What is the solution to this equation?
3x - 5 + 2x = 25
O A. x = 6
O B. x = 30
O C. x = 4
O D. x = 20

Answer:

a

The confidence interval for the population variance is ​[tex] 5.49 < \sigma^2 < 37.02 [/tex]  

The correct option is  C

b

The confidence interval for the population standard deviation is [tex] 2.34 < \sigma < 6.08 [/tex]

The correct option is  A

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The sample size is  n =  14

    The standard deviation is  [tex]s = \$3.42[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

     [tex]df =  14 -1[/tex]

=>   [tex]df =  13 [/tex]    

Given that the confidence level is  98%  then that level of significance is  

     [tex]\alpha = (100 -98) \%[/tex]

=>  [tex]\alpha = 0.02[/tex]

Generally the 98% confidence interval for the variance  is mathematically represented as

     [tex]\frac{(n- 1) s^2}{x^2 _{[\frac{\alpha }{2} , df]}}  < \sigma^2 < \frac{(n- 1) s^2}{x^2 _{[1- \frac{\alpha }{2} , df]}}[/tex]

=> [tex]\frac{(14- 1) (3.42)^2}{x^2 _{[\frac{0.02 }{2} , 13]}}  < \sigma^2 < \frac{(14- 1) (3.42)^2}{x^2 _{[1- \frac{0.02 }{2} , 13]}}[/tex]

From the chi -distribution table  

     [tex]x^2 _{[1- \frac{0.02 }{2} , 13]} = 4.107[/tex]

and

    [tex]x^2 _{[\frac{0.02 }{2} , 13]} = 27.689[/tex]

So

=> [tex]\frac{(14- 1) (3.42)^2}{27.689}  < \sigma^2 < \frac{(14- 1) (3.42)^2}{4.107}[/tex]    

=> [tex] 5.49 < \sigma^2 < 37.02 [/tex]    

Generally the 98% confidence interval for the standard deviation   is mathematically represented as

   [tex]\sqrt{\frac{(n- 1) s^2}{x^2 _{[\frac{\alpha }{2} , df]}}}   < \sigma <\sqrt{ \frac{(n- 1) s^2}{x^2 _{[1- \frac{\alpha }{2} , df]}}}[/tex]

=> [tex]\sqrt{5.49}  < \sigma < \sqrt{37.02 }[/tex]

=> [tex] 2.34 < \sigma < 6.08 [/tex]

Answer:

D

or

It is shifted 2 units up and 2 units right.

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph of  y = sec(x) is shifted 2 units up and 2 units right.

Graph is a mathematical representation of a network and it describes the relationship between lines and points.

The given graph is  y = sec(x)

After transformation it is y = sec(x - 2) + 2

We need to find the transformation applied to y=secx to get  y = sec(x - 2) + 2.

Graph transformation is the process by which an existing graph, or graphed equation, is modified to produce a variation of the proceeding graph.

y=f(x-a) is the same graph shifted 'a' units to the right. If 'a' is negative, then, the graph is shifted to the left.

y = f(x) - a is the same graph, but shifted 'a' units downwards. If 'a' is negative, then the graph will be shifted upwards.

In this case, our main function is y=sec(x). And the function y= sec(x-2)+2 is shifted two units to the right and 2 units upwards.

Hence, the graph of  y = sec(x) is shifted 2 units up and 2 units right.

To learn more on Graph click:

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ5

Answer:

2.79 kilometers

Step-by-step explanation:

4.5/1.61

Answer:

Claires mother did better because her z score was greater than Claires

Step-by-step explanation:

I j took the quiz

Claire's mother did better because her z-score was greater than that of Claires.

A Z-score is defined as the fractional representation of data point to the mean using standard deviations.

As per the given information, the solution would be as

Here is Claire's data:

ц₁ = 510

σ₁ = 110

X₁ = 690

⇒ z-score = (X₁-ц₁ )/σ₁

Substitute the values,

⇒ z-score = (690 - 510)/110

⇒ z-score = 180/110

⇒ z-score = 1.636

Here is Claire's mother's data:

ц = 490

σ₂ = 100

X₂ = 680

⇒ z-score = (X₂-ц )/σ₂

Substitute the values,

⇒ z-score = (680 - 490)/100

⇒ z-score = 190/100

⇒ z-score = 1.9

So Claire's mother's z-score > Claire's z-score

Therefore, Claire's mother did better because her z-score was greater than that of Claires.

Learn more about the z-score here:

brainly.com/question/13793746

#SPJ5

Answer:

Your answer would be 15

Step-by-step explanation:

The first step you are going to want to do is multiply 2 and 30

30×2=60

Then you are going to divide 60 by 12

60÷12=5

Last you wanna add the 5 and the 10

5+10=15

Answer: Images of Graphs are listed below. I am unsure on how to conduct the second part. but there is the first part

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7/8, 0.86, 0.9

Step-by-step explanation:

Convert 7/8 to a decimal:

7 / 8 = .875

Solve:

.875, .86, .9

Or:

7/8, 0.86, 0.9

Step-by-step explanation:

let chairs be C and sofas be S

The objective function is

Maximize

90C+75S=P

The constraints are

carpentry

3C+2S=66------1

finishing

9C+4S=180-----2

upholstery

2C+10S=200-----3

C>0, S>0

The linear programming is

3C+2S=66

9C+4S=180

2C+10S=200

Answer and explanation:

Please find attached answer and explanation

Answer: x=40

Step-by-step explanation:

x+2x+x+20=180

first you combine the like terms which are (x, 2x, x) and get 4x.

now you have 4x+20=180

next you subtract 20 on both sides:

4x+20=180

     -20 -20

and get 4x=160

finally you divide 4 on both sides and get a final answers of x=40

Answer:

336

Step-by-step explanation:

It is given that,

Total number of individuals are 8

They are candidates for positions of president, vice president, and treasurer of an organization.

It is a based on permutations. We need to find P(8,3). It can be calculated as follows :

[tex]P(n,r)=\dfrac{n!}{(n-r)!}[/tex]

So,

[tex]P(8,3)=\dfrac{8!}{(8-3)!}\\\\=\dfrac{8!}{5!}\\\\=\dfrac{8\times 7\times 6\times 5!}{5!}\ [\because n!=n(n-1)!]\\\\=8\times 7\times 6\\\\=336[/tex]

Hence, there are 336 possibilities of selections.

Answer:

y=1.003009+0.003453x

or

GPA=1.003009+0.003453(SAT Score)

Step-by-step explanation:

The least square regression equation can be written as

y=a+bx

In the given scenario y is the GPA and x is SAT score because GPA depends on SAT score.

SAT score (X) GPA (Y) X²         XY

421           2.93 177241 1233.53

375          2.87         140625 1076.25

585          3.03 342225 1772.55

693          3.42  480249 2370.06

608          3.66 369664 2225.28

392          2.91  153664 1140.72

418           2.12  174724 886.16

484          2.5    234256 1210

725             3.24  525625  2349

506          1.97   256036 996.82

613           2.73  375769 1673.49

706          3.88 498436 2739.28

366           1.58  133956 578.28

sumx=6892

sumy=36.84

sumx²=3862470

sumxy=20251.42

n=13

[tex]b=\frac{(nsumxy)-(sumx)(sumy)}{nsumx^{2}-(sumx)^{2} }[/tex]

b=9367.18/2712446

b=0.003453

a=ybar-b(xbar)

ybar=sum(y)/n

ybar=2.833846

xbar=sum(x)/n

xbar=530.1538

a=2.833846-0.003453*(530.1538)

a=1.003009

Thus, required regression equation is

y=1.003009+0.003453x.

The​ least-squares regression equation that shows the best relationship between GPA and the SAT score is

GPA=1.003009+0.003453(SAT Score)

Answer:

x=½, -2

x= 0.5, -2

possibly im not perfect

Answer:

x = 5/(-4 z + y)

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for x:

x y - 4 x z = 5

Hint: | Write the linear polynomial on the left-hand side in standard form.

Collect in terms of x:

x (-4 z + y) = 5

Hint: | Solve for x.

Divide both sides by -4 z + y:

Answer: x = 5/(-4 z + y)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

13/16 dived by 5/6 = 9/40

7 dived by 1/6 = 42

2 1/5 dived by 1 1/3 = 1 13/20

2 1/7 dived by 3/28 = 20

Answer: $3703.70

Step-by-step explanation:

200x.054=$3703.70

Answer:

The data given is  

    235,000 271,900 183,300 203,000 182,900 225,500 189,000 214,200 237,900 233,500 217,000 230,400 202,950, 216,500 209,900, 245,500

  The sample size is  n =  16

   The population is  [tex]\mu  =  \$201,800[/tex]

  The sample mean is mathematically represented as

             [tex]\= x =\frac{\sum x_i}{n}[/tex]

=>  [tex]\= x  =\frac{235,000 + 271,900 + \cdots + 245,500 }{16}[/tex]

=>    [tex]\= x  = 218653.125[/tex]

Generally the sample standard deviation is mathematically represented as

     [tex]s =  \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - \= x)^2}{n} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]s =  \sqrt{\frac{ (235,000 -  218653.125)^2+ (271,900 -  218653.125)^2 + \cdots +  (245,500 -  218653.125)^2}{16} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]s =  23946.896 [/tex]

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu =  \$201,800[/tex]

The alternatively hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu >  \$201,800 [/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

     [tex]t =  \frac{\= x  - \mu }{ \frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

=>  [tex]t =  \frac{218653.125  - 201800 }{ \frac{23946.896 }{\sqrt{16} } }[/tex]

=>  [tex]t =  2.82[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

     [tex]df =  n - 1[/tex]

=>   [tex]df =  16 - 1[/tex]

=>   [tex]df =  15[/tex]

Generally the probability of  [tex]t =  2.82[/tex] at a degree of freedom of  [tex]df =  15[/tex] from the t - distribution table  is  

     [tex]p-value  = P( t >2.82 ) =0.00646356[/tex]

The

From the values obtained we see that [tex]p-value  < \alpha[/tex]

