What type of bond is shown in the figure?

Answer:

The skier is experimenting a net force of 0 newtons in both cases. ([tex]v_{1} = 15\,\frac{km}{h}[/tex], [tex]v_{2} = 20\,\frac{km}{h}[/tex])

Explanation:

According to Newton's First Law, an object is in equilibrium when it is either at rest or moving at constant velocity, which means that net force is equal to 0 newtons.

Therefore, the skier is experimenting a net force of 0 newtons in both cases.

Answer:

velocity, v = 15m / 3.0s

= 5 ms^-1

velocity = wavelength × frequency

5 ms^-1 = 1.5m × f

f = 5 ms^-1 / 1.5 m

f = 3.33 Hz

f = 1/T

T = 1/f

= 1/ 3.33 Hz

= 0.3 s

frequency, f = 3.33 Hz

period, T = 0.3 s

Answer:

9s

Explanation:

v=u+at

36=0+4t

t=36-0/4

t=9s

Answer:

The wave velocity and the wavelength are related to the wave's frequency and period by vw=λT or vw=fλ. The time for one complete wave cycle is the period T. The number of waves per unit time is the frequency ƒ. The wave frequency and the period are inversely related to one another.

Explanation:

Answer: 5.4 seconds

Explanation:

The time taken to stop the bicycle is 5.4 seconds. The final velocity is zero. Then, the distance travelled by the bicycle is 36.45 m.

Acceleration is a physical quantity that, measures the rate of change in velocity. It is a vector quantity thus having both magnitude and direction. It can be defines as the ratio of change in velocity to the change in time.

Given initial velocity = 13.5 m/s

final velocity is zero since the bicycle is stopping.

then Δt = Δv/a

Δt = 13.5 m/s/ 2.50 m/s² = 5.4 seconds.

Hence, the bicycle will take 5.4 s to complete stop.

The distance covered within this time can be determined using the equation as follows:

s = ut + 1/2 at²

where u is the initial velocity

s =  (13 m/s × 5.4 s) + (-2.50 m/s² ×5.4 s ×5.4 s) = 36.4 m.

Therefore, the bicycle will travel up to 36.4 m before stopping.

Find more on acceleration:

https://brainly.com/question/2303856

#SPJ2

Answer:

C. 110 m/s2

Explanation:

Force = Mass x Acceleration

Since we have the force and the mass, we can rearrange this equation to solve for acceleration by dividing both sides by mass:

Force/Mass = (Mass x Acceleration)/Mass

Acceleration = Force/Mass

Now we just have to plug in our values and calculate!

Acceleration = 48.4/0.44

Acceleration = 110m/s/s

It is option C. 110 m/s2

Hope this helped!

Answer:

la respuesta esta abajo

Explanation:

La velocidad de un objeto A relativa a otro objeto B es la velocidad que el objeto A parecería tener para un observador que se mueve con B.

a) La velocidad relativa de dos cuerpos que se mueven en la dirección opuesta es la suma de su velocidad. Por lo tanto:

Velocidad relativa = 80 + 70 = 150 km / h

b) La velocidad relativa de dos cuerpos que se mueven en la misma dirección es la diferencia entre su velocidad. Por lo tanto:

Velocidad relativa = 80 - 70 = 10 km / h

Answer:

i think its electrons

Explanation:

Answer:

If I was riding my bicycle, and there was no friction to work against Newton's First Law, I'd give a first push, and I would never be able to turn or stop.

Explanation:

Answer:

The acceleration is 2 m/s² in Camila's direction.

Explanation:

The acceleration can be found using the following equation:

[tex] \Sigma F = ma [/tex]

Where

F is the force

m is the mass of the taffy = 1.5 kg

a is the acceleration =?

Since Emma pulls one end of the taffy with 20 N and Camila pulls the other end with 23 N we have:

[tex] F_{C} - F_{E} = ma [/tex]

[tex]23 N - 20 N = 1.5 kg*a [/tex]

[tex] a = 2 m/s^{2} [/tex]

Hence, the acceleration is 2 m/s² in Camila's direction.

I hope it helps you!

Answer:

Tire

Explanation:

Answer:

Because it has more texture and is solid. Its like glass

Explanation:

Answer:

Why is ice more reflective (has higher albedo) than liquid water? They're both the same substance (water). Is something quantum mechanical involved?

Explanation:

In fact ice is slightly less reflective than water. The reflectivity is related to the refractive index (in a rather complicated way) and the refractive index of ice is 1.31 while the refractive index of water is 1.33. The slightly lower refractive index of ice will cause a slightly lower reflectivity. In both cases the reflectivity is about 0.05 i.e. at an air/water or air/ice surface about 5% of the light is reflected.

Answer:

Nebula

Explanation:

 Given that in the constellation of Orion, you can see a group of stars and other objects that appear in the shape of a sword. Ln the middle of the sword, a bright "fuzzy star" appears. Astronomers looking at this object through telescopes refer to it as a "stellar nursery." Another name for this object is called NEBULA.

The space where new stars are forming anew is known as nebulae

Answer:

B 8-9 because you had to subtract that number or simplify. then your answer is 8-9

Answer:

The relative velocity of the boy with respect to the sea is 37.7 km/hr

Explanation:

Answer:

37.7 km/hr I'd the velocity

Answer:

stupid question

Explanation:

Answer: mmm... If you mean most like Basketball it's net ball but i don't know much about Basket ball teams

Explanation:

Answer:

B It must have been tested by many scientists.

