Answer:
The answer is yes. Some actions involve both criminal and civil matters. For example, assault can be both a civil matter and a criminal matter. ... For example, a person who has intentionally killed another can be charged in criminal court with homicide and can also be sued civilly for wrongful death.
Explanation: (true)
Answer:
i think its true
Explanation i might be wrong
4. IF YOU HAVE AN ACCIDENT, YOU MUST EXCHANGE YOUR DRIVERS LICENSE
INFORMATION AND
WITH THE OTHER PERSONS INVOLVED.
A. proof of insurance only
B. proof of insurance and vehicle registration only
C. proof of insurance, vehicle registration, and current address
Why do you think that resisting arrest is considered a serious crime? What elements of the crime of resisting arrest led you to this decision? Do you think it should be considered a misdemeanor or a felony? Explain.
* For Criminal Justice *
Answer:
Resisting should be a misdemeanor and evading should be a felony
Explanation:
If the person is trying to get out while being cuffed, they do not pose much of a danger to the public. But evading is a much larger category. For instance you could lead the police on a high speed car chase and then crash into someone and kill them. You pose a much greater threat to the public.
Resisting arrest is considered serious crime because it doess not only challenge the power of authority but also create security issues for general citizens.
Resisting Arrest
An arrest of a person signifies the power of State and strengthens the trust on Police Force, while the resistance over the arrest is the natural action of an accused but being successful in resisting creates doubt over police force and the authority.
Therefore, resisting arrest is considered serious crime. This should be considered as felony, because the term felony is related to the crimes which are considered very serious.
Learn more about Arrest here:
https://brainly.com/question/8533149
In the case of DC vs Heller what was the constitutional issue addressed?
Answer:
i think D.C
Explanation:
Opposing sides of a bill will do which of the following, which means giving arguments for or against a bill?
OA Debate
ОВ.
Enroll
OC. Propose
OD
Amend
Answer:
a. debate
Explanation:
Should there be limits on campaign contributions people and businesses can make to political campaigns. Why or Why not?
Answer:
yes because the people should decide not the super wealthy
which of the following is not an intentional for a crime?
a. prevention
b. knowledge intent
c. negligence
d. reckless intent
Answer:
c
Explanation:
I know it
Which state has the most electors? How many states have at least 15 electors? List the states. Which states have the fewest electors?
Answer:florida, texas,ohio, new york, pennsylvainia, california, and north carolina all have the most electoral votes. the ones that have the least are montana, idaho, DC, rhode island, WY, maine and vermont.
Explanation:
What Is A Reconstructed Memory ?
Answer:
hello
Explanation:
Reconstructive memory is a theory of memory recall, in which the act of remembering is influenced by various other cognitive processes including perception, imagination, semantic memory and beliefs, amongst others.
Answer:
A memory that has been reconstructed
Explanation:
Reconstructive memory is a theory of memory recall
Can someone help me out with these? Please and thank you!
Which statement best supports zimbardos belief that people are not born good or evil
Answer:
A . “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
Explanation:
Zimbardo claims that the line between good and evil is permeable, meaning that people are not born “good” or “evil”. On the contrary, everyone can cross that line, especially under certain circumstances. For example, the soldiers´ mental state and the lack of supervision, training, or accountability led to the abuse of an Iraqi prisoner in Abu Ghraib.
Which of these statements is true of representative democracy?
A. Citizens have unlimited individual rights.
B. Citizens vote directly on all laws and government actions.
C. Government leaders rule by force.
D. The people elect government leaders.
Answer:
D Is the correct answere
A constituent is a person who is represented politically by a designated government official or
officeholder
True
O False
Problem solving should be based on which of the following techniques?
action and reaction
first identified, first solved
immediate determination
investigative process
Answer:
investigative process :)
Explanation:
i just did the assignment lol
i hope this helps ;)
Why do candidates interested in pretrial services need to have an interest in different locations?
A. Their chief work is to monitor electronic ankle bracelets.
B. These services are offered by various types of agencies in different locations.
C. They will learn to serve in one specific judge's jurisdiction.
D. They will need to learn everything about parole.
Answer:
B. These services are offered by various types of agencies in different locations.
Explanation:
Can a person be a neurotic, schizophrenic, and psychopath?
Why did my school blocked this as plagiarism
Answer:
KKKKKK
Explanation:
Which of these is an example of business ownership?
a. A freelance journalist
b. A day trader of stock
c. A hair salon franchisee
d. A wage earner at a company
the first generation of computers used vaccum tubes .Why were they replaced by the transistors
Answer: They were replaced Because the transistor was so much smaller and consumed significantly less power, a computer system built with transistors was also much smaller, faster, and more efficient than a computer system built with vacuum tubes.
What can a candidate do to attract undecided voters In a swing state?
Choose more than one answer.
A. Cut back on fundraising efforts in that state
B. Select a running mate from that state
C. Refuse to participate in debates
D. Spend millions of dollars on local ads
E. Give speeches and organize rallies across the state
F. Switch parties in the middle of the race
Answer:
E D and B ia the answeres
Scott is really angry at his friend Rob for having a higher score at playing Angry Birds on their phones. He has always been the best at that game. He sees Rob walking down the street, and he decides to hit him with his car so he can’t play Angry Birds anymore. At the last minute, he changes his mind, but he can’t stop the car in time, and it hits Rob, who ends up getting injured (based on People v. Claborn, 1964).
CAN SCOTT BE CONVICTED OF BATTERY? BATTERY IS CONTACT WITH ANOTHER IN A MANNER LIKELY TO CAUSE BODILY HARM.
Answer:
Yes, he can be convicted of battery.
Explanation:
Even if he changed his mind about killing Rob, he committed injury and needs to be put in jail for it.
P.S: That is a stupid reason to want to kill someone lol
The idea that government must treat people fairly when it takes life, liberty, or property is part of your right to A.Due Process
B.Eminent Domain
C.Warrant-less Searches
D.Grand Jury
Answer: B
Explanation:
Those who argued for prison reformation based on religious viewpoints argued that which of the following was the best way to restore the moral balance of the soul?
labor
counseling
mediation
solitude
How was DNA evidence used to prove that Dr. Sam Sheppard did not murder his wife?
who makes the us energy policy
Answer:
The energy policy of the United States is determined by federal, state, and local entities in the ... Prius may cost much less than the current model. Larger advanced-technology batteries have been suggested to make it plug-in rechargeable
Another name for legal penalties is
A. crime
B. sanctions
C. jail term
D. probation
Answer:
B - Sanctions
Explanation:
The definition of sanctions is : ¨ a threatened penalty for disobeying a law or rule. ¨ I hope this helps!
Example of Lax Conscience?
"Lax conscience" describes an in consistent assortment of moral values.
An example is feigning vertue for viciously self- serving reasons, such as helping little old ladies cross busy street, and stealing their purses in the process.
Which act did the US Government pass in 1983 to protect labor forces from harassment at the hands of security personnel?
Answer:
yea its fair labor standards act
The US Government pass in 1983 to protect labor forces from harassment at the hands of security personnel is the State Labor Legislation Act.
What is Labor?
The term “Labor” refers to the amount of physical, mental, and social effort used to produce goods and services in an economy.
The 1983 state labor laws featured a number of important new laws and addressed a wide range of topics. Equal compensation for labor of equivalent value, and requirements that workers be informed of and get training on harmful substances discovered at work.
Hence, the significance of to protect labor forces is aforementioned.
Learn more about on protect labor forces, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17448063
#SPJ2
5. Sheila and Jan have T-shirts made that reflect their body about breast cancer.Which 1st amendment right are they exercising ?
a. Religion
b. Press
c. Speech
d. Petition
Answer:
I'm not sure but c probably
Answer: C- Speech
Explanation:
They are exercising the Freedom of Speech. Think about it, they are expressing their feelings about how they feel about breast cancer.
Marty stabs Chris’s hand while playing poker because he is mad he is losing. Ordinarily, a person could just wrap a wound like this and be fine. However, Chris has hemophilia, but he hasn’t told anyone even though he’s had it for years, which means he bleeds more than most people and can die from even minor injuries. He bleeds to death.
CAN MARTY BE CHARGED FOR THE DEATH OF CHRIS?
Answer:
It is mostly the responsibility of Marty. Marty should’ve been more careful when playing poker with Chris. Either way there is concequences for everything bad you do so yes Marty is going to be charged for the death of Chris.
Explanation:
How does the presidential power of commissioning all the officers of the United States link to Marbury v. Madison (1803)?
Answer:
Explanation:
the power to commission officers, as applied in practice, does not mean that the President is under constitutional obligation to commission those whose appointments have reached that stage, but merely that it is he and no one else who has the power to commission them, and that he may do so at his discretion. Under the doctrine of Marbury v. Madison, the sealing and delivery of the commission is a purely ministerial act which has been lodged by statute with the Secretary of State, and which may be compelled by mandamus unless the appointee has been in the meantime validly removed. By an opinion of the Attorney General many years later, however, the President, even after he has signed a commission, still has a locus poenitentiae and may withhold it; nor is the appointee in office till he has this commission. This is probably the correct doctrine.