Each of the following was necessary for an Egyptian to reach the afterlife except __________.
A.
mummification
B.
prayer to Amun
C.
possession of earthly goods
D.
travel through the underworld
D : Travel through the under
Answer:
D. Travel through the underworld.
Hope this helps!
--Applepi101
please help.. it'd be appreciated
Define
Natural resource
Renewable resource
Nonrenewable resource
Imports
Exports
Locating Places : What region is a leading oil producer?
Place : What determines the importance of natural resources?
Human/ Environment Interaction : How are renewable and nonrenewable resources different?
Answer:
Natural resource - resources that exist without any actions of humankind. This includes all valued characteristics such as commercial and industrial use, aesthetic value, scientific interest and cultural value. On Earth, it includes sunlight, atmosphere, water, land along with all vegetation, and animal life.
Renewable resource - A renewable resource is a natural resource which will replenish to replace the portion depleted by usage and consumption, either through natural reproduction or other recurring processes in a finite amount of time in a human time scale.
Nonrenewable resource - A non-renewable resource is a natural resource that cannot be readily replaced by natural means at a quick enough pace to keep up with consumption. An example is carbon-based fossil fuel. The original organic matter, with the aid of heat and pressure, becomes a fuel such as oil or gas.
Imports - An import in the receiving country is an export from the sending country. Importation and exportation are the defining financial transactions of international trade. In international trade, the importation and exportation of goods are limited by import quotas and mandates from the customs authority.
Exports - An export in international trade is a good or service produced in one country that is sold into another country. The seller of such goods and services is an exporter; the foreign buyer is an importer. Export of goods often requires the involvement of customers authorities.
2.) U.S., Saudi Arabia, Russia, Canada, and China
3.) Resources are important for the development of any country. For example, to generate energy, one need fossil fuels; and for industrial development, we require mineral resources. Natural resources are getting scarce with the increasing population, so it is essential to conserve them.
4.) Nonrenewable energy resources, like coal, nuclear, oil, and natural gas, are available in limited supplies. This is usually due to the long time it takes for them to be replenished. Renewable resources are replenished naturally and over relatively short periods of time.
Hope this helps!!
Explanation:
Which statements describe factors that led to the decline and defeat of the Aztec Empire? Brainiest to whoever gets it right
Choose all answers that are correct.
The Aztecs were friendly when the Spanish first arrived and brought them gifts.
Despite negotiations, the Spanish and the Aztecs went to war, though neither side wanted to.
Peoples who had been conquered by the Aztecs joined the Spanish to help defeat them.
The Aztecs had no strong leaders and limited military skills.
The Aztecs had never seen steel weapons or horses before.
Answer:
: the answers are A,D,E for B is backwards and C is plainly false they had a strong Empire
Explanation:
pls give me brainliest
Should American teenagers join political parties? State why or why not. Please explain your reasoning with five facts about political parties.
Answer:
It depends on your age. If you are 16-19, yes because you are approaching the age to legally vote. If you are younger, maybe think about your political party that your thinking about joining. Think about your beliefs and why you want those rights.
Explanation:
Hi! :)
Who likes classic rock?
God bless! :)
Answer:
hi
Explanation:
hihihihihihihihihihihihihi
Answer:
I do! I think...
Explanation:
What were THREE reasons that the English government desired to colonize North America?
to convert American Indians to Catholicism
to challenge the French fur trade in North America
to challenge Spanish control of land in the Americas
to gain control of natural resources in the New World
to enable poor English families to move to the colonies
Those are the answers.
A, D, E,
Answer:
A D E
Explanation:
Which of the following describes a sharing of power between a national government and its subdivisions (states)?
Answer:
federalism
Explanation:
ability to split the power with 2 gov divisions
How did the course of the war affect public opinion, and subsequently British leaders in Britain?
Answer:
lol
Explanation:
What is a government that is run by a small group of people?
Select one:
A. democracy
B. autocracy
C. oligarchy
D. communism
Answer:
its C oligarchy
In at least 150-200 words, discuss the pros and cons of westward expansion in the state of Georgia. Consider both the yeoman farmers and Native Americans in your response.
Answer: Pros- here was territorial expansion Proponents of the movement said that with Manifest Destiny, America became what it is today, one of the most powerful countries in the world. When our forefathers followed what was destined for America, the U.S. was able to acquire more properties as well as gold. This also made it possible for more immigrants to have chance to start new lives. It brought more land for farming and improvement.
Those who were in favor of the movement said that with more land area acquired, there were more agriculture land made available which was good for the economy and for supply of food and vegetables for the people. The Manifest Destiny made it possible for the merchants and farmers to produce more crops to consume and sell. It was good for trade and industry.
Proponents said that this opened new doors for trading to other countries. By acquiring lands from other places and even other countries, like Alaska which was bought from Russia, there will be more routes for trade and barter.As it doubled the land area of the U.S., it also increased goods, services and wealth.
Some advocates said that not only did the movement increase the size of the country, expanding to other countries and not just states, but it also added to farm lands needed to produce products and poultry. Moreover, with the territorial expansion not only in Asia but also in Europe, more ports for trade were opened and all these added to the reserves of the country, thus, it brought about more wealth. The gold rush of 1849 is one of the significant events in American history and this happened within the period where Manifest Destiny evolved. It paved the way for Americans to share their culture.
People who lived in the new territories were influenced with the way of life of Americans. It offered a chance for exploration.
One of the benefits advocates for Manifest Destiny claimed was that Americans were given the chance to discover other places other than the community they grew up in. This was not only great for economic improvement but also for personal gain, spiritually, emotionally and socially. By given the chance to be settlers, Americans were able to maximize their potential, discover new ways of living and learn to be innovative. As a whole, this was able to bring more benefits than drawbacks to the American people.
Cons-It brought conflict and war. Opponents of Manifest Destiny argued that this philosophy resulted to war between countries and even the civil war. As early as 1822, the U.S. was already in conflict with Great Britain over the division of Oregon. It also gave a reason for the U.S. to start a war with Mexico and Spain. It was a time of slavery.
One of the drawbacks of U.S. territorial expansion was the proliferation of slavery. Although the Americans made a promise that they will not be taking the land of other people, like the Native Americans, without their consent and other than through peaceful means, history showed that this did not really happen. It led to the death and suffering of many people, particularly, the Indians.
Opponents claim that Manifest Destiny brought about suffering to the people whose land were taken from them without their consent. Along the way, many people were killed and there was mass destruction of tribes. Indians were brought to reservations as well. It is unconstitutional.
Those who are not in favor of what the Manifest Destiny stood for said that what the Southerners did, which was spread slavery, was against the constitution and so is taking other territories that do not really belong to them. They also argued that those who pushed for territorial expansion already knew beforehand that the Native Americans will be uprooted to give way for white settlers and international railroad links and yet they still proceeded. For critics, this is clearly a violation of the rights of the people. Abolitionists said that the constitution did not give the country the right for acquisition of new land areas.
Explanation: I wrote more than 150-200 word but this is like 2-3 paragraphs
Answer: Pros- here was territorial expansion Proponents of the movement said that with Manifest Destiny, America became what it is today, one of the most powerful countries in the world. When our forefathers followed what was destined for America, the U.S. was able to acquire more properties as well as gold. This also made it possible for more immigrants to have chance to start new lives. It brought more land for farming and improvement.
Those who were in favor of the movement said that with more land area acquired, there were more agriculture land made available which was good for the economy and for supply of food and vegetables for the people. The Manifest Destiny made it possible for the merchants and farmers to produce more crops to consume and sell. It was good for trade and industry.
Proponents said that this opened new doors for trading to other countries. By acquiring lands from other places and even other countries, like Alaska which was bought from Russia, there will be more routes for trade and barter.As it doubled the land area of the U.S., it also increased goods, services and wealth.
Some advocates said that not only did the movement increase the size of the country, expanding to other countries and not just states, but it also added to farm lands needed to produce products and poultry. Moreover, with the territorial expansion not only in Asia but also in Europe, more ports for trade were opened and all these added to the reserves of the country, thus, it brought about more wealth. The gold rush of 1849 is one of the significant events in American history and this happened within the period where Manifest Destiny evolved. It paved the way for Americans to share their culture.
People who lived in the new territories were influenced with the way of life of Americans. It offered a chance for exploration.
One of the benefits advocates for Manifest Destiny claimed was that Americans were given the chance to discover other places other than the community they grew up in. This was not only great for economic improvement but also for personal gain, spiritually, emotionally and socially. By given the chance to be settlers, Americans were able to maximize their potential, discover new ways of living and learn to be innovative. As a whole, this was able to bring more benefits than drawbacks to the American people.
Cons-It brought conflict and war. Opponents of Manifest Destiny argued that this philosophy resulted to war between countries and even the civil war. As early as 1822, the U.S. was already in conflict with Great Britain over the division of Oregon. It also gave a reason for the U.S. to start a war with Mexico and Spain. It was a time of slavery.
One of the drawbacks of U.S. territorial expansion was the proliferation of slavery. Although the Americans made a promise that they will not be taking the land of other people, like the Native Americans, without their consent and other than through peaceful means, history showed that this did not really happen. It led to the death and suffering of many people, particularly, the Indians.
Opponents claim that Manifest Destiny brought about suffering to the people whose land were taken from them without their consent. Along the way, many people were killed and there was mass destruction of tribes. Indians were brought to reservations as well. It is unconstitutional.
Those who are not in favor of what the Manifest Destiny stood for said that what the Southerners did, which was spread slavery, was against the constitution and so is taking other territories that do not really belong to them. They also argued that those who pushed for territorial expansion already knew beforehand that the Native Americans will be uprooted to give way for white settlers and international railroad links and yet they still proceeded. For critics, this is clearly a violation of the rights of the people. Abolitionists said that the constitution did not give the country the right for acquisition of new land areas.
Explanation: Pls give branliest this is odessy. Thank You
why did emphasis on gender roles re-emerged after World War II?
Answer:
cause they said women cant fight in war, and they had to stay home with kids (not sure if this is right sorry)
Explanation:
Answer:
during the war- With men away to serve in the military and demands for war material increasing, manufacturing jobs opened up to women and upped their earning power. Yet women's employment was only encouraged as long as the war was on. Once the war was over, federal and civilian policies replaced women workers with men.
Explanation:
after the war- the war changed the lives of tons of women and men in many ways. for exmaple, Wartime needs increased labor demands for female workers, more men died, so more women becamed widowed, and sometimes got to keep husbands property. this soon heightened domestic hardships and responsibilities, and intensified pressures for Americans to conform to social and cultural norms.
The Green Corn Rebellion began as an effort to protest against
A rising corn and wheat prices
B. falling corn and wheat prices
C. American involvement in the war
D. American neutrality in the war
What were the "head and master” statutes?
agreements made by the presidential candidates of 1824
treaties between the Louisiana government and foreign traders
laws created to ensure husbands controlled family property
negotiations between suffrage advocates and the Louisiana government
Answer:
Its C
Explanation:
How did Catholic leaders encourage change during the Catholic Reformation? through a return to Simony through a return to community service with a break from the coaments with a break from church expansion
There were reports that priests, monks and nuns did not behave as well as they should. Some felt that the Catholic Church was more interested in money and power than in saving souls. For example, the church sold 'indulgences' for those who had committed sins. On November 9, 1518 the pope condemned Luther's writings as conflicting with the teachings of the Church. Luther refused to recant, and on January 3, 1521 Pope Leo excommunicated Martin Luther from the Catholic Church. On April 17, 1521 Luther appeared before the Diet of Worms in Germany. How was the Catholic Church corrupt in the period of The Decameron and the Renaissance? During the Renaissance and the time period of The Decameron, the Catholic Church was rife with corruption. Clergy often misbehaved sexually and lived lavishly, despite vows to do otherwise. The Jesuits helped carry out two major objectives of the Counter-Reformation: Catholic education and missionary work. The Jesuits established numerous schools and universities throughout Europe, helping to maintain the relevance of the Catholic church in increasingly secular and Protestant societies. The first effort to stop the spread of protestantism was to declare the effort to reform the Catholic Church a heresy. In 1408 The Catholic Church declared the Lollards heretics and encouraged their persecutions, loss of wealth and even death. By 1438 the Lollard movement was dead.
i already know the answer isnt c.
Answer:
D i think
Explanation:
What type of government did the Mycenaeans have?
A. a democracy where the people voted on decisions
B. a monarchy ruled by a king who made all decisions
C. a theocracy ruled by priests who claimed to speak with the gods
D. an oligarchy where a small group of people ruled together
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The government system of the Mycenaeans was ruled by Kings who monopolized, or acquired, priestly functions. This means that the kings also served as the priests, which made it easier to declare themselves chosen by the gods. In a kingdom, as most people know, the kings (or in this case, Wanax's) were in charge.
A monarchy ruled by a king who made all decisions that type of government the Mycenaeans have. The correct option is B.
What happened Mycenaeans?Given the broken pottery and damaged walls, some researchers think that major natural catastrophes like earthquakes and volcanic eruptions were to blame for the demise of the Mycenaean civilization. These catastrophes would have been devastating, and a change in climate could have resulted from volcanic eruptions.
After at least three generations of rule, the Perseid dynasty came to an end under Eurytheus, who according to legend assigned Hercules to carry out the 12 labors. Atreus succeeded to the throne of Mycenae when Eurytheus was killed in battle. As the home of Agamemnon, the son of Atreus, Mycenae is perhaps best known in mythology.
Thus, the ideal selection is option B.
Learn more about Mycenaeans here:
https://brainly.com/question/18446084
#SPJ6
What Supreme Court case upheld segregation? Dred Scott
Plessy v. Ferguson
14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Leo Frank
“Historians and court scholars agree on a pair of 19th-century opinions: Dred Scott v. Sandford, the 1857 ruling that upheld slavery even in the free states, and Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, which condoned segregation as 'separate but equal.
PLEASE ANSWER QUICKLY 15 POINTS!!
Answer:
I believe it's b sorry if I'm wrong
Answer:
A. when a country is relying on another country for goods and/or service
Explanation:
1. According to Crevecoeur, what happened in the “New World” that didn’t happen in Europe? Why?
2. According to Crevecoeur, how did opportunity and freedom make America?
3. According to Crevecoeur, what did American laws allow?
4. According to Crevecoeur, what didn’t most American’s like?
5. Crevecoeur stated “The American is a new man, who acts upon new principles; he must therefore entertain new ideas and form new opinions. What does he mean?
6. Do you think his description is still true today? Why or Why not?
To Crevecoeur, Americans were "the poor of Europe." In the "great American asylum," these dispossessed individuals found land, livelihood and liberty--regardless of previous nationality. ... Franklin defined Americans as English people; Crevecoeur defined them as mongrel Europeans.
i hope i helped and good luck !!
What statement is most consistent (accurate) with the views of Loyalists in the 1770s?
The king is violating the rights of British citizens.
Taxation without representation is tyranny.
Citizens, under British rule, have the right to declare independence.
The colonists should be grateful to be under British rule and protection.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's the last one.
Explanation:
Loyalist are on the king's side so this one makes more sence.
Answer:
Why did many Americans believe that British tax laws were unfair? colonists ... Which statement shows the views of a Loyalist in the 1770s? *the colonists should be grateful to be under British rule and protection *taxation without representation is tyranny *citizens, under British rule, have the right to declare independence
Explanation:
How might recent events in the United States have influenced the turnoutand the outcome of the elections
Answer:
The handlement of crisises and "wars" (Im not sure if whats happening in the middle east can be called wars) have Americans rethinking the leadership of our president and might make them change parties or canidates for the next election OR people might like how our president handles things and want him to stay in office.
Explanation:
I hope this is what youre looking for:)
Which group fueled the Atlanta Race Riots?
black business leaders
Leo Frank
Catholics
political leaders ELE
I know this is kinda old but i'll still answer it .
Answer:
Political Leaders
Explanation:
In 1906, Atlanta was the scene of a tragic race riot. Newspaper articles had claimed African-Americans had attacked white women. Unemployed whites, fueled by political leaders, viewed the blacks as threats to their jobs and the social order of the south
The Northwest Ordinance discussed slavery.....
what were some strategies used by the labor unions to address the problematic working conditions of the time period.
Answer:
Death????/
Explanation:
What gains and losses did women make in the 1930's and 1940's?
What comparisons can you make to the modern day?
Please write a logical answer.
Answer:
From 1930 to 1940, the number of employed women in the United States ... “Women were more insulated from job loss because they were ... New Deal increased demand for secretarial roles that women rushed to ... as 'birds of passage' coming here do jobs American didn't want to do.
Explanation:
What is the interquartile range?
Answer:
interquartile range (IQR) is a measure of variability, based on dividing a data set into quartiles
Explanation: MARK BRAINILEST THANKS
Answer:
The IQR describes the middle 50% of values when ordered from lowest to highest. To find the interquartile range (IQR), first find the median (middle value) of the lower and upper half of the data. These values are quartile 1 (Q1) and quartile 3 (Q3). The IQR is the difference between Q3 and Q1.
Study the image above. Which of the following should you place on the line labeled "F"?
Judicial
Congress
Executive
Legislative
Please answer the questions!
The ones that i answered were incorrect so pick the one that would be correct.
Will give brainlist to first answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
13 points!!!!!!!
Answer:
it would be a because it had no trade i hope this helps
Explanation:
Answer:
question 4 is B
Explanation:
If you are white and don't like black people can I have your reasoning to think of such things?
Answer:
I like black people and I am white
Explanation:
Answer:
i have no problem
Explanation:
Which statements accurately describe the social structure of the Spanish colonies?
Choose all answers that are correct.
Mixed race people called Mestizo were free but usually poor.
The social structure became more flexible as lower classes gained wealth and power.
Native peoples suffered from prejudice because they refused to work as hard as the Creoles did.
Those who came from Spain, peninsulares, held all the power and wealth and the best positions in the colonies.
People of Spanish descent born in America were called Creoles and rarely obtained jobs with the government.
Answer:
The answer is A,D,E I hope this helps
Explanation:
The correct option is and A). Mixed race people called Mestizo were free but usually poor and B).The social structure became more flexible as lower classes gained wealth and power.
What does the social structure mean?Social structure refers to the organized set of the social institutions and patterns of standardize relationships that together create a society. It is a structure which is built up by persons who are living within a group.
Social structure is the patterned and stable social arrangements in society whereby the humans interacts with each other and live together. It is often treated as a concept of social change within a society.
Spanish colonies follow the social structure that was divided into a caste system. The social structure in the Spanish colonies are as follows Peninsula, Creoles, Mestizos, Mulattoes, Native Americans and Africans.
Learn more about social structure here:-
https://brainly.com/question/13465651
#SPJ2