Explanation:

trust me :)

For a hypothesis to become generally accepted by scientists, It must have been tested by many scientists. Hence option B is correct.

A hypothesis is a theory put up to explain a phenomena. A hypothesis must be testable according to the scientific method for it to be considered a scientific hypothesis. Scientific hypotheses are often based on prior findings that cannot be adequately explained by the current body of knowledge. Despite the fact that the terms "hypothesis" and "theory" are sometimes used interchangeably, they are not the same thing. A working hypothesis is an acknowledged theory that has been tentatively supported and is put up for further investigation.

In formal logic, the term "hypothesis" is used to refer to the antecedent of a statement, or in the proposition, in a different sense.

Hence option B is correct.

To know more about hypothesis :

https://brainly.com/question/29519577

#SPJ5.

Answer:

C. Law Of Conservation Of Mass

Explanation:

In this scenario, this would occur due and is explained by the Law of Conservation of Mass. This law basically states that the mass that exists during and after a chemical reaction must remain the same, assuming that the reaction is taking place in a closed environment where no loss of mass is occurring. This means that if the reaction is in a closed environment the mass should not change whatsoever even if it is not in the same form or substance as it was before the reaction occurred.

Answer:

Explanation:

The answer to that question is "both," though past players tend to have used heavier bats than do today's players. Baseball's "king of swat" Babe Ruth reportedly began his hitting career using a 54 ounce (1.5 kg) hickory bat, and is known to have used a 40oz bat in 1927 when he hit his 60 home runs.[1] Ty Cobb and Joe Di Maggio both played with 42oz bats and Rogers Hornsby used a 50oz piece of lumber. George Sisler, playing for the St. Louis Browns in the 1920's, made his bat heavier by hammering Victrola needles into the barrel of his bat.[2] In the 1950's Cincinnati Reds' Ted Kluszeski hammered tenpenny nails into his bat to make it heavier.

Other great hitters including Ted Williams, Rod Carew and Stan Musial used much lighter bats: 31-33oz.[1] Roger Maris used a 33oz bat to hit his 61 home runs in 1961. Many players have tried to make their bats lighter by drilling a hole in the barrel and filling it with cork. Detroit Tigers' Norm Cash admitted to using a corked bat in 1961 when he won the batting title with a .361 average (though he slumped to .243 the next year with the same corked bat).[2]

Kirkpatrick[3] reports that Roger Maris participated in a 1962 experiment in which he batted for distance with 5 different new bats whose weights varied from 33 to 47oz. He hit 5 long fly balls with each bat and the distances were measured and correlated to bat weight. The heavier bats, on average, resulted in further distance. However, Maris' preferred bat (which he used to break Babe Ruth's home run record) was the lightest of the set, even though it produced the shortest distance fly balls. Mark McGwire used a 35oz bat to hit his 70 home runs in 1998, and Barry Bonds used a 32oz bat to hit his 73 home runs in 2001. Most of today's major league players typically use 31-35oz bats.

Physicists have shown,[3,4] from a simple collision analysis, that the optimum bat weight is between 15 and 18oz. However, no professional batter uses a bat this light (in fact, you cannot make a wood bat this light). NCAA regulations[x] recently imposed a -3 rule (length in inches minus weigh in ounces cannot exceed 3) so that 34 inch bats must weigh 31oz. So far no such rule exists for Little League play, and -12 composite bats were introduced for the 2003 season. This brings us back to our original questions: which is better: heavier or lighter bats? So, what is the optimum bat weight, and what criteria influence this choice? Let's start by looking at the collision between ball and bat.

Answer:false

Explanation:

Answer:

Magnitude of frictional force = 30 N

Explanation:

According to the second Newton's law, the net force exerted by an external agent on an object of mass m is:

Fn=m.a

The net force is the vector addition of each individual force. If the sum of all the forces acting on an object is zero, then the acceleration is zero. That means the object moves at a constant speed or is at rest.

When an object is pushed across a horizontal rough surface, there are two forces acting in the direction of the motion: The applied force and the frictional force.

If the applied force is greater than the frictional force, then the object moves at a constant positive acceleration. If the frictional force is greater than the applied force, then the object won't move at all (if it was at rest) or will start a deaccelerated motion (braking).

Finally, if both forces are equal, the object will move at a constant speed or remains at rest. Since the box is moving at a constant speed, we can conclude the frictional force equals the applied force:

Magnitude of frictional force = 30 N

Answer:

Disliking something

Explanation:

For an example : Ah you disgust me

Answer:

Strongly disproval of something (usual this something is gross)

"Profound dislike or annoyance caused by something sickening or offensive." - The Free Dictionary

Explanation:

Example: Her attitude filled me with disgust

Example 2: Your gross remarks disgust me.

Answer:c

Explanation:

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Protons and neutrons are found in the nucleus

Answer:

option D

Explanation:

this is because it occurs in many different dimensions, including biological, cognitive and socioemotional. this is also the answer on apex.

Answer D would be correct for a p e x

Answer:

the shortest path between two points is displacement..

Explanation:

Hope this helps you✌️✌️

Thanks .....

Follow for more help...

insta id :-ankitakki45..