Answer:
by seeking the place gdp
Answer:
by watching the grey lists
I'm doing an essay but I need help with the conclusion
It's about Was Cortes justified in conquering the Aztec Empire?
Answer:
Sorry but I Didn't Understand
Answer:
thanks for five Points.....
the source of carbon to plants in the carbon cycle is
What was the major reason for people leaving Europe and coming to America? Its a test about the 13 colonies
Answer:
One major reason was that people felt their religion was not accepted.
Explanation:
Many of the people who left Europe and came to America did not follow the Church of England. They wanted to be able to follow their own religion instead of all following the Church of England.
HELP ASAP ILL MAKE BRAINIEST!!!!
All were reasons for a decline in the support of prohibition by the late 1920s, except
options:
Prohibition was difficult to enforce.
There was an increase in the illegal production and sale of liquor.
There was a rise in gang violence and other crimes.
There was a 30% drop in alcohol consumption in the U.S.
Answer:
D - There was a 30% drop in alcohol consumption in the U.S
Select all that apply.
Three steps leading to American involvement in Vietnam included:
commitment of support by Eisenhower
the Gulf of Tonkin resolution
military advisors sent by Kennedy
American aid to the Vietcong
Answer:
the Gulf of Tonkin resolution
military advisors sent by Kennedy
commitment of support by Eisenhower
Explanation:
CAN SOMEONE WHO IS REALLY GOOD AT HISTORY HELP ME PLEASE
Answer:
Patriarchy.
Explanation: Remember, the men took the brunt of the war, and women stayed behind. It's going to be patriarchy because they're currently following tradition.
What are the challenges we face today to uphold the rule of law? What about in the future?
Answer:
Anyone who holds that what matters most in politics is having the right people in power and not how power should be constrained will be unconvinced of the value of the rule of law. Neither will anyone who believes that institutions of public power are merely instruments of the ruling class that need to be dismantled rather than merely constrained. For the majority of modern democratic societies, however, the rule of law’s requirement that both rulers and the ruled be accountable to the law is of unquestionable value. To be sure, in the modern world, it is the liberal tradition that values the rule of law most highly. Liberals who are concerned with ways of protecting (and realizing) liberty in some form and averting threats to it view the rule of law as an overarching source of security. Nonetheless, there is substantial disagreement even among liberals over what exactly counts as a faithful application of the term and, even when that is pinned down, how it is to be accomplished.
In itself, the notion of the rule of law is not a faithful description of any state of affairs but a complex ideal that is even more complex to realize. Thus, there is reason to be skeptical about whether societies necessarily benefit from all that might be invoked under the term. The independence of the judiciary, for instance, is clearly a problem if the independence is misused to foster the sectoral privileges of judicial personnel or to allow unchallenged interpretations of the law. Heavy emphasis on the formal aspects of the rule of law—for example, on procedural justice—may distract from the content and consequences of those laws. Critics of a strictly formal conception of the rule of law argue that too much attention to legal process generates significant vices of its own in the form of exaggerated legalism and neglect of the political or real-world dimensions of legal conflicts. Excessive veneration of the law and legal procedures may be too costly if it inhibits independent social assessments of the merits of a given policy proposal or if the official mandate of “blindness” gives legitimacy to actions performed “according to the law” even when most people would oppose such acts. Some writers have charged, moreover, that the increasing domain of judges and lawyers—indeed, their encroachment into areas previously left to politicians and the electorate—entails the loss of much that is politically and democratically valuable.
In short, too much emphasis on procedures for preventing arbitrariness can lead to subverting the doing of justice according to what might otherwise find support in the rule of law, and the legal strictures then become themselves a form of arbitrariness that is no more legitimate. On the other hand, those who defend the negative value of the rule of law object to more substantive understandings of the ideal on the grounds that morally ambitious aspirations about the rule of law threaten to purge the concept of its specificity and usefulness. They argue that to open the concept to a whole host of extralegal considerations about substantive justice and wider societal goals is to conflate ideas about “the rule of law” with notions about “the rule of good law,” such that any distinction between the two is reduced to nothing. As a consequence, no discussion of the rule of law can be complete without some philosophical reflection on law, including on its purpose and meaning.
How was Mexico's struggle for independence similar to and different from the founding of the United States?
Answer:
Mexico was first populated more than 13000 years ago before the Spanish conquered and colonized the country in the 16th century.
5) How did the introduction of these new practices most benefit U.S. business?
A) By increasing production efficiency
B) By preventing shortages of goods
By increasing protective tariffs
D) By decreasing exports
Answer:
By increasing production efficiency
I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST THE FIRST TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION☺️
Answer:
which language is this ???
What is the basic premise of an opportunity cost?
A) When the demand for a product or service increases, the cost of that product
or service also increases
B) People are more likely to spend their money when there are many opportunities
to do so.
C) When you buy something, you are foregoing all the other things you could have
bought instead.
D) A form of currency is needed to allow people in unrelated businesses to
exchange services.
Which is an example of a positive incentive for consumers?
a sales tax imposed by a state
a steady rise in profits over a year
a coupon clipped from a newspaper
an increase in price for a popular product
A positive incentive for consumers from the above is a coupon clipped from a newspaper.
Why is this a positive incentive?Positive incentives to consumers are factors that will make the consumer more likely to buy something or consume a good.
When a coupon is attached to a newspaper, this encourages the consumer to use the coupon to get a good and consume more of it.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on consumer incentives at https://brainly.com/question/16880505.
Answer:
C. a coupon clipped from a newspaper
Explanation:
Which of the following helped Hernán Cortés conquer the Aztec empire?
O A. The Spanish had a much larger army
OB. The Aztecs were in the middle of a civil war.
0 C. The Spanish made alliances with Aztec enemies.
O
D. The Spanish seized Tenochtitlan immediately upon arriving in the Americas.
Answer:
the C, it suits better I guess
Hoover or Roosevelt?
Answer:
Hoover Roosevelt
Hoover Hoover
Roosevelt Hoover
Roosevelt Roosevelt
Roosevelt Roosevelt
Explanation:
Which leader did not promote the new nationalism of the "American System"?
Daniel Webster
John C. Calhoun
Henry Clay
George Washington
Answer:
George Washingmachine
Explanation:
i took the quiz :/
The leader that do not promote the new nationalism of the "American System" was George Washington. Thus, option forth is correct.
What is the meaning of nationalism?Nationalism is a philosophy that prioritizes allegiance, loyalty, or patriotism to a nation or nation-state over other person or group concerns.
The American System was an economic strategy introduced in the first part of the nineteenth century which was based on Alexander Hamilton's "American School" concepts that played a significant role in American politics throughout the America.
The plan was to unify the nation, which was supported by various leaders such as Daniel Webster, John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay etc.
George Washington was the leader who did not support the new nationalism of the "American System." Therefore, it can be concluded that option forth is correct.
Learn more bout nationalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/1018147
#SPJ2
The bill of rights amendments 1-10
Answer:
1. Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.
2. Right to keep and bear arms in order to maintain a well regulated militia.
3. No quartering of soldiers.
4. Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.
5. Right to due process of law, freedom from self-incrimination, double jeopardy.
6. Rights of accused persons, e.g., right to a speedy and public trial.
7. Right of trial by jury in civil cases.
8. Freedom from excessive bail, cruel and unusual punishments.
9. Other rights of the people.
10. Powers reserved to the states.
Explanation:
Describe one way Jefferson's policies represented a continuation of the previous presidents' policies. the policies of Jefferson .
One way that Jefferson's policies showed a continuation of the previous president's policies was on the area of the neutrality of the United States during the wars in Europe.
The United States took a neutrality stand from the time when the president was George Washington.
The neutrality policy was done to show America's stand concerning the raging war that had taken over Europe.
As president, Jefferson passed the embargo Act. This act banned the ships from Britain from all of the ports of the US. He also banned all trades from Europe.
This was done in order for the Europeans to respect the neutrality stand of the United States.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/14556587?referrer=searchResults
2. What role did slavery play in establishing racism in America?
Answer: The history of the Electoral College is receiving a lot of attention. Pieces like this one, which explores “the electoral college and its racist roots,” remind us how deeply race is woven into the very fabric of our government. A deeper examination, however, reveals an important distinction between the political interests of slaveholders and the broader category of the thing we call “race.”
“Race” was indeed a critical factor in the establishment of the Constitution. At the time of the founding, slavery was legal in every state in the Union. People of African descent were as important in building northern cities such as New York as they were in producing the cash crops on which the southern economy depended. So we should make no mistake about the pervasive role of race in the conflicts and compromises that went into the drafting of the Constitution.
Yet, the political conflicts surrounding race at the time of the founding had little to do with debating African-descended peoples’ claim to humanity, let alone equality. It is true that many of the Founders worried about the persistence of slavery in a nation supposedly dedicated to universal human liberty. After all, it was difficult to argue that natural rights justified treason against a king without acknowledging slaves’ even stronger claim to freedom. Thomas Jefferson himself famously worried that in the event of slave rebellion, a just deity would side with the enslaved.
Explanation:
1. What is the "necessary and proper" clause?
Answer:
The Necessary and Proper Clause allows Congress "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the [enumerated] Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
Explanation:
Answer → To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the [enumerated] Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States
During a school fundraiser, the fifth-grade classes sold rolls of wrapping paper. The table shows how many rolls each class sold. The rolls sold in packages of 4. How many packages of wrapping paper did Ms. Lane's class sell
A 2,688
B 173
C 168
D 143
Answer:
C. 168
Explanation:
Just divide 672 by 4
which is 168
Hope this helps!
Answer: C: 168
Explanation: Each roll is sold in groups of 4, and the total rolls sold for Ms. Lane's class is 672. 672÷4=168 total packages sold.
Look up and record the
definition of mudflat
Answer: a stretch of muddy land left uncovered at low tide.
Explanation:
ASAP ILL GIVE U BRAINIEST!!!!!
The United States prospered after World War I. All were reasons for American prosperity, except:
options:
Foreign governments and individuals owed the United States billions of dollars after the war.
A decrease in productivity leading to longer work hours for workers.
The United States had been spared the physical ruin of World War I
Innovation in industrialization and technology
Answer:
I believe it is "A decrease in productivity leading to longer work hours for workers."
Explanation:
This is likely the answer because the United States was for the most part spared the physical ruin of the war, there were innovations in technology, and they were owed a lot of money by foreign governments.
The————— enacted in 1990, has recognized the equal rights people with disabilities to employment,
transportation, and access to public education.
Explanation:
Disabilities Act of 1990
Did you research aspects of both command and mixed-market economies?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Which of the following BEST explains the growing popularity of the Ku Klux Klan throughout the South in the 1860s and 1870s? A The organization capitalized on Southerners' fear of the changes that occurred after the Civil War. B The organization established the first public high schools and universities in many Southern states. C The organization built many large factories and helped the South became a major manufacturing center. D The organization was the dominant political party in the South and helped influence federal policy.
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
The Klan capilized on the fears of blacks having equal rights to whites and the ability to vote in the elections.
Who lost his Savannah homes to the
British during the Revolutionary War?
A. gwinnett
b. hall
c.walton
Answer:
B hall......................
Hall lost his Savannah homes to the British during the Revolutionary War Option(b) is correct. The Loyalists were the conspicuous victors in the Transformation; they acquired freedom, the option to rehearse delegate government.
What is a Revolutionary War?Battle of public freedom, clashes battled by ethnicities to acquire autonomy. Defiance, a refusal of submission or request.
The English conflict exertion in the long run hit a wall and came to a standstill at Yorktown. On October 19, 1781, Cornwallis gave his battered armed force over to the Americans the English systems had fizzled.
Somewhere in the range of 25,000 and 70,000 American Nationalists kicked the bucket during dynamic military assistance. Of these, roughly 6,800 were killed in fight, while something like 17,000 kicked the bucket from illness. Most of the last kicked the bucket while detainees of battle of the English, for the most part in the jail ships in New York Harbor.
After French help assisted the Mainland Armed force with compelling the English acquiescence at Yorktown, in 1781, the Americans had successfully won their autonomy, however battling wouldn't officially end until 1783.
Therefore Option(b) is correct.
Learn more about Revolutionary War here:
brainly.com/question/1466912
#SPJ2
Which American policy does the Trail of Tears represent? A the restriction of immigrants from Asia following the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 B the opening of western frontier lands for settlers following the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 C the forced relocation of American Indians to reservations following the passage of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 D the building of railroads on land previously held by American Indians following the passage of the Pacific Railway Acts of the 1860s
Answer:
C, the forced relocation of American Indians to reservations following the passage of the Indian Removal Act of 1830.
Drag and drop the tiles to match the topics to the Supreme Court cases.
limits freedom
of speechsupports antitrust
regulationprotects workers
rights
IF YOU DONT KNOW THE ANSWERS DONT COMMENT SIMPLE AS THAT. IF U DO I WILL REPORT U
Answer:
In Lochner v. New York (1905) = protecting workers rights
In Schenck v. United States (1919) =limits freedom of speech
In Northern = supports antitrust
Explanation:
In Northern = Supports antitrust,
In Schenck v. United States (1919) =Limits freedom of speech,
In Lochner v. New York (1905) = Protecting workers rights.
What is Antitrust?Antitrust means preventing or controlling trusts or other monopolies, and so promoting fair competition in business.
What is Freedom of speech?Freedom of speech in general terms means right to speak freely.
What is Protecting?Preserve or guarantee by means of formal or legal measures.
To learn more about Schenck v. United States (1919)
https://brainly.com/question/9498281
#SPJ2
What was the cause of the Norman invasion of Britain?
Pope Alexander II ordered the Normans to invade.
There was no clear heir to the English throne.
The Norman church wanted to gain more followers.
The king of England was attempting to end corruption.
Answer:
The Norman conquest of England was a military invasion of England by William the Conqueror in 1066. ... He invaded England after the death of King Edward the Confessor because he believed he had the most right to be King of England, but King Harold II had himself crowned king instead.
So I believe the answer would be B? I hope it's right, if not I'm sorry
Explanation:
Hope this helps:)
~Kisame'sAbs
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Norman conquest of England was a military invasion of England by William the Conqueror in 1066. ... He invaded England after the death of King Edward the Confessor because he believed he had the most right to be King of England, but King Harold II had himself crowned king instead.
The eyes of the owl and rabbit shown in the diagram each provide a different advantage.
Answer:
(Read Explanation)
Explanation:
The front-facing owl eyes allow the bird to accurately judge distance when swooping in on prey. The side-facing rabbit eyes allow the animal to detect the motion of possible predators.
The specialized eye types of these animals are examples of:
(a) disruptions of the natural balance
(b) the interdependence of living things
(c) adaptations for survival under certain conditions
(d) involuntary responses to stimuli
When swooping in on prey, the owl can properly measure distance because of its front-facing eyes. The animal can sense the movement of potential predators thanks to its side-facing rabbit eyes.
What is the distance?Distance is a numerical or qualitative measurement of the distance between two objects or places. The distance can refer to a physical length or an estimate based on other criteria in physics or common usage (e.g., “two counties over”). Because spatial cognition is a rich source of conceptual analogies in human thought.
These species' unique eye kinds include, for instance:
(a) Changes to the natural order
(b) The interconnectedness of all life.
(c) modifications for survival in specific environments
(d) uncontrollable reactions to stimuli
Therefore, Distance because of its front-facing eyes.
Learn more about distance here:
https://brainly.com/question/15172156
#SPJ2