A case has reached the Supreme Court, but not as a matter of appeal. How did it most likely get there
Answer:
Invoking original jurisdiction is the only nonappeal way in which cases can reach the Court.
Explanation:
.....
how many supreme court justices are usually needed to decide a case
Answer:
usually nine, but that differs depending on how many justices are seated, the vote is decided by the majority.
Explanation:
However, the constitution does not specify the number of justices needed to preside over a case. The number is determined by congress, before 1869 there were as few as 6, but since then there has been 9.
The executive branch, headed by the (fill in blank)
includes numerous executive departments that carry out or enforce laws passed by (fill in blank).
The executive branch is headed by the president. They enforce laws passed by Congress.
The president is in control of things like the army and is in control of enforcing laws passed by congress.
I hope this helps! :)
I have been passing classes because of this
Answer:brainly
Explanation: we are s.t.u.p.i.d
one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws
Answer:
One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.
Martin Luther King Jr. said that.
"to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other power vested by this constitution. " alexander hamilton used the clause above to.
The clause was used by Alexander Hamilton in order to convince the federal government to create the First Bank of the United States.
Alexander Hamilton was an American statesman and was also one of the founding fathers. He was influential and was a promoter of the United States constitution.
One of the vital clauses in the Constitution was "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers". This law was used by Alexander Hamilton when he wanted the first bank to be created.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25685887
The Second Amendment is an important part of the Constitution. For this assignment you will need to read the Second Amendment and the secondary source Know Your Rights: A Guide to the United States Constitution to help you answer the following prompt:
“Does the text of the Second Amendment mean that the right to 'bear arms' is unlimited?”
As you prepare to answer this prompt you should follow the format provided below.
Paragraph 1 - Analyze the text of the Second Amendment for yourselves. In order to analyze you should look at each word in the amendment and decide how each part of the amendment relates to the prompt.
Paragraph 2 - Summarize and cite the ideas and information from the secondary sources to provide support for your conclusion in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 3 – Summarize and cite the ideas and information in the secondary sources that go against your conclusions in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 4 – Write an analysis about the strength of the arguments that support or counter their own opinions. You will need to provide an explanation of your thinking about which opinions are stronger by citing specific textual evidence out of the primary and secondary sources.
Answer:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 07–290. Argued March 18, 2008—Decided June 26, 2008
District of Columbia law bans handgun possession by making it a crime
to carry an unregistered firearm and prohibiting the registration of
handguns; provides separately that no person may carry an unlicensed handgun, but authorizes the police chief to issue 1-year licenses; and requires residents to keep lawfully owned firearms
unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device. Respondent Heller, a D. C. special policeman, applied to register a handgun he wished to keep at home, but the District refused.
He filed this suit seeking, on Second Amendment grounds, to enjoin
the city from enforcing the bar on handgun registration, the licensing
requirement insofar as it prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in
the home, and the trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the
use of functional firearms in the home. The District Court dismissed
the suit, but the D. C. Circuit reversed, holding that the Second
Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess firearms and
that the city’s total ban on handguns, as well as its requirement that
firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional even when necessary for
Explanation:
what is one of the purposes of hunting laws and regulations
A person seeking to overturn a decision by a state's highest court by taking the case to the lowest level of the federal court system would begin at which court
Answer:
Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts.
Explanation:
What amendment allowed women to vote.
Answer:
Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Explanation:
WHAT IS UNDERCOVER ASSIGNMENT
Answer:
In policing/law, undercover operations/assignments involve investigators infiltrating criminal networks or posing as offenders in order to reveal organized crime activity. These operations take place in a variety of nations, with varying levels of oversight. In short, undercover operations entail secrecy.
ANSWER PLS
Question 11
Education
1 pts
A common criticism of the Supreme Court regarding its
willingness to strike down laws made by elected officials,
as well as to overturn past precedents, is known as:
Center
ing
O Original intent
Eker
O Judicial activism
O Judicial prudence
O Judicial restraint
Answer:
it's B I think I don't know man I'm just a kid and life is a nightmare
Standard probation conditions are applied
in cases involving juveniles
in all cases
is cases of minor crimes
in severe cases
Standard probation conditions are applied in cases that involve Juvenile. So, option A is correct. Standard Probation conditions are applied in cases involving Juveniles.
Though Juvenile probation is a more suitable option than out-of-home placement, a probation sentence still restricts the liberty of a juvenile offender. Juvenile probation programs are ideally established to assist young individuals in correcting their behaviors without removing them from their gatherings.
Juvenile probation is a form of community supervision that may include reporting to a supervisory officer, participation in behavior-modification programming, paying restitution to the victim, testing for drug use, or other conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions may result in a probation violation, which may lead to additional terms, incarceration, or other sanctions or incentives to improve behavior.
Learn more about Juvenile probation:
brainly.com/question/15135398
#SPJ1
Answer:
In all cases
Explanation:
This is because they are the common barriers and rules
As the Chief Executive of the United States, which one of the following roles is not included in that role?
a. Oversees cabinet, independent agencies, and regulatory commissions
b. Gives Executive Orders
c. Grants commutations, amnesty, and pardons
d. Makes appointments to federal positions
Answer:
The answer is
→ Option C.) Grants commutations, amnesty, and pardons.
Explanation:
Let's go over the answer choices! :^)
Option A.): Oversees cabinet, independent agencies, and regulatory commissions.
The Chief Executive/President of the United States has the role to oversee the cabinet, independent agencies, and so on. Therefore, this role is part of the President's job. This option is incorrect.Option B.): Gives Executive Orders.
The Chief Executive/President has the option to give executive orders. Obviously, look at the name. Chief Executive. Therefore, this role is part of the President's job. This option is incorrect.Option C.): Grants commutations, amnesty, and pardons.
The Chief Executive/President cannot grant commutations, amnesty, nor pardon. This is NOT part of the President's job. Therefore, this is NOT part of the President's job. This option is correct.Option D.): Makes appointments to federal positions
The Chief Executive/President has the option to make appointments to federal positions. This is also part of the President's job. Therefore, this option is incorrect.Hope this helped! :^)
the establishment clause of the first amendment has often been interpreted to mean
Answer:
freedom of religion, expression, assembly, press and right to petition the government.
Explanation:
A FIRETWUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
when does the supreme court have original jurisdiction over a case?
research methods in criminal justice and criminology
Answer:Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology connects key concepts to real field research and practices using contemporary examples and recurring ...
Explanation: Research methods in criminal justice and criminology / Callie M. ... research methods, especially as they pertain to criminology and the criminal.
983 pages
A challenge to the array is used by judges to bar real evidence from the criminal trial. True or False
Answer:
false
Explanation:
what is law? what is the main function of law
Answer:
Law set up rules and regulations for society so that we can freedom, gives Justice to those who were wronged, and it set up that it protects us from our own Government
Answer:
Law set up rules and regulations for society so that we can freedom, gives Justice to those who were wronged, and it set up that it protects us from our own Government
Explanation:
Guy above me is right! Thanks guy who answerd before me! :D
Alma Tirtsche (1921)
Alma Tirtsche's beaten body was found wrapped in a blanket in what is known as Gun
Alley in Melbourne, Australia. Because the body was relatively free of blood, the police
deduced that she had been murdered elsewhere and brought to the alley. Ger body had
been washed before being wrapped in the blanket. A local bar owner, Colin Ross, was
questioned. Ross admitted seeing Tirtsche in his bar earlier in the day.
Investigators collected blankets from Ross's home and found several strands of long,
reddish blonde hair on them. The length of the hair implied it had come from a female,
and the concentration of pigment in the hair implied a younger woman. Some of the
ends of the hair were irregular, implying the hair had been forcibly broken off. The
physical similarity of the hair found on the blanket with that of Alma Tirtschke convinced
the jury that Ross was the murderer. This was the first time that hair was used to secure
a conviction in Australia. Unfortunately, analysis of the hairs 75 years later showed that
two of the strands found on the blankets came from different individuals, which throws
doubt on Ross's guilt.
3. What other characteristics of the hair could the investigators have examined
(besides the length and color) to determine if they had come from the same
person, and that that person was Tirtsche?
The other characteristics of the hair that could be examined are genetic analysis of Alma Tirtsche's hair and the strands.
Who is Alma Tirtsche?The Gun Alley Murder occurred in Melbourne, Australia, in 1921 when 12-year-old Alma Tirtschke was raped and killed. Due to the fact that she went to Hawthorn West High School and was last seen alive near a bar, the Australian Wine Saloon, her murder generated a lot of media attention.
The case has gained notoriety more subsequently for being a miscarriage of justice. Colin Campbell Ross, then 29 years old, was found guilty of killing Tirtschke and put to death, but he maintained his innocence all the way to the end. Ross's innocence was established by DNA evidence when the case was reexamined decades later, and he was given a posthumous pardon in 2008. Since Ross's arrest, Tirtschke's family has maintained that Ross is innocent and that the proper person was found guilty of killing Tirtschke.
To learn more about genetic analysis visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28265289
#SPJ9
What is a Bureaucracy?
a. The Constitution and the three branches of government
b. All of the agencies, people, and procedures that make the government operate
c. The Senate and House
d. The President and his advisors
Answer:
Letter A
Explanation:
#Carry me on learning
What is advanced gastric cancer?
Answer:
A cancer that begins in the stomach and has spread to at least one other part of the body, such as the liver or lungs.
Explanation:
Which law or act requires inmates to exhaust all internal administrative grievance procedures before they can file a civil rights case in federal court
which rule of the federal rules of civil procedures requires expert witnesses to submit written reports
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)
If a grand jury issues an indictment against a defendant, the defendant then appears in court to answer the indictment in a proceeding called the _____.
Answer:
Answer:
safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v
Explanation:
The sum of the forces on either side is the same, the only difference is the radius of curvature and speed.
Also given that r_1= smaller radius
r_2= larger radius curve
r_2= 2r_1..............i
let u be the speed of larger radius curve
now, \sum F = \frac{mv^2}{r_1} =\frac{mu^2}{r_2}∑F=
r
1
mv
2
=
r
2
mu
2
................ii
form i and ii we can write
v^2= \frac{1}{2} u^2v
2
=
2
1
u
2
⇒u= √2 v
therefore, safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v
If a grand jury issues an indictment against a defendant, the defendant then appears in court to answer the indictment in a proceeding called the Arraignment .
What Is an Arraignment?
Arraignment is a court proceeding in which the defendant is read the charges in the indictment, and is asked to enter a plea. The arraignment occurs after the defendant is arrested and formal charges are levied.
Arraignment is a formal reading of a criminal charging document in the presence of the defendant, to inform them of the charges against them. In response to arraignment, the accused is expected to enter a plea. Acceptable pleas vary among jurisdictions, but they generally include "guilty", "not guilty", and the peremptory pleas, or pleas in bar, setting out reasons why a trial cannot proceed. Pleas of nolo contendere ("no contest") and the Alford plea are allowed in some circumstances.
Learn more about Arraignment on:
brainly.com/question/14919926
#SPJ2
freedom of speech is protected under an amendment to what governing document?
Answer:
In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws.
The First Amendment to the US Constitution, as well as numerous state constitutions and state and federal statutes, substantially guarantee freedom of speech and expression in the United States from government restraints.
What is Freedom of Speech?Freedom of speech is a notion that supports an individual's or a community's right to express their beliefs and ideas without the fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal repercussions.
The United Nations has recognized the right to freedom of expression as a basic dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international humanitarian law. Many nations have constitutional amendments that safeguard free expression. In political debate, terms like free expression, freedom of speech, and liberty of speech are used interchangeably.
However, in a legal sense, freedom of expression encompasses any activity involving the seeking, receiving, and transmitting of information or ideas, independent of the media employed.
Learn more about freedom of speech, from:
brainly.com/question/17841333
#SPJ2
in a court opinion this term is used to describe the courts answer to the issue it was asked to dcide
Answer:
a judicial opinion :)
Explanation:
In 1857, the supreme court ruled in the dred scott decision that:
Answer:
The Court decided Dred Scott in 1817 at a time when political tensions about slavery ran high. In that case, the Supreme Court held that no African-American could be a citizen entitled to sue in federal court and that no African-American could become free simply because he was taken into a free state by his owner.
Explanation:
Answer: Slaves had no rights and that they were considered property.
What is the most common form of direct democracy?.
Answer:
A delegation of power from the federal government to state governments, increasing state and local sovereignty
Explanation: