Answer:
Manila
Explanation:
i just searched it :)
Why were Americans fearful of a strong central government?
Answer:
Feared they would abuse the rights of the people
Explanation:
After we gained our independence from Great Britain, we feared that the country would fall under the same fate as it did under British rule, which would have made the American Revolution pointless. We didn't want America to fall under tyranny or for the government to abuse the rights of the people.
The states wanted their own power to help avoid another situation like King George III having absolute power.
why did the safavids use both silver and copper coins?
Answer:
Silver coins, such as the one pictured were used by the government to pay administrative costs, by merchants to pay for goods purchased in large trade deals, and by some people to pay taxes. Soldiers and the urban lower class used copper coins. ... Even so, trade with Europe was not easy.
Explanation:
none sorry
What was the result of the French and Indian War? (2.03 Quiz: We Hold These Truths)
A) The British won and acquired Canada and all the land as far west as the Mississippi.
B) The French lost the war and had to give up their territory west of the Mississippi.
C) The Indians lost all their territory and were pushed west of the Mississippi.
D) The French won and expanded their territory northward all the way into Canada.
Answer:
A) The British won and acquired Canada and all the land as far west as the Mississippi.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
What challenges did Muhammad face as he tried to share the messages of Allah (received via the angel Gabriel) to his fellow countrymen and women?
Based on historical perspective and some hadiths, the challenges Muhammad faced as he tried to share the messages of Allah (received via the angel Gabriel) to his fellow countrymen and women were his "inability to read and write."
Who was Muhammad in Islam?Muhammad is the famous Prophet of Islam. He was known to begin receiving revelation from Angel Gabriel in 609 CE on Mount Hira, near Mecca.
Muhammad at the time was known. I lacked formal education or the ability to read and write. Therefore, he had to memorize the revelation and recite the content to his people.
However, to make it easier, Muhammad would need to write it down and read it to the people, a situation which was a challenge to him.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "inability to read and write."
Learn more about Prophet Muhammad here: https://brainly.com/question/2420836
What community behaviours can be recognised in some animals?
Answer:
Rabies
Explanation:
Was locating a manufacturing facility in the United States a hood business move for Kia
Locating a manufacturing facility in the United States is a good business move for Kia as it helps in saving costs in exporting the goods and is beneficial in receiving business benefits provided by the government.
What is business?Business is a term used to describe an economic activity in which commodities and services are exchanged with the aid of purchasing and selling with the intention of making a profit.
KMC is showing its commitment to our capacity to significantly increase sales in the North American market by choosing to develop a production facility here in the United States.
Deciding on the location of where to put your future manufacturing facility can be challenging, and doing your research is important. The price of electricity and the provider's dependability are the first things to be taken into account.
Learn more about Business, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ2
Which of the following shows the correct order of events?
Catt’s “Winning Plan,” suffrage in some Western states, the Nineteenth Amendment
suffrage in some Western states, the Nineteenth Amendment, Catt’s “Winning Plan”
suffrage in some Western states, Catt’s “Winning Plan,” the Nineteenth Amendment
Catt’s “Winning Plan,” the Nineteenth Amendment, suffrage in some Western states
The correct order of the following events is D. suffrage in some Western states, Catt’s “Winning Plan,” the Nineteenth Amendment.
What was Catt's Winning Plan about?Catt's "Winning Plan" was about women's suffrage, which commenced in western states. Then at the NAWSA's September 1916 Convention in Atlantic City, Catt's “winning plan” was unveiled.
Wyoming became the first western state to grant women suffrage in 1890, followed by Colorado in 1893.
On June 4, 1919, after its ratification on August 18, 1920, the 19th amendment granted women suffrage.
Thus, the correct order of the events about women's suffrage is Option D.
Learn more about women's suffrage at https://brainly.com/question/8862360
Answer:The correct order of the following events is D. suffrage in some Western states, Catt’s “Winning Plan,” the Nineteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
i did the test
Explain the geographic context for the historical development/event shown in this photograph.
Plz help me before 10:00 PM
what are 8 steps in order for the federal government to make a law
Answer:
1 Laws begin as an idea of a Senator or Representative. He/she produces a rough draft of the plan and sponsors it, which makes it a bill.
2 The bill then goes to whichever legislative branch (Senate or House) the Senator or Representative belongs for study.
3 If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended.
4 If the bill passes by a simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate.
5 In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill.
6 A conference committee made of House and Senate members works out any differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval.
7 The Government Printing Office prints the revised bill in a process called enrolling. The bill then goes to the President.
8 The President has ten days to sign or veto the enrolled bill.
Explanation:
What s the supreme law of the land?
Answer:
Explanation:This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any ...
Article VI Section 2 | Constitution Annotated
What is the Supreme Law of the Land in the United
States?
A. The Articles of Confederation
B. The United States Constitution
C. The Declaration of Independence
D. The Collection of Natural Rights and
Responsibilities
Answer:
B. The United States Constitution
Explanation:
In article 6, the Constitution states that it's the "supreme law of the land." This is the basis of the US legal system. Actually, in contrast to the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution was feared to give too much power to the national government.
what woman was born an African American abolitionist and woman rights activist but could not read or write but was a talented public speaker
Answer:
Sojourner Truth was an African American evangelist, abolitionist, women's rights activist and author who was born into slavery before escaping to freedom in 1826.
СС
P
b
Peter the Great sought to build a
great, powerful state by using
customs, manners, and
technology from somewhere else.
How did this approach differ from
that used by Louis XIV in France?
d
F
The difference between Louis XVI and Peter I is that Peter introduced Westernization to Russia, while Louis failed in his attempt to evolve the monarchy of France.
Peter I (1672-1725) was a Russian ruler who ruled between 1682 - 1696. During this period he stood out for belonging to the Romanov Dynasty and implementing a process of modernization through Westernization and expansion that transformed Russia into an of the main European powers.
On the other hand, Louis XVI of France (1754 - 1793) was the last king of monarchical France. He stood out because he wanted to implement government reforms in France such as:
Abolish servitudeElimination of property taxObligation to work without pay for the feudal lordIncreased tolerance towards non-Catholics andAbolition of the death penalty for deserters.However, these measures caused rejection in the middle and upper class. Later on, his support for the Americans in the war of independence against the United Kingdom caused a waste of money that was evidenced in a wide famine and social discontent that led to the abolition of the monarchy and to be sentenced to death in the guillotine
According to the above, it can be inferred that both rulers had different governments because PeTER was one of the most prominent rulers of Russia, while Louis unleashed an economic crisis that affected his government and led to the abolition of the monarchy.
Learn more about Louis XVI in: https://brainly.com/question/1719168
Why is it important to have a research plan?
It identifies the daim
It evaluates the argument
It provides secondary questions,
It guides the collection of information,
Plz hurry
Answer:
It guides the collection of Information
Explanation:
Having a research plan allows you to know what information is important to collect and how to use that information in your paper.
Answer: The answer is (D)It guides the collection of information
I hope this helped
Explanation:
Answer the question to get brainliest
Which statements are accurate about Queen Elizabeth I?
She was the daughter of Henry VIII and was the second queen of England to rule.
She commissioned Francis Drake and Sir Walter Raleigh to explore the New World and seek out opportunities for English trade and settlement.
The Elizabethan Age refers to the period when she was the reigning queen.
She declared England a Catholic nation and made the pope the head of the church.
She did everything she could to improve relations between England and Spain.
Answer:
Explanation:
<3
WWII was considered a direct result of ________
Answer:
The turmoil left behind by ww1
Explanation:
Answer:the turmoil left behind by World War 1
Explanation:
the girl threw the clay balls into the bucket of water
what are some specific issue in one of the social science disciplines?
Answer:
Various discipline of social science
Usually included within the social sciences are cultural (or social) anthropology, sociology, psychology, political science, and economics. The discipline of historiography is regarded by many as a social science, and certain areas of historical study are almost indistinguishable from work done in the social sciences
Explanation:
Your welcome have a nice day
Constitutional Democracy: Federalism:Question 8
Medicinal marijuana is thought to belong under state control by some
people because of which of the following?
Select one
Article 1, Sections 9 and 10
elastic clause
supremacy clause
Tenth Amendment
commerce clause
Answer:
Article 1, Sections 9 and 10
Explanation:
Question 1: Abraham Lincoln is considered one of our greatest presidents. Explain what Lincoln did as president to earn this reputation. Look at the picture to see what has to be include. ( Whoever answers correctly and is honest with there answer will get brainliest and 5 ⭐ . Extremely Need Help Please and Thank You.
Answer:
He was the first president to win re-election since Andrew Jackson. Abraham Lincoln faced a divided Union. Separated between the pro-slavery South and the abolitionist North. He led a deeply divided country into the Civil War.
Four important leaders helped guide the Constitutional Convention in 1787: Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington. Identify which leader each description refers to.
Answer:
I think that it is the first, third and four answers
pls help meh asap!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
serving jury duty is the answer
Answer:
Serving on a jury
what can you do to keep our republic healthy for the century to come?
Answer:
While today we marvel at the extraordinary accomplishment of our Founding Fathers, their own reaction to the US Constitution when it was presented to them for their signatures was considerably less enthusiastic. Benjamin Franklin, ever the optimist even at the age of 81, gave what was for him a remarkably restrained assessment in his final speech before the Constitutional Convention: "…when you assemble a number of men to have the advantage of their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those men, all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests, and their selfish views." He thought it impossible to expect a "perfect production" from such a gathering, but he believed that the Constitution they had just drafted, "with all its faults," was better than any alternative that was likely to emerge.
Nearly all of the delegates harbored objections, but persuaded by Franklin's logic, they put aside their misgivings and affixed their signatures to it. Their over-riding concern was the tendency in nearly all parts of the young country toward disorder and disintegration. Americans had used the doctrine of popular sovereignty--"democracy"--as the rationale for their successful rebellion against English authority in 1776. But they had not yet worked out fully the question that has plagued all nations aspiring to democratic government ever since: how to implement principles of popular majority rule while at the same time preserving stable governments that protect the rights and liberties of all citizens.
Few believed that a new federal constitution alone would be sufficient to create a unified nation out of a collection of independent republics spread out over a vast physical space, extraordinarily diverse in their economic interests, regional loyalties, and ethnic and religious attachments. And there would be new signs of disorder after 1787 that would remind Americans what an incomplete and unstable national structure they had created: settlers in western Pennsylvania rebelled in 1794 because of taxes on their locally distilled whiskey; in western North Carolina there were abortive attempts to create an independent republic of "Franklin" which would ally itself with Spain to insure its independence from the United States; there was continued conflict with Indians across the whole western frontier and increased fear of slave unrest, particularly when news of the slave-led revolution in Haiti reached American shores.
But as fragile as America's federal edifice was at the time of the founding, there was much in the culture and environment that contributed to a national consensus and cohesion: a common language; a solid belief in the principles of English common law and constitutionalism; a widespread commitment (albeit in diverse forms) to the Protestant religion; a shared revolutionary experience; and, perhaps most important, an economic environment which promised most free, white Americans if not great wealth, at least an independent sufficiency.
The American statesmen who succeeded those of the founding generation served their country with a self-conscious sense that the challenges of maintaining a democratic union were every bit as great after 1787 as they were before. Some aspects of their nation-building program--their continuing toleration of slavery and genocidal policies toward American Indians--are fit objects of national shame, not honor. But statesmen of succeeding generations--Lincoln foremost among them--would continue the quest for a "more perfect union."
Such has been our success in building a powerful and cohesive democratic nation-state in post-Civil War America that most Americans today assume that principles of democracy and national harmony somehow naturally go hand-in-hand. But as we look around the rest of the world in the post-Soviet era, we find ample evidence that democratic revolutions do not inevitably lead to national harmony or universal justice. We see that the expression of the "popular will" can create a cacophony of discordant voices, leaving many baffled about the true meaning of majority rule. In far too many places around the world today, the expression of the "popular will" is nothing more than the unleashing of primordial forces of tribal and religious identity which further confound the goal of building stable and consensual governments.
Write an essay, Is immigration good or bad for the nation?
Answer:
good
Explanation:
in fact, immigrants help grow the economy
How did Theodore Roosevelt affect the progressive movement?
What did delegates for a strong national government believe?
Answer:
The delegates for a strong national government believed that a strong national government would endanger the rights of states. The delegates for stronger state governments believed that a strong national government would threaten individual liberty.
Explanation:
how did theodore roosevelt use his inherent powers?
Answer:
He vigorously promoted the conservation movement, emphasizing efficient use of natural resources. He dramatically expanded the system of national parks and national forests. After 1906, he moved to the left, attacking big business, proposing a welfare state, and supporting labor unions.
Explanation:
What important things did Theodore Roosevelt do during his presidency?
His presidency saw the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act, which established the Food and Drug Administration to regulate food safety, and the Hepburn Act, which increased the regulatory power of the Interstate Commerce Commission.
What loopholes existed in the 18th Amendment? *
Answer:
The biggest loophole was that neither the Eighteenth Amendment nor the Volstead Act made it illegal to drink or be drunk in public. Farmers who grew fruit quickly learned to sell their harvests in dehydrated bricks. The warning label included instructions on how to easily turn the bricks into alcoholic drinks.
. What would be the impact of the two novels on the Filipinos? How did they see things such as
a. abusive members of the clergy
b. the state of education to the University of Santo Tomas
c. how government operates
The impact of the two novels is to show how the government operates, as shown in option c.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Both novels focus on Filipinos' lives amid Spanish rule.In this case, the author shows how the country was subjugated and exploited by a foreign government that did not consider building a good future for the Filipinos.The two novels reinforce how uncertain the future is and how the way the government acts makes this uncertainty even greater and more difficult to bear.Thus, the novels have a great impact, as readers can recognize the way they live and how this is being modified and denigrated by the Spanish government.
The two novels the question refers to are "The Social Cancer" and "Reign of Greed" by Jose Rizal.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/481861?referrer=searchResults
I can never find what I'm looking for anymore, people are always saying abc's and telling different answers I need some real help.
Answer:
sry to hear that man
Explanation: