I will mark branliest
Who was the last ruler of ancient Egypt?
A.
Hatshepsut
B.
Alexander
C.
Cleopatra VII
D.
Cambyses
E.
Nefertiti
Answer:
Cleopatra VII Philopator
Explanation:
PLZ HELP, THIS IS A DUE TEST!!
How can a war be beneficial to a nation's economy?
(A.) The military increases the amount of materials, supplies, and goods it purchases from businesses, leading to economic growth.
(B.) A strong military is linked with a strong economy, so the nation will typically win any conflict it is involved in.
(C.) As a wartime economy is put into place, more natural resources are accessed, and a greater variety of goods is produced.
(D.) As production increases during wartime, there are more goods for citizens to purchase with wages they earn.
Answer:
the answer is B
Explanation:
Answer:
a i believe, because when a city gets overthrown, you can take their belonging
Explanation:
What is the difference between criminal law and military law?
ill give brainliest
3. Do you believe in the ideas and principles of the Declaration of Independence? If yes, which ones? If no, why not?
4. How can the Declaration of Independence impact future generations?
5. Predict: Which specific groups of people can benefit from the writings of the Declaration of Independence today?
Answer:
yes i do
Explanation:
How did the Pan-African movement influence independence in Africa?
A) Africans united as a single group instead of many different tribes
B) European countries imported more grain into Africa
C) It caused colonialism to continue until 1990
D) The Pan-African movement began in Europe and did not affect independence
What is a characteristic that pulled the Greek city-states together?
poetry of Homer
food growth and preparation
national anthem
Help please This is a final
Answer: Salt Water
Explanation:
Good luck!
Answer:
Salt water
Explanation:
hope your final goes well!
How can young people of today help fulfill Dr. Martin Luther King's dream for America?
Answer:
People can address and speak out about their own issues.
Explanation:
In 2-3 sentences, summarize the result of the Treaty of Versailles.
Answer: Treaty of Versailles, peace document signed at the end of World War I by the Allied and associated powers and by Germany in the Hall of Mirrors in the Palace of Versailles, France, on June 28, 1919; it took force on January 10, 1920.
Explanation:
Who were colonists that quickly assembled in response to the presence of British troops ?
Privateers
Redcoats
Loyalists
Minutemen
What was significant about the court case Marbury v. Madison?
Answer:
In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution. Although the immediate effect of the decision was to deny power to the Court, its long-run effect has been to increase the Court’s power by establishing the rule that ‘it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.’ Since Marbury v. Madison the Supreme Court has been the final arbiter of the constitutionality of congressional legislation.
Explanation:
What could a person do if they felt their trial was unfair to get their sentence reverse or lightened?
A.
Go before the Vizier
B
Go before the Nomarch
Explanation:
B. Go before the Nomarch
PLEASE HELP IM TIMED p.s its ok if you only answer the ones you know and skip the ones you dont know.
1.
What is “habeas corpus”?
A. the principle that a person’s property cannot be taken by the government without legislative approval
B. a written list of freedoms that a government promises to protect
C. the principle that a person cannot be imprisoned without being charged for a specific crime
D. the idea that no monarch or other government leader can levy taxes without legislative approval
2.
Which were the upper class of colonial society?
A. small planters, independent farmers, and artisans
B. indentured servants
C. the gentry
D. free African Americans
3.
In colonial times, how did a young man often learn a trade?
A. by becoming an apprentice
B. by going to school
C. by becoming an indentured servant
D. by buying his own business
4.
Which is true of women’s roles in colonial towns?
A. Women usually supervised children and slave’s household chores.
B. Women participated in public life, holding office and voting throughout the colonies.
C. Women’s duties were strictly limited to running a household, making clothing, and preparing meals.
D. Women sometimes kept shop or an inn, or worked in various trades.
5.
Why were jobs in public office held only by the gentry?
A. Candidates had to pay to hold office.
B. Many official jobs were voluntary positions.
C. Office holders had to pass educational tests.
D. Campaigning for elections was very expensive.
Answer: for #3 the answer is
A
Explanation:
Why did Milgram’s experiment become so famous?
Answer:
Explanation:
Milgram's experiment became famous because it showed us that contrary to expectations, most people will obey an order given by an authority figure to harm someone, even if they feel that it's wrong, and even if they want to stop.
HELP ASAP all uk is pic
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
c
Which of these section titles shows that Jacksonianism helped white men?
A"Property owners were the only ones who could vote"
B"Slavery becomes a bigger issue"
C"Jackson loses, but then his support grows"
D"Social changes spark a movement in the early 1800s"
Answer: A
Explanation:
Giving brainliest for first right answer
Answer:
Pyramids of Giza
Explanation:
Answer:
Pyramids at Giza
Explanation:
The first way you can tell is that it's furthest to the left on the timeline. The second way you can tell is by looking at the dates. If you use the second method, remember that BCE dates go backwards, so the bigger the number, the further back it was.
I need help in the First Amendment
you should be able to talk about freedom of religion because we have a right to do anything that our heart tell us to and also it is good for for people to be religious. People might be scared bc to talk about it bc they dont know god and if other people know him so it might be embracing that they dont know him. there is nothing scary about talking about religion it is already safe to talk about it.
HOPE THIS HELPS I TRIED MY BEST
What was the issue in the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education?
voting rights
bus transportation
school segregation
employment opportunity
Answer:school segregation
Explanation: school segregation
Answer:
1954- court decision that declared state laws segregating schools to be unconstitutional. Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Linda Brown, 8 years old, lived 3 blocks from an all-white school, and had to walk 21 to hers. Oliver Brown tried to register hear at the white school, and this was 1 of 5 cases challenging segregation in schools; lawyer was Thurgood Marshall
Explanation:
but to answer you question the answer is C, or SCHOOL SEGREGATION
Robert is disgruntled with the current political party in Presidential office. He decides to publicly voice his opinions in the middle of the city square with a speech outlining the faults of the party, the mistakes of the President, and the overall decline of the administration. What right is being violated?
Answer:
The right being violated in this scenario is the freedom of expression or freedom of speech.
Explanation:
Robert's act of publicly voicing his opinions in the city square is an exercise of his right to freedom of speech, which is considered a fundamental human right in democratic societies. This right is enshrined in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects individuals from government censorship and allows them to express their opinions, ideas, and beliefs without fear of persecution or punishment.
Robert's speech is a form of political expression and criticism, which is protected by the First Amendment. He has the right to voice his opinions about the current political party and the President, as well as the administration's policies and actions.
However, while the First Amendment protects free speech, it is not an absolute right, and there are limitations to it. For instance, if Robert's speech poses an immediate and substantial danger or incites violence, it may not be protected by the First Amendment. Moreover, there are laws that protect individuals from defamation or slander, which are forms of speech that harm a person's reputation and can result in legal consequences.
In addition, the time, place, and manner of Robert's speech may also be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the city may require him to obtain a permit for the public demonstration, set limits on the size of the gathering, or designate a specific area for the protest. These regulations are intended to ensure public safety and prevent disruptions to the normal functioning of the city.
In conclusion, Robert's act of publicly criticizing the current political party and President is an exercise of his right to freedom of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment. However, this right is subject to limitations and regulations that balance the interests of free expression and public safety.
How can young people help fulfill Dr. Martin Luther King's dream for America?
Answer:
He wanted African-Americans to trust and work with white people, to be nonviolent, and to be persistent. ... King, then, wanted African Americans to fulfill his dream of racial equality through nonviolent protest that would preserve their own integrity and respect the humanity of those they opposed.
Explanation:
Answer:
Martin Luther King merged radical thinking, social we and oratory light. His speech I had a dream described a future of America that motivated millions of people to achieve racial equality. There was a mistake. King has been very successful in helping the African Americans to end their alienation and disenfranchisement.
Explanation:
plz help will mark brainliest if correct answer only
cause or effect of the great depression
Answer: Cause , Cause , Effect, Effect
Explanation:
3. Do you believe in the ideas and principles of the Declaration of Independence? If yes, which ones? If no, why not?
4. How can the Declaration of Independence impact future generations?
5. Predict: Which specific groups of people can benefit from the writings of the Declaration of Independence today?
Answer:
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
Answer:
Yes, the declaration of independence is a big thing
Explanation:
RIP to all that were lost last year if you feel comfortable to say so say a loved one who died last year
Answer: my great grand mother she died to cancer. She was 76. What messed me up the most was that me and my mother practically lived at her house the last year of her life.and the first year of my life was spent with her, but now I’m twelve almost thirteen
Explanation:
Think of this as a diary/journal entry about what happened at the US Capitol building yesterday. You can put anything you want in your "journal"...feelings, thoughts, questions, summary of events, opinions...unlimited possibilities.
I will give extra based on the amount of thought that went into the response. (Example: minimal writing, generic, non-specific, no personal thoughts/feelings will only get brainliest. Detailed, specific, thoughtful, full of personal opinions/thoughts/feelings/questions will get brainliest)
Answer:
Explanation:
So this is how it ends. The presidency of Donald John Trump, rooted from the beginning in anger, division and conspiracy-mongering, comes to a close with a violent mob storming the Capitol at the instigation of a defeated leader trying to hang onto power as if America were just another authoritarian nation.
The scenes in Washington would have once been unimaginable: A rampage through the citadel of American democracy. Police officers brandishing guns in an armed standoff to defend the House chamber. Tear gas deployed in the Rotunda. Lawmakers in hiding. Extremists standing in the vice president’s spot on the Senate dais and sitting at the desk of the speaker of the House.
The words used to describe it were equally alarming: Coup. Insurrection. Sedition. Suddenly the United States was being compared to a “banana republic” and receiving messages of concern from other capitals. “American carnage,” it turned out, was not what President Trump would stop, as he promised upon taking office, but what he wound up delivering four years later to the very building where he took the oath.
The convulsion in Washington capped 1,448 days of Twitter storms, provocations, race-baiting, busted norms, shock-jock governance and truth-bending from the Oval Office that have left the country more polarized than in generations. Those who warned of worst-case scenarios only to be dismissed as alarmists found some of their darkest fears realized. By day’s end, even some Republicans suggested removing Mr. Trump under the 25th Amendment rather than wait two weeks for the inauguration of President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.
The article continues:
While Washington has seen many protests over the years, including some that turned violent, the uprising on Wednesday was unlike anything that the capital has seen during a transition of power in modern times, literally interrupting the constitutional acceptance of Mr. Biden’s election victory. Mr. Trump all but egged them on during a “Save America March” on the Ellipse south of the White House just as Congress was convening to validate Mr. Biden’s election.
“We will never give up,” Mr. Trump had declared. “We will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved. Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore, and that’s what this is all about.”
It ends with this paragraph:
With Mr. Pence unwilling and unable to stop the count, the president’s supporters made it their mission to do it themselves. And for several hours, they succeeded. But after they were finally cleared out of the Capitol, lawmakers resumed the process of ending the Trump presidency, no matter how much he resists.
Answer:
the way i feel about the capital things happen is if i ere there i would fell terroriz and unconmterbal that people knew where i work and could easy to break in but way did they do it that way they could of march around the capital not break onto it they could of done some serious damage
Read the excerpt from "Egyptian Tombs: A Grave Matter.”
From the twenty-fifth century BCE, pharaohs’ tombs were located inside grand pyramids. The pyramids served as giant grave markers; however, they also served as treasure markers for grave robbers. These wicked people would strip the tombs bare of all valuables. Then they would sell the stolen items for a large amount of money. Stealing from the dead was bad enough, but for the ancient Egyptians, the act also threatened the pharaoh’s afterlife.
Based on the details in the excerpt, what conclusion can be drawn about the pharaohs of ancient Egypt?
They went to great lengths to ensure that their tombs were prepared for the afterlife by placing valuables inside.
They liked the pyramid shape, so they used it as a tomb.
They thought that giant grave markers would protect them against grave robbers.
They placed more emphasis on their current lives than on their afterlives.
Answer:
They went to great lengths to ensure that their tombs were prepared for the afterlife by placing valuables inside.
Explanation:
Would you have considered settling on the Texas frontier during this era? Why or why not? Give your opinion.
Answer:
The population of Texas continued to grow during the 1840s and 1850s. Settlers from the United States as well as Europe came to Texas in search of land and opportunity.
Explanation:
please help if you answer it i will give you brainliest
Answer:
Then people would literally be able to do whatever the want. The world will just be based on opinions and not rules/laws.
Explanation:
The War of 1812 and the American Revolutionary War both took place in American territory. What is another factor that these wars had in common? (5 points)
Group of answer choices
They were both about claiming territory
They were both about taxes and slavery.
They were both about American authority.
They were both about financial independence.
Which U.S. president said: “It is the day when we remind ourselves that man can and must live in peace with his neighbors and that it is the peacemakers?
single:(
Answer: John f kennedy
Explanation: