Write the equation of the circle.
Circle C that passes through (-5, 1) with center C(1,-4).

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

i need points

In 1945, the concern which the Allies had about invading the Japanese mainland with ground forces was:

This refers to a military tactic where the armed forces of a country or a place go into enemy territory with the aim of defeating the troops and claiming the territory.

With this in mind and from the events in history, we can see that after the bombing of Pearl Harbor by the Japanese Navy, there were concern by the Allies of invading the Japanese mainland with ground forces because they feared the great loss of life.

Read more about Pearl Harbor here:

https://brainly.com/question/860420

It will take the new guy approximately 3.33 hours to finish your car.To find out how long it will take the new mechanic to finish the car, we need to consider their individual rates of work.

Let's denote the first mechanic's rate as "M1" (job per hour) and the new guy's rate as "M2" (job per hour).

We are given that M1 can complete the job in six hours, so his rate of work is 1/6 of the job per hour. Similarly, the new guy takes eight hours to complete the job, so his rate of work is 1/8 of the job per hour.

When they worked together for the first two hours, they combined their rates of work. So in the first two hours, they completed (2/6 + 2/8) of the job.

Now, the first mechanic leaves and only the new guy is left to finish the remaining portion of the job. Let's denote the time it takes for the new guy to complete the remaining portion as "T."

Since we know the portion of the job completed in the first two hours, we can set up the equation: (2/6 + 2/8) + (T/8) = 1.

Simplifying the equation, we have (8/24 + 6/24) + (T/8) = 1.

Combining the fractions, we get 14/24 + (T/8) = 1.

Subtracting 14/24 from both sides, we have T/8 = 10/24.

Simplifying further, we find T = (10/24) * 8 = 3.33 hours.

For more such questions on rates

https://brainly.com/question/25720319

#SPJ8

Answer: 12.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

i dunno for sure so probably use someone elses answer

16 because o.25 times 16 = 4

1.76+2.29=4.05 so 16

Answer:

16.

Step-by-step explanation:

0.25 × 16 = 4

1.76 + 2.29 = 4.05

so the answer is 16

hope this helps!

~mina-san

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

g(x)=[x-4]                     h(x)= [x] -5

                                     h= -5

g=[x-4]

x     x

g=4                      

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

(1) The explanation is given below.

(2) The value of the test statistic is 2.5.

(3) The rejection criterion based on the critical value approach 1.664$$.

(4) The explanation is given below.

1. Null Hypothesis:H0: µ = 150Alternative Hypothesis:H1: µ > 1502. Test statistic value:We know that, the sample size is greater than 30, which means the sample mean is approximately normally distributed. Now, we need to calculate the test statistic value. The formula for calculating the test statistic value is given by,$$t = \frac{{\left( {{\bar x} - \mu } \right)}}{{\left( {\frac{s}{{\sqrt n }}} \right)}}$$Substituting the given values, we get,$$t = \frac{{\left( {165 - 150} \right)}}{{\left( {\frac{{54}}{{\sqrt {81} }}} \right)}}$$Simplifying the above expression, we get,$$t = \frac{{15}}{{\frac{{54}}{{9}}}}$$$$t =

2.5$$Therefore, the value of the test statistic is 2.5.

3. Rejection criterion based on the critical value approach: The rejection criterion based on the critical value approach is given by$$t > t_{\alpha ,\,df}$$where$α = 0.05$and$df = n - 1 = 81 - 1 = 80$. Now, we need to find the critical value corresponding to 80 degrees of freedom at a 5% level of significance. Using the t-distribution table with 80 degrees of freedom, we get$$t_{0.05, 80} = 1.664$$Therefore, the rejection criterion is$$t > t_{\alpha, df}$$$$\Rightarrow t > 1.664$$

4. Statistical decision: As the calculated value of the test statistic (t = 2.5) is greater than the critical value (t = 1.664), we reject the null hypothesis i.e., we can conclude that the average internet usage in Philadelphia city is significantly greater than the U.S. average. Hence, we can say that the Statistical decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

To know more about Statistical visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15525560

#SPJ11

We reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the average usage in Philadelphia city is significantly greater than the U.S. average.

1. The null and alternative hypotheses are given below:

Null hypothesis, H0: µ ≤ 150 (Average daily internet use in Philadelphia city is less than or equal to 150 minutes).

Alternative hypothesis, H1: µ > 150 (Average daily internet use in Philadelphia city is greater than 150 minutes)

2. The value of the test statistic is calculated below: t=(x¯−μ)/(s/√n)

Here, x¯ = 165

µ = 150

s = 54

n = 81t

= (165 - 150)/(54/√81)

= 2.50.

Thus, the value of the test statistic is 2.50.

3. The rejection criterion based on the critical value approach is obtained below:

The critical value for α = 0.05 with 80 degrees of freedom is 1.664.

The rejection criterion is t > 1.664.

4. The statistical decision is made by comparing the calculated t-value with the critical value.

If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Here, the calculated t-value is 2.50, which is greater than the critical value of 1.664.

Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the average usage in Philadelphia city is significantly greater than the U.S. average.

To know more about null hypothesis , visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/4436370

#SPJ11

The airline can say with 95% confidence that the maximum error in using x = 24.15 minutes as an estimate of the true average time is 24.736.

To calculate the confidence interval, we used the following formula:

CI = x ± z × SE.

CI is the confidence interval

x is the sample mean

z is the z-score for the desired confidence level (in this case, 95%)

SE is the standard error of the mean

The z-score for a 95% confidence interval is 1.95. ⇒ 0.05/2 = 0.025 = 1.95.

the sample standard deviation is 3.29 and the sample size is 120.

Therefore

CI = 24.15 + 1.95 × 3.29 / √(120) = 24.736

Find more exercises on confidence level;

https://brainly.com/question/22851322

#SPJ1

By Performing the following test of hypothesis, H0 is rejected.

To perform the test of hypothesis, we compare the sample mean (x) to the hypothesized population mean (μ) and consider the sample size (n) and sample standard deviation (s).

Given:

H0: μ = 285 (null hypothesis)

H1: μ < 285 (alternative hypothesis)

n = 55 (sample size)

x = 266.89 (sample mean)

s = ?

To determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, we calculate the test statistic and compare it to the critical value or p-value.

Since the standard deviation (s) is not given, we cannot directly calculate the test statistic. Without the value of s, we cannot proceed with the hypothesis test. Please provide the value of s to continue with the calculation and draw a conclusion.

The test of hypothesis cannot be performed without the value of the sample standard deviation (s). Please provide the necessary information to proceed with the calculation and draw a conclusion.

To know more about test of hypothesis, visit

https://brainly.com/question/15980493

#SPJ11

Answer:

24 cm long

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.03333333333 = 33/1000 = 3.3%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

30

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

114

Step-by-step explanation:

You would add 46 degree and 20 degrees (66) and subtract (180 - 66 = ?) to get your answer.

Answer:

114

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

25%

Since it's 2 in a row, it is divided by 4

technically it depends on the way you flip the coin, its mostly a 50-50

a more answer-y answer to this would be around (heads) 65-35 (tails) in my opinion.

Answer:

The polynomial must be added by 2.25 on each side of the equation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let [tex]x^{2}-3\cdot x +20 = 0[/tex], we need to add each side by 2.25 to complete the square, that is, expanding the polynomial so that factor of a perfect square trinomial can be done:

1) [tex]x^{2}-3\cdot x +20 = 0[/tex] Given

2) [tex](x^{2}-3\cdot x +20) +2.25 = 2.25 + 0[/tex] Compatibility with addition/Commutative property

3) [tex](x^{2}-3\cdot x +2.25) +20 = 2.25[/tex] Commutative, associative and modulative properties.

4) [tex](x-1.5)^{2} +20 = 2.25[/tex] Perfect square trinomial/Result

Answer:

(x−21​)^2=81/4

Answer:

the answer is B.........................

Answer:

69

Step-by-step explanation:

lol

Answer:

[tex]-22\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]a=\frac{1}{3} , b = -10, c = -3[/tex]

change  [tex]b^{2} - 9a^{2} + c[/tex]   to  

[tex]-10 -9\frac{1}{3} + (-3)[/tex]

=

[tex]-22\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

Answer:

x=20

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that a line is 180 degrees, and the base of the cemi-circle is a line. So,  we would have:

x+7x+x=180

9x=180

x=20

Hope this helps!!

Answer:

x = 20

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 7x + x = 180

9x = 180

x = 20

(a) Type I error: Rejecting the claim , Type II error: Failing to reject the claim. (b) Type I error: Rejecting the claim, Type II error: Failing to reject the claim.

For claim (a):

Type I error: Rejecting the claim that the average time customers wait on hold is less than 5 minutes when, in fact, it is true. This means concluding that the average wait time is longer than 5 minutes when it is not.

Type II error: Failing to reject the claim that the average time customers wait on hold is less than 5 minutes when, in fact, it is false. This means concluding that the average wait time is less than 5 minutes when it is actually longer.

For claim (b):

Type I error: Rejecting the claim that the number of salespeople employed at a car lot is linearly correlated with the annual profit of the lot when, in fact, it is true. This means concluding that there is no linear correlation between the number of salespeople and annual profit when there actually is.

Type II error: Failing to reject the claim that the number of salespeople employed at a car lot is linearly correlated with the annual profit of the lot when, in fact, it is false. This means concluding that there is a linear correlation between the number of salespeople and annual profit when there actually isn't.

Learn more about correlation here:

https://brainly.com/question/16206377

#SPJ11

Answer:

If they hadn't stopped at the gas station and had driven along the diagonal path, their trip would have been 12 miles shorter.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that Gigi's Family left their house and drove 14 miles south to a gas station and then 48 miles east to a waterpark, to determine how much shorter would their trip to the waterpark have been if they hadn't stopped at the gas station and had driven along the diagonal path instead the following calculation must be performed, using the Pythagorean theorem:

14 ^ 2 + 48 ^ 2 = X ^ 2

196 + 2,304 = X ^ 2

√ 2500 = X

50 = X

14 + 48 - 50 = X

62 - 50 = X

Thus, if they hadn't stopped at the gas station and had driven along the diagonal path, their trip would have been 12 miles shorter.

a)Error:multiplied the numerator and denominator by 3 instead of 2.

b)The correct answer to the given expression is 8/15.

In the given image, Sadie made an error in the simplification of the expression.

The error is that she multiplied the numerator and denominator by 3 instead of 2.

She simplified the numerator and the denominator before carrying out multiplication by 2.

This resulted in the final answer being incorrect.

The correct answer would be 8/5.

The correct way to simplify the expression is as follows:

[tex]$$\frac{4}{3} \div \frac{5}{6} = \frac{4}{3} \times \frac{6}{5}$$[/tex]

Now, cross-cancelling can be performed because the numerator of the first fraction and the denominator of the second fraction have a common factor of 2.

[tex]$$=\frac{4 \times 2}{3 \times 5} = \frac{8}{15}$$[/tex]

Therefore, the correct answer to the given expression is 8/15.

To know more about expression, visit:

brainly.com/question/17621214

#SPJ11

Answer:

D and E

Step-by-step explanation:

remote interior angles are not adjacent to a given angle. or basically 1 is our exterior angle, so the opposites of 1 and the remote interior angle.

The remote interior angles of Z1 are ∠4 and ∠3. The correct options are D and E.

A triangle's remote interior angles are the two angles that are not adjacent to a given exterior angle. An exterior angle of a triangle is formed by extending one of the triangle's sides.

The following theorem can be used to calculate the remote interior angles of a triangle:

A triangle's remote interior angles are equal in size to the exterior angle that is not adjacent to them.

In other words, if we know the measure of one of a triangle's exterior angles, we can find the measure of the distant interior angles by subtracting that measure from 180 degrees.

Thus, the correct options are D and E.

For more details regarding angles, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28451077

#SPJ7

To determine if f has an inverse, we need to check if it is bijective (both injective and surjective). Since f is not injective, it cannot have an inverse.

To determine whether the function f: R^2 -> R^2 given by (x, y) -> (3x + 2y, 7x + 5y) is injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto), we need to analyze its properties.

Injectivity:
A function f: A -> B is injective if for every pair of distinct elements in A, their corresponding images in B are also distinct. In other words, if f(x) = f(y), then x = y.

Let's consider two distinct points in R^2: (x1, y1) and (x2, y2). If f(x1, y1) = f(x2, y2), we have:

(3x1 + 2y1, 7x1 + 5y1) = (3x2 + 2y2, 7x2 + 5y2)

By comparing the corresponding components, we get the following system of equations:

3x1 + 2y1 = 3x2 + 2y2 (Equation 1)
7x1 + 5y1 = 7x2 + 5y2 (Equation 2)

We can subtract Equation 1 from Equation 2 to eliminate the variables:

7x1 + 5y1 - (3x1 + 2y1) = 7x2 + 5y2 - (3x2 + 2y2)
4x1 + 3y1 = 4x2 + 3y2

Rearranging the equation gives:

4x1 - 4x2 = 3y2 - 3y1
4(x1 - x2) = 3(y2 - y1)

Since this equation holds for any values of x1, x2, y1, and y2, it implies that the difference in the x-coordinates must be the same as the difference in the y-coordinates for any two distinct points. However, this is not always true, indicating that f is not injective. Therefore, the function is not one-to-one.

Surjectivity:
A function f: A -> B is surjective if every element in the codomain B has a preimage in the domain A. In other words, for every element b in B, there exists an element a in A such that f(a) = b.

To determine surjectivity, we need to find whether there exists an (x, y) in R^2 such that f(x, y) = (a, b) for any (a, b) in R^2.

Let's take an arbitrary point (a, b) in R^2. We need to find an (x, y) such that:

(3x + 2y, 7x + 5y) = (a, b)

This gives us a system of equations:

3x + 2y = a (Equation 3)
7x + 5y = b (Equation 4)

We have two equations with two variables, which can be solved to find the values of x and y. Since the system has a unique solution for every (a, b) in R^2, we can conclude that f is surjective.

Inverse:
To determine if f has an inverse, we need to check if it is bijective (both injective and surjective). Since f is not injective, it cannot have an inverse.

In summary:

The function f: R^2 -> R^2 given by (x, y) -> (3x + 2y, 7x.

Visit to know more about Injective:-

brainly.com/question/5614233

#SPJ11

Answer:

0.625

Step-by-step explanation:

25 divided by 40= 0.625 percent