The decision rule is  

   Reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

 There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the real estate company's  projection is true

Given that the population variance is unknown then the best statistical distribution to be applied is the t -distribution

Type I  Error

 The type 1 error occur when the null hypothesis is wrongfully rejected

  The consequence in this case is the company will assume that the average selling price has increase and this will lead the company to start expanding the business while in the real sense the average selling price is still  $201,800

   Type II  Error

 The  type 11 error occur when the null hypothesis is wrongfully  accepted(i.e wrongfully failed to reject the null hypothesis)

    The consequence in this case is that the company will assume that the average selling price  is still $201,800 and will not make plans to increase the business while in the real sense the average selling price has increased

   Given that resource is scare the management of the company will want a  smaller  significance level in order not to commit type I error which will lead to wrongly expanding the business and wastes of resources

generally the critical value  of  [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] from the normal distribution table is    

     [tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } = 1.96[/tex]

Generally the margin of error is mathematically represented as

   [tex]E  =Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } *  \frac{s}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

=>[tex]E  =1.96*  \frac{23946.896}{\sqrt{16} }[/tex]

=>[tex]E  = 11733.96[/tex]

Generally the 95% confidence interval is  mathematically represented as

     [tex]218653.125 - 11733.96  < \mu  <  218653.125 + 11733.96[/tex]

=>  [tex]206919.165  < \mu  <  230387.085[/tex]  

Generally there is 95% confidence that the actual average selling price is within this interval  

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2.99

Step-by-step explanation:

1.) 2 goes into 5 2 times. So the 2 goes on top of the division sign

2.) 2x2=4

3.) Move 4 below 5

4.) Subtract 5-4=1

5.) Bring down 9

6.) 2 Goes into 19 9 times

7.) 2x9=18

8.) 19-18=1

9.) Bring down the 7

10.) 2 Goes into 17 8 times

11.) 2x8= 16

12.) 17-16=1

13.) Add a zero onto the end, bring down that zero

14.) 2 goes into 10 5 times.

15.) Round answer to 2.99 because with money you only have two decimals

Answer:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it says 500+35x, then x is the number hours he will work

The answer is the number of hours.

Answer:

x= 15/19 = 0.789

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 0.789 is the correct answer plz brainliest big brother

[tex]7 + \dfrac{2}{3x} = - 1 \\ \implies \: \dfrac{2}{3x} = - 1 - 7 \\ \implies \: \dfrac{2}{3x} = - 8 \\ \implies \: 2 = - 24x \\ \implies \: x = - \dfrac{2}{24} \\ \implies \: x = - \dfrac{1}{12} [/tex]

Answer:

x = -12

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply all terms by 3 to get whole numbers

->21+2x=-3

subtract 21 both sides to isolate the variable

->2x=-24

divide by 2 both sides to simplify

->x=-12

Answer:

80

gummi bears

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the correct answer is -8

Step-by-step explanation:

to find this you are going to substitute 8 in for x in the equation

Answer:

The correct option is (c).

Step-by-step explanation:

The height of a diver abov the water is given by :

[tex]h(t) = -5t^2 + 10t + 3[/tex] ....(1)

Where h(t) is in meters and t is in seconds

Put t = 1 s, in equation (1) we get :

[tex]h(1) = -5(1)^2 + 10(1) + 3\\\\=8\ \text{feet}[/tex]

Put t = 5 s, in equation (1) we get :

[tex]h(1) = -5(5)^2 + 10(5) + 3\\\\=-72\ \text{feet}[/tex]

Out of the given options, "after 1 second, the diver will be 8 feet above  the water is (c)". Hence, the correct option is (c).

Answer:

a) The store which provides the lowest total costs is:

True Builders

b) The cost without sales tax is:

$407.48

Step-by-step explanation:

Data and Calculations:

Product                Quantity       True Builders               Quality Suppliers

                                               Price          Costs             Price          Costs

Bricks                      120        $2.20       $264.00         $2.25      $270.00

2 x 4 boards            40 ft     $0.75            30.00         $0.70           28.00

1 x 6 boards           120 ft     $0.60            72.00         $0.65           78.00

2 x 6 boards           30 ft     $0.80            24.00         $0.80           24.00

Paint                        2 gal.    $15.50           31.00         $11.25          22.50

Paint Brushes         2           $7.50            15.00          $9.75           19.50

Total costs                                           $436.00                          $442.00

Imputed Sales Tax of 7%                        28.52                              28.92

Without Sales Tax                              $407.48                           $413.08

Answer:

Quality Supplies 442.00

Step-by-step explanation:

Ben drinks 3 1/2 liters of tea every 40 minutes.

This means that he would drink 1 3/4 of tea every 20 minutes (divide both sides by 2).

Now, let's multiply each side by 3.  

1.75 * 3 = 5.25 (aka 5 1/4)

20 * 3 = 60 minutes (an hour)

He drinks 5 1/4 liters of tea in one hour.

Answer:

42 liters

Step-by-step explanation:

3.5x4=14 in 1 hour

14x3=42liters in 3 hours

Answer:

266.162 ml

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8.2/10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

42/50

Step-by-step explanation: