Answer:
Executive Branch
Explanation:
In the United States, the branch of government that is in charge of the military is the Executive Branch, specifically the President of the United States, who is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. However, the legislative branch, specifically the Congress, has the power to declare war, raise and support armies, and make rules governing the military. So, while the President is in charge of the military, the Congress has an important role in overseeing and regulating the military's activities.
depict the pic in about 100 words regarding social welfare
A social welfare system offers assistance to individuals and families in need, with such programs as health care assistance, food stamps, and unemployment compensation.
Lesser known parts of a social welfare system include disaster relief and educational assistance.
What is social welfare?Social welfare encompasses help provided to persons in need; activities and resources to enhance or promote the well-being of individuals, families and the larger society; and broad efforts to eliminate or reduce the incidence of social problems.
The history of social welfare is an interdisciplinary study of the evolution of charitable works, organized activities related to social reform movements and non-profit or public social services designed to protect or benefit individuals, families and citizens of the larger society. Charitable efforts have often grown out of religious beliefs — beliefs that inspired reformers to deep compassion, firm ethical convictions, and a strong sense of justice.
The reformers’ faith backgrounds were the foundation of movements such as abolition, temperance, and the establishment of settlement houses.
Learn more about social welfare, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29214791
#SPJ5
QUESTION 1 Ms Eve (her name has been withheld as she is a minor) is a grade 11 learner. In her first three years at high school she was very rebellious and constantly flouted school rules. She recently became very religious and has started wearing a head scarf to school with her existing school uniform. She has been warned verbally by her class teacher and the principal that this is in contravention of the school's strict rules regulating uniforms. On 01 March 2013 her parents receive a letter from the school stating that she is required to comply with the with school uniform rules which provide that only 'school hats may be worn with school uniforms and designated white sport hats with sports uniforms. No other head gear may be worn by learners. The letter informs Ms Eve's parents that a head scarf is not a school hat and may not therefore be worn at the school. The letter states further that the school's reasons for its approach are: a) The school's uniform policy serves the purpose of ensuring that learners are neat and tidy for school. It also ensures that all learners wear appropriate clothing including sun hats when they are outside. b) The school is non-denominational, and the school does not want show favouritism towards any one religion; and c) They believe that this is simply another of Ms Eve's antics that reflect her defiant attitude towards authority. Ms Eve and her parent are angry at the school's refusal to accommodate her religious beliefs. Ms Eve feels that she is being treated like a child and that none of her teachers take her religious beliefs seriously which undermine her dignity. Ms Eve and her parents approach you for advice on the following issues: i. ii. iv. Would the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000 apply to this dispute and why? Has Ms Eve been discriminated against in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000? If there is discrimination, would it be unfair? If there is a finding of discrimination would the discrimination be unfair in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000? Page 2 of 4
i. Yes, the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000 would apply to this dispute as it prohibits any form of discrimination based on religious belief. Under this Act, any form of discrimination based on a person's religious beliefs is prohibited.
What is Equality?Equality is a concept that is centered around the idea of fairness and equity for all. It is the belief that people of all backgrounds, genders, ethnicities, and sexual orientations should have the same rights, opportunities, and access to resources.
ii. Yes, Ms Eve has been discriminated against in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000. The school's refusal to accommodate her religious beliefs is an example of discrimination, as they are not allowing her to practice her religion.
iii. Yes, the discrimination would be considered unfair in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000. This Act explicitly prohibits any form of discrimination based on religious belief, and the school's refusal to accommodate Ms Eve's religious beliefs would constitute unfair discrimination.
iv. Yes, if there is a finding of discrimination, the discrimination would be considered unfair in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000. This Act explicitly prohibits any form of discrimination based on religious belief, and the school's refusal to accommodate Ms Eve's religious beliefs would constitute unfair discrimination.
To learn more about Equality
https://brainly.com/question/23173347
#SPJ9
i. Yes, the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000 would apply to this dispute as it prohibits any form of discrimination based on religious belief. Under this Act, any form of discrimination based on a person's religious beliefs is prohibited.
What is Equality?Equality is a concept that is centered around the idea of fairness and equity for all. It is the belief that people of all backgrounds, genders, ethnicities, and sexual orientations should have the same rights, opportunities, and access to resources.
ii. Yes, Ms Eve has been discriminated against in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000. The school's refusal to accommodate her religious beliefs is an example of discrimination, as they are not allowing her to practice her religion.
iii. Yes, the discrimination would be considered unfair in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000. This Act explicitly prohibits any form of discrimination based on religious belief, and the school's refusal to accommodate Ms Eve's religious beliefs would constitute unfair discrimination.
iv. Yes, if there is a finding of discrimination, the discrimination would be considered unfair in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000. This Act explicitly prohibits any form of discrimination based on religious belief, and the school's refusal to accommodate Ms Eve's religious beliefs would constitute unfair discrimination.
To learn more about Equality
https://brainly.com/question/23173347
#SPJ9
Alcohol can complicate the safety of vulnerable roadway users by making their movements...
A. slower than normal.
B. more aggressive.
C. difficult to predict.
Answer:
C. difficult to predict.
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. difficult to predict.
Alcohol consumption can affect a person's ability to make sound judgments and decisions, impair their motor skills, and affect their balance and coordination. As a result, alcohol consumption can make the movements of vulnerable roadway users such as pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists unpredictable. They may stumble, fall, or move suddenly in unexpected ways, which can increase the risk of accidents.
While alcohol consumption can also slow down a person's movements, making them slower than normal, and can increase aggression, making their movements more aggressive, these effects are not directly related to the unpredictability of their movements. Therefore, option C is the best answer.
Hope this helps!
In your opinion, should the US Supreme Court rule in favor of or against the banning of the abortion pill in all states, regardless of whether abortion is legal in some states?
(1 paragraph)
Answer:
Arguments for banning the abortion pill in all states include the belief that it is necessary to protect the health and safety of women. Supporters of the ban argue that the abortion pill carries potential health risks, including bleeding, infection, and incomplete abortion. They believe that by regulating the use of the abortion pill, they can prevent these risks and protect the health of women.
Another argument for the ban is based on moral and ethical considerations. Some people believe that abortion is wrong and that the government has a duty to protect the rights of the unborn. Supporters of the ban believe that by limiting access to the abortion pill, they can reduce the number of abortions and protect the rights of the unborn.
Explanation:
QUESTION 1 Ms Eve (her name has been withheld as she is a minor) is a grade 11 learner. In her first three years at high school she was very rebellious and constantly flouted school rules. She recently became very religious and has started wearing a head scarf to school with her existing school uniform. She has been warned verbally by her class teacher and the principal that this is in contravention of the school's strict rules regulating uniforms. On 01 March 2013 her parents receive a letter from the school stating that she is required to comply with the with school uniform rules which provide that only 'school hats may be worn with school uniforms and designated white sport hats with sports uniforms. No other head gear may be worn by learners. The letter informs Ms Eve's parents that a head scarf is not a school hat and may not therefore be worn at the school. The letter states further that the school's reasons for its approach are: a) The school's uniform policy serves the purpose of ensuring that learners are neat and tidy for school. It also ensures that all learners wear appropriate clothing including sun hats when they are outside. b) The school is non-denominational, and the school does not want show favouritism towards any one religion; and c) They believe that this is simply another of Ms Eve's antics that reflect her defiant attitude towards authority. Ms Eve and her parent are angry at the school's refusal to accommodate her religious beliefs. Ms Eve feels that she is being treated like a child and that none of her teachers take her religious beliefs seriously which undermine her dignity. Ms Eve and her parents approach you for advice on the following issues: i. ii. iv. Would the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000 apply to this dispute and why? Has Ms Eve been discriminated against in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000? If there is discrimination, would it be unfair? If there is a finding of discrimination would the discrimination be unfair in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000? Page 2 of 4
Answer:
yes, this would fall into the category of unfair discrimination. The school states that they do not want to pick favorites when it comes to religion so they don't allow anything religious but by doing so they are, in a way, discriminating against one's beliefs. some religions require females to wear a head scarf when in public so this should be allowed within the school along with other religious beliefs, by doing this you are not pick favorites.
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP!!!
A. Animals are converting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to oxygen.
B. Animals are decomposing and releasing carbon into the soil.
C. Animals are releasing energy into the environment and storing carbon.
D. Animals are breaking down organic molecules and releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
What was the New Jersey plan for the federal government
Answer:William Paterson's New Jersey Plan proposed a unicameral (one-house) legislature with equal votes of states and an executive elected by a national legislature. This plan maintained the form of government under the Articles of Confederation while adding powers to raise revenue and regulate commerce and foreign affairs.
Explanation:
4
are groups of criminals who band together to commit many different types of crime.
O A. Organized crime networks
Cybercriminals
B.
O C.
O D. Human traffickers
Terrorists
Reset
Next
Option (d), The criminal organizations collectively referred to as "terrorists" commit a variety of crimes.
What do you know about terrorism as a criminal enterprise?Terrorism tries to topple the incumbent regime by altering the status quo. On the other hand, organized crime wants to create an alternative government that coexists with the present one. Second, while it is ostensibly the goal of organized crime to be peaceful, this is not usually the case; terrorists typically use violent methods.
What is the root of terrorism?Terrorism is a tactic that both people and organizations support because it may be used as a kind of asymmetric warfare to force a government to comply with demands. In order to stop additional violence, frighten a group of people into following the requests. gain attention and, as a result, political backing for a cause.
Learn more about Terrorism: https://brainly.com/question/8949816
#SPJ1
_________ are groups of criminals who band together to commit many different types of crime.
O A. Organized crime networks
O B. Cybercriminals
O C. Human traffickers
O D. Terrorists
What is the best Rebuttal for
children who commited murder(
Debate you are in opposing team)
The best Rebuttal for children who commited murder is to consider the causes of the murder as well as rehabilitating the child
What is Juvenile delinquency?Juvenile delinquency can as well be considered as the juvenile offending which is the act of participating in unlawful behavior even though they are still considered minor.
It should be noted that In the United States of America, a juvenile delinquent serves as one that commits a crime and is under a specific age which could be murder however they can be transferred to the juvenile justice system so as to rehabilitate them.
Learn more about murder at:
https://brainly.com/question/27854072
#SPJ1
Which of the following is NOT a purpose or function of the Judicial Branch?
A) To determine if a new law is constitutional
B) To insure that trails and hearings are conducted fairly and appropriately
C) To review appeals from lower courts
D) All of the above are functions of the Judicial Branch
D) All of the above are functions of the Judicial Branch is NOT a purpose or function of the Judicial Branch.
What is Judicial Branch?
The Judicial Branch of government is responsible for interpreting the law and administering justice in the United States. Its primary functions include interpreting the Constitution and other laws, deciding on the constitutionality of laws, hearing and deciding cases, and reviewing appeals from lower courts. The Judicial Branch ensures that the rights and liberties of individuals and groups are protected and that the law is applied fairly and impartially.
All of the listed functions (determining the constitutionality of laws, ensuring fair trials and hearings, and reviewing appeals from lower courts) are purposes or functions of the Judicial Branch.
What are the laws?
Laws are rules and regulations that are established by a governing authority, such as a government or legal system, to govern the behavior of individuals and organizations within a society. These rules are typically enforced through various means, including sanctions and punishments, to ensure compliance and maintain order.
Laws can take various forms, such as statutes, regulations, common law, and international treaties, and can cover a wide range of topics, including criminal law, civil law, contract law, property law, and administrative law. They may be created through a democratic process, such as the enactment of legislation by a legislative body, or through judicial decisions, such as those made by a court interpreting existing laws.
To know more about Judicial Branch, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2232846
#SPJ1
The main goal of the Criminal Law Reform Project is to change policies _____________________.
around sentencing to help reduce the number of people in prisons
which clarify the civil rights of a person accused of a crime
that define crime so that it is limited to violent acts
to ensure that all rights are automatically restored
The main goal of the Criminal Law Reform Project is to change policies around sentencing to help reduce the number of people in prisons. Thus, option A is correct.
The national ACLU has a division called the Law Enforcement Reform Project. The Criminal Code Reform Project, which was born out as the Drug Regulation Reform Project in 2010, works to abolish too strict criminal justice regulations that lead to mass confinement and imprisonment and get in the way of establishing a legitimate, equal, and humanitarian society.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
15. How did the 14th amendment affect “states' rights?”
Answer: The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, significantly altered the relationship between the federal government and state governments in the United States. It was primarily intended to grant citizenship rights to all individuals born or naturalized in the U.S. and to protect them from state infringement of those rights.
The 14th Amendment significantly curtailed "states' rights" by granting the federal government greater power to ensure the protection of the constitutional rights of all citizens, particularly in the area of civil rights. Section 1 of the amendment declares that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
The 14th Amendment also empowered the federal government to enforce the amendment's provisions through appropriate legislation. This meant that the federal government could take action against state governments that were violating the civil rights of their citizens, something that was not possible under previous interpretations of the Constitution.
In essence, the 14th Amendment shifted power from the states to the federal government in matters of civil rights and individual liberties. It established a new relationship between the federal government and the states, with the federal government having a greater role in protecting individual rights and enforcing civil rights laws.
Answer: The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, significantly altered the relationship between the federal government and state governments in the United States. It was primarily intended to grant citizenship rights to all individuals born or naturalized in the U.S. and to protect them from state infringement of those rights.
The 14th Amendment significantly curtailed "states' rights" by granting the federal government greater power to ensure the protection of the constitutional rights of all citizens, particularly in the area of civil rights. Section 1 of the amendment declares that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
The 14th Amendment also empowered the federal government to enforce the amendment's provisions through appropriate legislation. This meant that the federal government could take action against state governments that were violating the civil rights of their citizens, something that was not possible under previous interpretations of the Constitution.
In essence, the 14th Amendment shifted power from the states to the federal government in matters of civil rights and individual liberties. It established a new relationship between the federal government and the states, with the federal government having a greater role in protecting individual rights and enforcing civil rights laws.
Once a candidate is accepted into the Secret Service, he or she must complete which of the following?
A. 10-week criminal investigator training program
B. 10-week special agent training course
C. 18-week criminal investigator analysis program
D. 18-week crime scene analysis course
Once a candidate is accepted into the Secret Service, he or she must complete a B. 10-week special agent training course.
What happens when a person enters the Secret Service ?The Special Agent Training Course (SATC) is a rigorous program designed to prepare candidates for the demands of working in the Secret Service.
The 10-week course includes classroom instruction, physical training, and practical exercises designed to develop a range of skills and knowledge required for the job. Topics covered in the training program include firearms proficiency, defensive tactics, criminal investigations, protective operations, and more.
Find out more on the Secret Service at https://brainly.com/question/16979419
#SPJ1
Once a candidate is accepted into the Secret Service, he or she must complete a B. 10-week special agent training course.
What happens when a person enters the Secret Service ?The Special Agent Training Course (SATC) is a rigorous program designed to prepare candidates for the demands of working in the Secret Service.
The 10-week course includes classroom instruction, physical training, and practical exercises designed to develop a range of skills and knowledge required for the job. Topics covered in the training program include firearms proficiency, defensive tactics, criminal investigations, protective operations, and more.
Find out more on the Secret Service at https://brainly.com/question/16979419
#SPJ1
WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
Which is riskier, a single-resource economy or a diversified economy, and why?
A. A single-resource economy is riskier because the resource may be expensive.
B. A diversified economy is riskier because the prices of goods may change.
C. A diversified economy is riskier because other producers may provide stiff competition.
D. A single-resource economy is riskier because the resource may run out.
The answer to the question "Which is riskier, a single-resource economy or a diversified economy, and why?" is option D. A single-resource economy is riskier because the resource may run out. In a single-resource economy, the economy is based on a single product or commodity that generates the majority of its revenues.
These economies are known for their dependence on natural resources like oil, gas, minerals, agricultural goods, and so on. Single-resource economies, on the other hand, are more prone to external economic shocks than diversified economies. If the price of a commodity drops, the economy may suffer a major blow, resulting in job losses, economic hardship, and an economic recession.
Furthermore, single-resource economies are vulnerable to natural disasters, political instability, and climate change, which can have a significant impact on their production levels. Furthermore, a single-resource economy can exhaust its resources, rendering it unable to sustain its economy over time. On the other hand, a diversified economy is less vulnerable to economic fluctuations and external shocks because it is based on a wide range of goods and services.
As a result, it is less likely to suffer significant damage if one commodity's price falls. Because they aren't dependent on a single commodity, diversified economies can quickly adapt to changes in market demand and economic conditions. Therefore the correct option is D
Know more about single-resource economy here:
https://brainly.com/question/23547241
#SPJ8
This chapter discusses that drug use can have both positive and negative results, depending on how it is used and why. Do you think a drug that is currently illegal but is found to have some positive results in the medical field should be completely
outlawed for any type of use? Think of heroin or cocaine, it is illegal to use or possess in the U.S. but if something positive could come from the use do you think it should be allowed. Explain your answer. 2 cited sources.
I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, but I can provide a balanced perspective on the topic. The question of whether a currently illegal drug with potential medical benefits should be completely outlawed for any type of use is a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach.
On one hand, it is important to consider the potential benefits that such drugs can have in the medical field. For example, studies have shown that heroin-assisted treatment can be an effective option for treating opioid addiction (Kerr et al., 2017). Similarly, cocaine has been used as a local anesthetic in eye surgery and is still used in some countries for that purpose (Narvaez, 2014). Banning the use of these drugs outright may prevent patients from receiving effective treatment for their medical conditions.
On the other hand, legalizing drugs with a history of abuse and addiction carries significant risks. It may lead to increased availability, misuse, and addiction, especially among vulnerable populations such as teenagers and low-income individuals. Additionally, drug legalization may send the wrong message to society that drug use is acceptable and may lead to an increase in crime rates, accidents, and public health costs.
In conclusion, while the potential medical benefits of currently illegal drugs should be considered, the risks of legalization should also be carefully evaluated. A thorough analysis of the benefits and risks, as well as the potential impact on public health and safety, should guide any decision regarding drug policy.