Can someone list the 3 major differences (8th grade social studies)

Answer:

Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional with respect to the United States Constitution (as opposed to the state's own constitution).

Answer:

Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional with respect to the United States Constitution (as opposed to the state's own constitution).

Given that it spoke to people, Martin Luther's "I Have a Dream" speech had the greatest impact on the world. It's raw and real, and it was very relatable. He accomplished the enactment of civil rights, and we will remember him for it.

King had been largely responsible over the enactment of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The Civil Rights Act prohibited workplace and public accommodations discrimination based on "race, colour, religion, or national origin." The voting rights legislation protects the right of African Americans to vote.

The civil rights movement eventually won victories under Martin Luther's leadership, with the passing of the Civil Rights Act in 1964 as well as the Voting Rights Act to 1965.

Learn more about Martin Luther, here:

https://brainly.com/question/878248

#SPJ2

Answer:

On August 25, Politico, a political media outlet, reported that the Trump administration is considering labeling China's so-called "repression" of ethnic Muslim minority Uighurs in Xinjiang a "genocide". And If there's not enough consensus to use the term genocide, the administration would instead accuse China of "crimes against humanity" or "ethnic cleansing".

Explanation:

to view themselves as a cohesive unit and avoid political parties and issues a special warning to be wary of attachments and entanglements with other nations

Answer: The Rise of Global Inequality

Explanation:  The Industrial Revolution in Europe marked a momentous turning point in human history. Those regions of the world that industrialized in the nineteenth century (mainly Europe and North America) increased their wealth and power enormously in comparison to those that did not. A gap between the core industrializing regions and the soon-to-be colonized or semi-colonized regions outside the European-North American core (mainly in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America) emerged and widened throughout the nineteenth century. Moreover, this pattern of uneven global development became institutionalized or built into the structure of the world economy. Thus a "lopsided world" evolved a world with a rich north and poor south.

In recent years historical economists have charted the long-term evolution of this gap, and Figure 24.1 summarizes the findings of one important study. Three main points stand out. First, in 1750 the average standard of living was no higher in Europe as a whole than in the rest of the world. Second, it was industrialization that opened the gaps in average wealth and well-being among countries and regions. Third, income per person stagnated in the colonized world before 1913, in striking contrast to the industrializing regions. Only after 1945, in the era of decolonization and political independence, did former colonies make real economic progress, beginning in their turn the critical process of industrialization.

The rise of these enormous income disparities, which indicate similar and striking disparities in food and clothing, health and education, and life expectancy and general material well-being, has generated a great deal of debate. One school of interpretation stresses that the West used science, technology, capitalist organization, and even its rational worldview to create massive wealth, and then used that wealth and power to its advantage. Another school argues that the West used its political and economic power to steal much of the world's riches, continuing in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries the rapacious colonialism born of the era of expansion. Because these issues are complex and there are few simple answers, it is helpful to consider them in the context of world trade in the nineteenth century.

Answer:

The Kingdom of God" is primarily a temporal designation. It's not so much about a people, a place, or a principle - It's a timeframe, an age, an epoch. In the Jewish hope, the coming of the Kingdom Age would mean the ending of the current one. The coming of the Kingdom Age would mean the fulfillment of all of the OT promises. But Jesus modified the OT scheme to teach instead that the New Age had come in him, and the promises were fulfilled in him. But, in a surprising twist that he referred to as "the mystery of the kingdom," the old age had not yet passed away. The New Age began, but the Old Age didn't end. Thus, the two ages overlap, instead of coming right after one another. And we currently live in the “overlap” between the ages. We have shared Craig Blomberg’s chart to illustrate this.

Answer:

Winter Break 2020 was one of the worst and devastating Winter Break I ever experienced.

Answer:

stitching shoes was laborious, so matzeliger invented the sewing machine.

:)

Explanation:

Answer: Poor living conditions, poor working conditions, Low wages, and child Labor.

Explanation: Industrial towns contained many polluting factories.

Hope that helped :0

Answer:

C.) Spanish buildings were made from adobe

Explanation:

Adobe culture originates from Native Americans in New Mexico, it influenced the Spanish to build from Adobe.

hope i helped

Answer:

Alexander Hamilton

Explanation:

Cabinet battle #2

Answer: Thomas Jefferson

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer would be violent and conflict

Answer:lack of immunity of some disease

Explanation:

I just took it

Answer:

Massilia

Explanation:

He reconquered Massilia.

The 1920s were a period of optimism and prosperity – for some Americans.  When Herbert Hoover became President in 1929, the stock market was climbing to unprecedented levels, and some investors were taking advantage of low interest rates to buy stocks on credit, pushing prices even higher.  In October, 1929, the bubble burst, and in less than a week, the market dropped by almost half of its recent record highs.  Billions of dollars were lost, and thousands of investors were ruined.

After the stock market crash, President Hoover sought to prevent panic from spreading throughout the economy.  In November, he summoned business leaders to the White House and secured promises from them to maintain wages.  According to Hoover’s economic theory, financial losses should affect profits, not employment, thus maintaining consumer spending and shortening the downturn.  Hoover received commitments from private industry to spend $1.8 billion for new construction and repairs to be started in 1930, to stimulate employment.

The President ordered federal departments to speed up their construction projects and asked all governors to expand public works projects in their states. He asked Congress for a $160 million tax cut while doubling spending for public buildings, dams, highways, and harbors.

1930

Praise for the President’s intervention was widespread;  the New York Times commented, “No one in his place could have done more. Very few of his predecessors could have done as much.”  Together, government and business spent more in the first half of 1930 than in the entire previous year. Still consumers cut back their spending, which forced many businesses and manufacturers to reduce their output and lay off their workers.

In October 1930, with unemployment rising, Hoover created the President’s Emergency Committee for Employment (PECE) to coordinate state and local relief programs, and to develop methods for increasing employment in the private sector.  But with no direct control of funding for relief or jobs, PECE had only limited success.

As the Depression worsened, Hoover requested that the Federal Reserve increase credit, and he persuaded Congress to transfer agricultural surpluses from the Federal Farm Board to the Red Cross for distribution to relief agencies. Hoover asked Congress for even more spending on public works, and he continued to encourage states and private businesses to generate new jobs.

Answer:

Enslaved persons were too valuable for Southern leaders to consider emancipation.

Explanation:

"The plantation owners of the South, who were dependent on enslaved laborers, had much of their personal wealth tied up in enslaved persons."

and

Their value would be about $80,000 or $2.2mil today

Answer:

Enslaved persons were too valuable for Southern leaders to consider emancipation

Explanation:

B is wrong because many owners could actually afford them. C is wrong because though they were worth millions today, they weren't worth that much at the time. D is wrong because the passage doesn't talk/mention that. A is right because it says it in the passage, "The plantation owners of the South, who were dependent on enslaved laborers, had much of their personal wealth tied up in enslaved persons...50% of the wealth of the South was tied up in the institution of slavery, which is an important reason why so many Southern leaders were unwilling to discuss any type of emancipation."

Answer:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was compromise made during the Constitutional Convention in 1787 over the question of how slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for the purpose of representation in the Congress (i.e. how many seats the state would have in the House of Representatives)

Explanation:

Do follow and mark as brainliest too

Answer:

the right to vote and for everyone to be treated the same

Answer:

He wanted equlity for everyone

Explanation:

Answer:

Article III - Judicial Branch | The National Constitution Center.

Answer:

It was one of the worst breaks for me too because I was so stressed out about school I couldn't have fun.

Answer:

Having lost his control of the Caribbean landholding, Napoleon saw no further use for Louisiana. The US was only interested in the New Orleans area; however, the revolution enabled the sale of the entire territory west of the Mississippi River for around $15 million. This purchase more than doubled US territory.

:)

When people tink about the first people in America, they might think of Christopher Columbus or the European colonists; when, in fact, the first people were the Indians. The Cherokee Indians had lived in the lands of what is now the United States for thousands of years before any colonists had ventured over. Little did they know that the new nation that was going to be forming around them, would severely affect the lives of their descendents.

Life before the Trail of Tears but after the arrival of the new Americans was more or less simple for the Cherokees. They spend time hunting and fishing. Some of them even worked on plantations and even own their own slaves, in an effort to accommodate to some of the American ways of living.

hope its helps

Answer:

144 because of the turning point

Answer:

tommorow is depression day :0 lol jk its friday

Explanation:

Answer: An example is, the Voting Rights Act, an act of Congress, preempts state constitutions, and FDA regulations may preempt state court judgments in cases involving prescriptions.

Explanation:

Answer:

Hawaii had become an American territory during 1989 after the Spanish-American War.

Explanation:

Along with Manifest Destiny, after the war, the United States had made an unofficial empire in the Pacific. With the Philippines as its biggest colony, Hawaii was much closer to home therefore it was annexed. Hawaii held a geographical strategic value and eventually in the future would turn into an economically prosperous state.

Answer:

It is wrong because he is destroying food chains and animals lives.

Explanation: Morally what trump did was morally wrong poisoning multiple species and hurting the food chain because he his hurting other creatures and is eviormentally wrong because it destroys the wild life kills birds, penguins (technically a bird), kills fish which is a food source for multiple things in the artic.