Joe marked up all the shoes in his store by 15%. If a pair of shoes originally cost $45, what was the price after the markup?

Answer:

the answer will be [-3/4,1/2]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

you're right!! its C

Step-by-step explanation:

For lines to be perpendicular, the multiplied slopes of the line need to be -1, so

y=1/3x-1

y=-3x-4

(1/3)*(-3)=-1

therefore, they are perpendicular

Answer:

2 miles.

Step-by-step explanation: Because 528 times 20 is 10560 then divide by 5280 equaling 2 miles.

Answer:

It might be 1,050. Also can't believe thats a college question-

It was very easy to solve! Help from an 8th grader here.

Step-by-step explanation:

The smallest four-digit number that is divisible by each of the four smallest prime numbers is 1050.

The divisibility rule states that " Divisible By, implies that when two numbers are divided, the result would be a whole number.

The four smallest prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, and 7.

To find the smallest four-digit number that is divisible by each of these numbers, we can start by finding the least common multiple (LCM) of these numbers. The LCM of a set of numbers is the smallest number that is divisible by all of the numbers in the set.

To find the LCM of 2, 3, 5, and 7, we can start by listing the prime factorization of each number:

2 = 2 x 1

3 = 3 x 1

5 = 5 x 1

7 = 7 x 1

Then, we can find the LCM by taking the highest power of each prime that appears in any of the numbers:

LCM(2, 3, 5, 7) = 2¹ x 3¹ x 5¹ x 7¹  = 210

Since we want the "smallest 4-digit number", then it is:

210 x 5 =1050

Therefore, each of the four lowest prime numbers may be divisible by the smallest four-digit number, which is 1050.

Learn more about the divisibility rule here:

brainly.com/question/10703980

#SPJ2

Answer: 75.1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

86.0*

Step-by-step explanation:

i am not 100% sure

Answer:

What is the question?? The question is not there

Answer:

129870 did not vote or voted for someone else.

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't know what your asking

Answer:

x=6

Step-by-step explanation:

5tgghjkli

Answer:

=-15

Step-by-step explanation:

3c

3(-5)

3×-5

=-15

Answer:

0.25

Step-by-step explanation:

3 white counters and 1 black counter,

3+1 = 4

the chances of you choosing the black counter is 1/4

1/4 can also be written as 0.25.

Answer:

The probability of choosing a black counter is 0.25.

Also the picture is attached for the mark on scale.

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability is the likeliness of occurrence of an event.

Given

There are three white and 1 black counter in the bag which means our sample space contains 3+1 = 4 elements

n(S) = 4

Let B be the event that the drawn out counter is black. As there is only one black counter

n(B) = 1

The probability of choosing a black counter is:

[tex]P(B) = \frac{n(B)}{n(S)}\\P(B) = \frac{1}{4} = 0.25[/tex]

Hence,

The probability of choosing a black counter is 0.25.

Also the picture is attached for the mark on scale.

Answer:

I think the answer is 5,000 .

Answer: 6.11

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Multiply the whole number by the denominator:

6 × 9 = 54

Step 2: Add the product you got in Step 1 to the numerator:

54 + 1 = 55

Step 3: Divide the sum from Step 2 by the denominator:

55 ÷ 9 = 6.111111

That's it folks! The answer to 6 1/9 in decimal form is displayed below:

6 1/9 ≈ 6.11

Answer b.

Hope this answer helps you

Answer: b 6 1/9 = 6.11

Step-by-step explanation: what I did first was figure out the decimal version of 1.9 which equaled to 0.11111 etc. then due to it having a zero in front of it, you just place the in that spot making the answer 6.1111111 :)

hope this helped!

Answer:

4 operations b/c thats how many is in the box

them you do addition using PEMDAS( perinthasis exponets multiplication division addition subtraction hope this is helpful

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: D

Step-by-step explanation:

Graph D shows the car increasing speed over time, then, the flat line shows the car remains at a constant speed. In order for the scenario to apply, there needs to be a line parallel to the x-axis which shows a speed remaining the same over a given amount of time. D is the only graph which has this feature, thus this graph displays the scenario.

Answer: If the a and b of your formula mean how many hours it takes each

person, like a = 2 and b = 1, then the formula gives 3/2 or 1 hour and

30 minutes.  This is not reasonable, since one of the painters alone

could do it in 1 hour.  

Actually, your formula is UPSIDE DOWN. It should be (a*b)/(a+b).

Here's why.  

Let h be the number of hours it takes for the two of them to do it

together. The first person could do it all in a hours, but can paint

only a fraction of the wall working h hours. Assuming a constant rate

of painting, that fraction is h/a. That is, the first painter will

paint h/a of the wall in h hours.  

Similarly, the second painter will paint h/b of the wall in that time.

So, when will they be done? When the whole wall is painted, which

happens whenever those 2 fractions add up to 1.  

You need to solve the following equation:

 (h/a) + (h/b) = 1  

     h*b + h*a = a*b           Multiplying through by a*b

       h*(b+a) = a*b           Factoring out h

             h = (a*b)/(a+b)   Dividing both sides by b+a

Okay, now say 3 painters could do it in a hours, b hours or c hours,

respectively. Let h be the number of hours they all must work to get

it all painted. The first painter finishes h/a of the wall in that

amount of time. The other 2 painters manage to paint h/b of the wall

and h/c of the wall in that time.  Since h is the time to finish the

job, all 3 of these fractions must add up to the whole wall, or 1.  

So you have the equation:

       h     h     h        

      --- + --- + ---  =  1

       a     b     c    

Solve this for h (start by multiplying through by a*b*c) and you will

get the generalized formula for 3 painters. It's not the formula you

wrote above but I think you can finish it off.

(I hope this helps. I'm sorry if it's wrong)

Answer: 579.36 km/h miles  to kilometers

  1296 meters to kilometers

Step-by-step explanation: couldnt  tell what you meant so both

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3.27*10^22

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the expression 9.6x10^85/3x10^63, we are to write it on scientific notation as shown:

9.6x10^85/3x10^63

= (9.8/3) * (10^85/10^63)

= (9.8/3)  * 10^{85-63}

= (9.8/3) *10^22

= 3.27 *10^22

Hence the expression in scientific notation is  3.27*10^22

Answer: 3,969

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply 140x28.35

Answer:

0.687

Step-by-step explanation:

step 1:  find mean of 6 data values (should be 11/6)

step 2:  find the difference of the mean and each of the six data values

step 3: square each of those six differences

step 4:  find the mean of the squared values (should be 102/216)

step 5:  take the square root of 102/216

Answer:

0.6

Step-by-step explanation:

i just took the test

An equation that represents the relationships between the time x and the distance y is y = 40x.

Equations whose variables have a power of one are called linear equations. One example with one variable is where ax+b = 0, where a and b are real values and x is the variable.

Given:

An eagle flies 40 miles per hour.

An equation that represents the relationships between the time x and the distance y:

Here, x and y are the variables.

So, the equation,

y = 40x.

Therefore, y = 40x is the required equation.

To learn more about the linear equation;

https://brainly.com/question/29739212

#SPJ5

Answer:

-20/3

Step-by-step explanation:

here x=5 and y=2 then put the value and get answer.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The paths crossed at when the height are equal i.e when f(x) = g(x)

Given

f(x)=−x^2+2x+4

g(x) = 2x

IF f(x) = g(x), then;

−x^2+2x+4 = 2x

−x^2+2x+4 - 2x = 0

−x^2+4 = 0

-x^2 = -4

x^2 = 4

x = ±√4

x = 2 and -2

Time cannot be negative

Hence x = 2

The path crossed after 2 seconds

Answer:

B. y-axis

A. f(x) = f(-x)

Answer:

I) √29

ii) 3√5

iii) 5√5

iv) √41

v) √5

vi) 6√2

Step-by-step explanation:

1)

Given complex numbers    -1+i and -3-4i

The points are ( -1 , 1) and (-3 , -4 )

Distance formula

[tex]\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1} )^{2} +(y_{2} -y_{1} )^2 }[/tex]

= [tex]\sqrt{(-4-(1) )^{2} +(-3 -(-1) )^2 } = \sqrt{25+4} =\sqrt{29}[/tex]

2)

Given complex numbers    1+i and 7-2i

The points are ( -3,4) and (-6,-1)

Distance formula

[tex]\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1} )^{2} +(y_{2} -y_{1} )^2 }[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{(-2-1 )^{2} +(7-1)^2 } = \sqrt{9+36} =\sqrt{45}= 3\sqrt{5}[/tex]

3)

Given complex numbers   -3 +4i and -6-i

The points are ( -3 ,4 ) and (-6 ,-1)

[tex]\sqrt{(-1-4 )^{2} +(-6-4)^2 } = \sqrt{25+100} =\sqrt{125}= 5\sqrt{5}[/tex]

4)

Given complex numbers are -2+3i and 2-2i

The points are ( -2 ,3) and (2 , -2)

[tex]\sqrt{(-2-3 )^{2} +(2+4)^2 } = \sqrt{25+36} =\sqrt{41}[/tex]



5)

Given complex numbers are 3 and 5+i

The points are( 3,0) and (5,1)

[tex]\sqrt{(1-0 )^{2} +(5-3)^2 } = \sqrt{1+4} =\sqrt{5}[/tex]



6)

Given complex numbers are -4+5i and 2-i

The points are ( -4 ,5) and ( 2,-1)

[tex]\sqrt{(-1-5 )^{2} +(2-(-4))^2 } = \sqrt{36+36} =\sqrt{72}= 6\sqrt{2}[/tex]



Answer:

Since the computed value of t= -4.654 does not fall in the critical region we therefore accept the null hypothesis . We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the means time served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

Step-by-step explanation:

Fraud                                        Firearm

15.2      9.2                              20.1          15.7

11.2       15.8                             20.4          9.8

7.2         5.2                             13.1           13.5

7.7         4.9                            20.7           23.1

7.4        9.8                            10.4            22.2            

∑ 93.6                                             169                    

Fraud  (X1i)²                                      Firearm(X2j)²

231.04      84.64                           404.01          246.49

125.44      249.64                          416.16          96.04

51.84        27.04                            171.61           182.25

59.29       24.01                            428.49           533.61

54.76        96.04                            108.16           492.84

∑1003.79                                                  3079.66          

We formulate the null and alternative hypothesis as

H0: μ1 - μ2 ≤ 0 i.e. the fraud meantime is less than that for firearms offenses.

Ha: μ1-  μ2  > 0  i.e. the fraud meantime is greater than that for firearms offenses.

We set the significance level at ∝= 0.01

The test statistic, if  H0 is true , is

t=  x1`1- x`2/ Sp√1/n1+ 1/n2

which has a student t- distribution with ν= n1+ n2 -2 = 18 degrees of freedom

The critical region consists of all t- values which are greater than or equal to  t> t(0.01)(18)= 2.522

Computations :

X1`= ∑X1i/n1 = 93.6/10= 9.36

X2`=∑X2j/n2=169/10 = 16.9

∑( X1i- x`1)² = ∑X1i²- (∑X1i)²/n1

= 1003.79 - 876.096/10

= 100.379- 87.6096

=12.7694

∑( X2j- x`2)² = ∑X2j²- (∑X2j)²/n2

= 3079.66 - 28561/10

= 3079.66- 2856.1

=223.56

Sp²= 12.7694+223.56/18= 13.129

Sp = √13.129 =3.623

t= 9.36-16.9/ 3.623√0.1+0.1

t= -7.54/ 1.62

t= -4.654

Conclusion: Since the computed value of t= -4.654 does not fall in the critical region we therefore accept the null hypothesis . We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the means time served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

The meantime served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

Answer:

50.27

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

122º

Step-by-step explanation:

The interior angles of a heptagon add to 900º. We can write an equation and solve:

Now that we know x, we can find the measure of ∠B: