!!
Answer:
it would be a because it had no trade i hope this helps
Explanation:
Answer:
question 4 is B
Explanation:
What gains and losses did women make in the 1930's and 1940's?
What comparisons can you make to the modern day?
Please write a logical answer.
Answer:
From 1930 to 1940, the number of employed women in the United States ... “Women were more insulated from job loss because they were ... New Deal increased demand for secretarial roles that women rushed to ... as 'birds of passage' coming here do jobs American didn't want to do.
Explanation:
I NEED HELP NOW ! FIRST TO ANWSER GETS BRAINLYEST or whatever it's called
When was the first time women could play on a team for soccer in schools?
Answer:
1895 I believe
Explanation:
Answer:
1895
Explanation:
(sorry if this is not right hopefully this helped)
What statement is most consistent (accurate) with the views of Loyalists in the 1770s?
The king is violating the rights of British citizens.
Taxation without representation is tyranny.
Citizens, under British rule, have the right to declare independence.
The colonists should be grateful to be under British rule and protection.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's the last one.
Explanation:
Loyalist are on the king's side so this one makes more sence.
Answer:
Why did many Americans believe that British tax laws were unfair? colonists ... Which statement shows the views of a Loyalist in the 1770s? *the colonists should be grateful to be under British rule and protection *taxation without representation is tyranny *citizens, under British rule, have the right to declare independence
Explanation:
Roger Bannister: The Barrier Breaker
Introduction
How do you overcome obstacles that seem impossible? Sir Roger Bannister, the first man to break the four-minute-mile record, knew what it was like to break barriers.
Learning a Passion
Roger Bannister was born in Harrow, England, in 1929. Since his parents couldn't afford to send him to college, he worked to win scholarships to study medicine at Oxford. Bannister had two loves: studying medicine and running track. He worked hard to do well at both. Because of his studies, Bannister had less time for track practice than other athletes. Most athletes trained at least six days a week. Bannister trained only two to three times a week. In the 1952 Olympic Games, Bannister ran the 1500m race but finished fourth. Many said this was due to his lack of training. Bannister decided it was time to get serious. He focused on doing what everyone in the world thought was impossible. He wanted to break the four-minute-mile barrier.
Setting a Goal
No one in history had ever run a mile in less than four minutes, although several had tried. For decades, physicians believed that running a mile too fast would cause heart failure. Bannister knew he could set a new world record by working hard. Bannister believed that pushing himself beyond the pain would make him a winner. That is just what Bannister did on May 6, 1954, at Iffley Road Track in Oxford. On a cold, wet track, Roger Bannister broke the four-minute-mile barrier with a time of 3:59.4. Two other runners helped him set a fast pace. Then Bannister relied on his training to run the first three laps of the track in 3:01. During the final lap of the race against the clock, Bannister knew he could finish the race in less than 59 seconds. He broke away from the other runners and flew down the last two curves of the track at record speed. As he crossed the finish line, he collapsed into the arms of his friend Reverend Nicholas Stacey. Bannister was out of breath and out of energy, but he knew he had broken the world record. Bannister accomplished a great moment in history that day.
After breaking the four-minute-mile barrier, Bannister competed in a few more races. He ran his personal record of 3:43.8 in the 1500m in the European Championship. That was Bannister's last race. In August of 1954, he retired at the age of 25 to focus on what he considered his true contribution to society—his research in the field of neurology, the study of the nerves and the nervous system.
Making a Difference
In 1975, two decades after his feat, Roger Bannister was knighted by the Sports Council of England. He had done what no man thought was possible. However, Bannister knew his athletic glory was fleeting. He felt that his work as a neurologist was the real accomplishment of his life. For over 40 years, he worked in neurology, helping patients who suffered serious neurological disorders. To honor his work and dedication as a neurologist, St. Mary's Hospital in London named a lecture hall after Dr. Bannister. In the lecture hall, the famous stopwatch used to time Bannister's mile is on display. In July of 2012, Bannister was honored to be elected as one of the Olympic torchbearers. He carried the flame into the Oxford track stadium that was named for him. Of his neurology career and his track achievements, as the greatest runner ever, Bannister claims that working hard is the secret to his success.
10
What can be inferred by referring to the timeline?
A.
Bannister was more well known as a neurologist than as a track and field star.
B.
Bannister did not value his time as a runner and never participated in sports again.
C.
Despite retiring from track and field at a young age, Bannister was still involved with sports throughout his life.
D.
After retiring from track and field at a young age, Bannister continued to run.
I think the answer is C cuz it just makes the most sense off of the article. Hope this helps!
why did emphasis on gender roles re-emerged after World War II?
Answer:
cause they said women cant fight in war, and they had to stay home with kids (not sure if this is right sorry)
Explanation:
Answer:
during the war- With men away to serve in the military and demands for war material increasing, manufacturing jobs opened up to women and upped their earning power. Yet women's employment was only encouraged as long as the war was on. Once the war was over, federal and civilian policies replaced women workers with men.
Explanation:
after the war- the war changed the lives of tons of women and men in many ways. for exmaple, Wartime needs increased labor demands for female workers, more men died, so more women becamed widowed, and sometimes got to keep husbands property. this soon heightened domestic hardships and responsibilities, and intensified pressures for Americans to conform to social and cultural norms.
Which of the following describes a sharing of power between a national government and its subdivisions (states)?
Answer:
federalism
Explanation:
ability to split the power with 2 gov divisions