Judge the following reasoning as true or false.
You are working for a tech company. You came up with an algorithm that performs a needed operation on n inputs in order of n operations. Someone else in the company simultaneously came up with an algorithm that performs the same task in order of log(n) operations. Then it follows necessarily that your algorithm will require more operations to perform this task and is therefore inferior and should not be used.
a) true
b) false

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

because all of the squares are shaded so it would be 1 whole

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

y=mx+b is the slope-intercept form. Y will remain the same. Since the slope is decreasing, use a negative. The y-intercept is -5, so substitute that for b.

Answer:

x=110

Step-by-step explanation:

-.5x+12.5=-x+18

add x to -x to move it

then add 1x to -.5x to get .5

soo.....

.5x+25.5=18

the subtract 12.5 from both sides to get

.5x=5.5

then divide .5 from both sides to get

x=110

Answer:

x = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(x+5, y-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Move right 5 units and moves down 2 units

Answer:

m = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the slope formula to find the slope  m .

Answer:

44percent

Step-by-step explanation:

in order to find the percent you just divide the numerator by the denomincator, hope this helps!

Answer:

2x-9

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=2x-5

to find f(x-2) we substitute x-2 in place of x

hence,f(x-2)=2(x-2)-5=2x-4-5

=2x-9

am i correct?

Answer:

5 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

50 pounds of dog food divided by 10 days = 5 pounds per day for 10 days.

Answer:

an equation of the second degree, meaning it contains at least one term that is squared.

Step-by-step explanation:

A quadratic equation contains at least one term that is squared. The standard form is ax² + bx + c = 0 with a, b, and c being constants, or numerical coefficients, and x is an unknown variable.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps! just remember the terms and it will get easier

-------×---------

-----------------m

Using proportions, it is found that the expression that can be used to find the number of inches in 6 feet is given by:

6 feet = 6 x 12 inches = 72 inches.

A proportion is a fraction of a total amount, and the measures are related using a rule of three.

In this problem, the rule of three is given as follows:

1 foot - 12 inches.

6 feet - x inches.

Applying cross multiplication:

6 feet = 6 x 12 inches = 72 inches.

More can be learned about proportions at https://brainly.com/question/24372153

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

Not p = ¬p

P or q = p ∨ q  

P and q = p ∧ q

If p then q = p → q

P if and only if q = p ↔ q

Existential quantification:  There exist an element x in the domain such that p(x).

Universal quantification: p(x) for all values of x in the domain.

(a)  No one has lost more than one thousand dollars playing the lottery.

Let A(x) means ‘x has lost more than one dollars playing the lottery’

It can also write as “there does not exists a person that lost more than one thousand dollars playing”

                     ¬Ǝ x A (x)

Negation of this statement:  

By using double negation law:

                               ¬ [¬Ǝ x A (x)]  ≡ Ǝ x A(x)

(b) There is a student in this class who has chatted with exactly one other student.

Let B(x,y) means “ x has chatted with y” and domain is all students of this class.

We can write the given sentence as:

“There is a student in the class who has chatted with one student and this student is not himself and for all people the student chatted with, this student has to be himself or the one student he chatted with”

Ǝ x Ǝ y[B ( x, y) ∧ x ≠ y ∧ ∀ z (B(x,y) → ( z = x v z = y))]

The negation:

               ¬ Ǝ x Ǝ y[B ( x, y) ∧ x ≠ y ∧ ∀ z (B(x ,y) → ( z = x v z = y))]

By using De Morgan’s law for quantifiers:

≡∀x ¬ Ǝ y [B ( x, y) ∧ x ≠ y ∧ ∀ z (B(x ,y) → ( z = x v z = y))]

≡∀x ∀ y [B ( x, y) ∧ x ≠ y ∧ ∀ z (B(x ,y) → ( z = x v z = y))]

De Morgan’s law:

≡∀x ∀ y [¬  B ( x, y) v  ¬ ( x ≠ y) v ∀ z (B(x ,y) → ( z = x v z = y))]

By using De Morgan’s law for quantifiers:

≡∀x ∀ y [¬  B ( x, y) v  x=  y  v Ǝ z¬ (B(x ,z) → ( z = x v z = y))]

(c)  No student in this class has sent e-mail to exactly two other students in this class

Let c(x, y) means “ x has sent email to y” and the domain is all student of class.

Using double negation law:

Ǝ x Ǝ y Ǝ z [c(x, y) ∧c(x ,z) ∧ x≠ y ∧ x ≠z ∧ y ≠ z ∀ w (c(x,w) → ( w = x v w = y v w = z)]

There is a student in class that has sent email to exaxtly two other students in class.

(d)  One student has solved every exercise in this book

Let D(x , y) mean student x has solved exercise y in this book.

The negation:  

Ǝx∀yD(x,y)

Use De Morgan’s law for qualifiers:

    ≡∀ x Ǝ y ¬D(x, y)  

(e). No student has solved at least one exercise in every section of this book.

Let E(x, y,z) be student x has solved exercise y in section z of this book.

We can write “there does not exist a student that solved at least one exercise in all sections of this book”

¬Ǝ x Ǝ y ∀ Z E(x, y, z)  

Negation:

                      ≡¬ [¬ Ǝ x Ǝ y ∀ Z E(x, y, z)  ]

Use double negation law:

                                     ≡ Ǝ x Ǝ y ∀ Z E(x, y, z)  

Ello there mate hows it going? I have done geometry and parlinguals along with alegbra! I am certified as a college professor and am willing to help ya!

PLEASE THANK ME RATE MY QUESTION 5 STARS AND MARK ME BRAINLIEST for my extrodinary and overly qualified help!

A,C

yours,

a soon to be brainliest

[tex]\large\underline{\bf\red{Solution:-}}[/tex]

Given two points are :-

So , we know Two point form into equⁿ using a formula , which is

[tex]\boxed{\purple{\bf{\dag y - y_1 = \dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}(x-x_1)}}}[/tex]

So, on substituting respective values ,

=> y - 3 = (-5-3)/0-(-1) × ( x - 3)

=> y - 3 = -8/1 ( x - 3)

=> y - 3 = -8x +24

=> 8x + y -27 = 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

number one is SAS

1. B. ΔJKE ≅ ΔLYE because SAS.

2. E. No enough information to prove the triangles are congruent.

The SAS theorem is a triangle congruence theorem which states that two triangles which have two pairs of corresponding sides that are congruent and a pair of corresponding included angles that are congruent are congruent triangles.

1. Based on the SAS theorem we can conclude that: B. ΔJKE ≅ ΔLYE because SAS.

2. In the triangles given, we are only given that they have two pairs of corresponding congruent sides. No known congruent sides were given. Therefore, we don't have enough information. The answer is: E. No enough information to prove the triangles are congruent.

Learn more about SAS theorem on:

https://brainly.com/question/2102943

#SPJ9

Step-by-step explanation:

toke a while to finish it, but there you go

cheers and have a good night :D

Answer:

Note: 3/25 and 0.12 are the same

0.12, 3/25, 0.056, 0.1225

OR

3/25 0.12, 0.056, 0.01225

Hope this Helps!

Answer:

x = 1 2/15

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

X=15

Step-by-step explanation:

50−x=80−3x

Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.

50−x=80−3x

50+−x=80+−3x

−x+50=−3x+80

Step 2: Add 3x to both sides.

−x+50+3x=−3x+80+3x

2x+50=80

Step 3: Subtract 50 from both sides.

2x+50−50=80−50

2x=30

Step 4: Divide both sides by 2.

2x \2 = 30 \2

Answer:

x=15

Complete Question

According to a survey, 74% of households said that they have never purchased organic fruits or vegetables. Suppose that this result is true for the current population of households. a. Let x be a binomial random variable that denotes the number of households in a random sample of 10 who have never purchased organic fruits or vegetables. What are the possible values that x can assume? Integers to . b. Find to 3 decimal places the probability that exactly 6 households in a random sample of 10 will say that they have never purchased organic fruits or vegetables. Use the binomial probability distribution formula. Probability

Answer:

a

The possible value of x is 0, 1 ,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

b

[tex]P(X = 6) =   0.158 [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

 The proportion that stated that they have not purchased organic fruits or vegetables is [tex]p =0.74[/tex]

   The sample size is  n = 10

The possible value x can take is  0, 1 ,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

Generally the probability that exactly 6  households in a random sample of 10 will say that they have never purchased organic fruits or vegetables is mathematically represented as

      [tex]P(X = 6) =  ^nC_6 * p^{6}* (1-p)^{n-6}[/tex]

Here C denotes combination

So

        [tex]P(X = 6) =  ^{10}6 * (0.74)^{6}* (1-0.74)^{10-6}[/tex]

=>    [tex]P(X = 6) =   0.158 [/tex]

Answer:

a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number (symbol ∞).

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

he has 7/8 paper divided by 1/5 paper it takes to make the paper plane, it equals 3.5. Three whole ones

Step-by-step explanation:

We have

87+86+x

T is the total scores

n is number of tests done = 3

T/n is greater than or equal to 90

To get minimum test

T/n = 90

T = 90*n

= 90n

We solve for x

Remember n = 3

90x3 = 270

270 = 87+86+x

270 = 173+x

X = 270-173

X = 97

1.

X = 97

2.

You didn't add a value in your part b question. I used 80 though.

T/n < 80

T<80n

80x3= 240

T<240

87+86+x<240

X<240-173

X<67

X has to be less than 67 so we conclude that if x <=67 b grade will be lost.

Answer: 33.33%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

33.3333...%

Step-by-step explanation:

33 x 3 = 99.9999...

=======================================

Work Shown:

We have a geometric sequence

a = first term = -1

r = common ratio = (second term)/(first term) = 2/(-1) = -2

nth term

a(n) = a*(r)^(n-1)

a(n) = -1*(-2)^(n-1)

Now plug in n = 7 to get the 7th term

a(n) = -1*(-2)^(n-1)

a(7) = -1*(-2)^(7-1)

a(7) = -1*(-2)^6

a(7) = -1*(64)

a(7) = -64

The first seven terms are

-1, 2, -4, 8, -16, 32, -64

To get each new term, we multiply the last term by the common ratio -2

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  20 m

Step-by-step explanation:

The 30 m shadow of the tree is 10 times the 3 m length of the person's shadow. We expect the tree to be 10 times as tall as the person:

  10(2 m) = 20 m . . . height of the tree

Answer:

use slope intercept formula

y=Mx +b

Step-by-step explanation:

3X-4Y=8

3X-8 = 4Y

y = 3/4x-2

our new equation just needs to have the same slope  M= 3/4

y-y1=M(x-x1)

y-4=3/4(x-(-16))

y=3/4x+12+4

y=3/4x+16  answer a

for a perpendicular line.. just take the inverse of the slope... and change the sign.  so now our slope is - 4/3

plug in our new point (9,-7)

y-(-7) = -4/3(x-9)

y+7=-4/3x+12

y= -4/3x +5 answer b

Answer:

criteria

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation: