Someone help me I will make you brain

Answer:

After the farmers prayed to the Virgin Mary to protect their crops, ladybugs supposedly appeared to defend the crops. The farmers called the bugs "Beetles of Our Lady," which evolved into "ladybugs" -- hence a reference to the Virgin Mary.

Explanation:

Answer:

it stretches the power of the states

The necessary and proper clause in the Constitution sometimes called the “elastic clause" is It stretches the power of the states. Thus the correct option is D.

A constitution is a fundamental document that defines rules and regulations, laws and legislation as well as the power and authority of the government to conduct the functioning of any country.

The difficulty to list all the functions of government presented the architects of the Constitution with their first immediate challenge. They were aware that the world would soon alter.

The power to create all laws necessary and appropriate for carrying out the aforementioned powers and all other powers granted to the United States government, or any department or officer thereof, by this Constitution belongs to Congress.

The Necessary and Proper Clause, also referred to as the Elastic Clause, permits Congress to pass laws in areas that aren't expressly covered by the Constitution.

Therefore, option D is appropriate.

Learn more about Constitution, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14453917

#SPJ7

Answer:

Approximately between 40K and 50K black Americans fought in France, mainly in the 93rd Division of the AEF.

Explanation:

Answer: a

Explanation:

To protect themselves from an all-powerful central government.

Based on economic theory, when the unemployment rate is low, the prices of goods and services decrease.

During the rise in unemployment, many people have little money to buy goods and services. This, in turn, would lead to a decrease in demand.

As demand decreases, the price of goods and services would decrease to adjust to the quantity demanded.

This situation is based on the law of demand and supply relative to their quantities.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the unemployment rate would affect the price of goods and services in society.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24565414

Answer:the correct answers are b, d, and ethe correct answers are b, d, and e

Explanation:

Answer:

The American army suffered a signifigant defeat by UK forces and the White House was burned down.

A long-term effect is that the USA has not attemped to annex Canada since

Explanation:

I would say the Middle east. Specifically the region of the Holy Land (Jerusalem) in Palestine.

The main point of the crusades was the take that land into the possession of the Christians.

Hope that helps

Answers:

Proof ( from K12 ):

[ I hope this helps!!! ]

-GXLDIE <3

Answer:

A) The expedition was successful-it reached the indies by sailing west.

:D) Magellan found a strait that led through the southern tip of South America, from the Atlantic to the Pacific.

they are all fighting for their freedom and rights to be treated equally in today's society this is what i think

Explanation:

The Congress of Vienna was a success because the congress got a balance of power back to the European countries. The congress also brought back peace among the nations. Europe had peace for about 40 years. ... Yes, because in the end, they did many things that benefited France such as maintain a balance of power in France.

Answer:

The managers of the steel mill sent guards to violently attack the strikers.

Explanation:

The Homestead Strike began in 1892 was a result of the conflict between one of the most powerful corporations Carnegie Steel Company and trade union named Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers. It resulted in a massacre when private guards hired by the steel company came into blood_y conflict with the strikers, resulted in loss of life of nine strikers and seven guards.

Answer:

The answer is B. I got 100% on the test.

Explanation:

Answer:

verify your observations

Explanation:

Answer:

thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks

Answer:

Public funding are funds or resources provided by the State/Government for political parties and/or candidates. Provisions often state that political parties and candidates should have an equitable access to public funds. Oftentimes, the rules regarding public funding are not clearly stated in law, and even if they are, there is often a (real or perceived) misuse of public resources by the incumbent party or candidate. The legal framework can be drafted in a way as to encourage the founding and sustainability of a multi-party system.  Ongoing oversight from a responsible government body combined with public (civil society) oversight through CSO watchdog capacity also can improve the monitoring and full disclosure of funding across party lines and in lines and consistent with the intent of full disclosure and fairness in campaign financing.[1]

Depending on the form in which public resources are made available, public funding is divided into direct public funding or indirect public funding.

Direct public funding is given to political parties and/or candidates in the form of money – usually as bank transfers but at times in cash or cheque.

Indirect public funding is when resources with a monetary value is provided by the Government to political parties and/or candidates.

Arguments against public funding

Those who oppose public funds to political parties or candidates often use one or several of the following arguments:

Public funding increases the distance between political elites (party leadership, candidates) and ordinary citizens (party members, supporters, voters)

When political parties and candidates do not depend on their supporters or members neither for monetary contributions (membership, donations) nor for voluntary labour, they might be less likely to involve them in party decisions or consult their opinions on policy issues.

Public funding preserves a status quo that keeps the established parties and candidates in power

Public funds are often allocated among political parties and candidates in the national legislature. This may make it more difficult for new political forces to gain representation. The legal framework can limit this negative influence by providing special funds for new political parties or candidates.

Through public funds, taxpayers are forced to support political parties and candidates whose views they do not share

Many believe that ordinary taxpayers should not be forced – through the public purse – to support political parties or candidates that they would never choose to vote for. Instead they should have the possibility to decide if and when they want to donate money to a political party or candidate.

Public funds to political parties and candidates takes money away from schools and hospitals to give to rich politicians

When introduced, public funding is often unpopular among the public. Public resources are scarce and needed for everything from schools and hospitals to roads and salaries for staff. To many people, using public funds to give to political parties and candidates would be far down their list of priorities.

Political parties and candidates both take the decision and collect the money

The decision to allocate public funds to parties and candidates is most often taken in the national legislature (or in some cases in the Government). This means that the political parties and candidates who will collect the money, also take the decision.

Political parties risk becoming organs of the State rather than parts of civil society

If all or a substantial amount of the party income comes directly from the State rather than from voluntary sources, political parties risk losing their independence and become organs of the State, thereby losing their ties to the civil society.

sorry de ko po alam answer

Explanation:

sorry po

Answer:

Option A and C

Explanation:

The exceptionally harsh winter put the American army to the test, and hundreds of the 11,000 troops stationed at Valley Forge died of illness. The suffering troops, on the other hand, were held together by their devotion to the Patriot cause and to General Washington, who remained with his men.

Thank you! Please Mark Brainliest!

Answer:

It's Number 1

Explanation:

The french and indians had a very positive relationship... Some french even married the indian women that they had met. The french had good trades with the  natives and  respected them.

Answer:

The Dawes Act (sometimes called the Dawes Severalty Act or General Allotment Act), passed in 1887 under President Grover Cleveland, allowed the federal government to break up tribal lands by partitioning them into individual plots. Only those Native Americans who accepted the individual allotments were allowed to become US citizens.

Explanation:

The Second Amendment allows citizens to own weapons and organize state militias. Option B is the correct answer.

According to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, "a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which contains the first ten amendments to the Constitution.

The Second Amendment guarantees the right of individuals to own firearms while simultaneously recognising the significance of a well-regulated militia for state protection. It ensures people' freedom to bear arms and provides the notion that this right should not be violated by the government. Therefore, Option B is the correct answer.

For such more question on Amendment:

https://brainly.com/question/20336789

#SPJ8

Answer:

Britain is a country and British is the language or people of Britain, like United States and American

Answer:

Peasants in Mexico did not benefit from Mexico's economic growth.

Explanation:

Answer:

sure, but how?

Explanation:

Answer:

its true

Explanation:

trust me

Answer:

the Congress

Explanation:

Answer:

your answer is A

Explanation:

Hayes would also have to agree to name a leading southerner to his cabinet and to support federal aid for the Texas and Pacific Railroad, a planned transcontinental line via a southern route.

Answer:

Well, racism did shape who lived where for a while.

Explanation:

Like, there was this racist thing passed on by a politician that...

Answer:

It did not give the federal government enough power to effectively lead and It imposed taxes that citizens found offensive

Answer:

It was the main form of communication for Muslim traders.